ULS-PBFT: An ultra-low storage overhead PBFT consensus for blockchain

IF 6.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Blockchain-Research and Applications Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100155
Haoxiang Luo
{"title":"ULS-PBFT: An ultra-low storage overhead PBFT consensus for blockchain","authors":"Haoxiang Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) consensus mechanism can avoid the performance bottleneck of blockchain systems caused by Proof of Work (PoW), it has been widely used in many scenarios. However, in the blockchain system, each node is required to back up all transactions and block data of the system, which will waste a lot of storage resources. It is difficult to apply to scenarios with limited storage resources such as unmanned aerial vehicle networks and smart security protection; thus, it is often used in small-scale networks. In order to deploy PBFT-based blockchain systems in large-scale network scenarios, we propose an ultra-low storage overhead PBFT consensus (ULS-PBFT), which groups nodes hierarchically to limit the storage overhead within the group. In this paper, we first propose an optimal double-layer PBFT consensus from the perspective of minimizing the storage overhead, and prove that this consensus can significantly reduce the storage overhead. In addition, we also investigate the superiority of ULS-PBFT in terms of communication overhead while setting the security threshold in the presence of the possibility of Byzantine nodes. The simulation results demonstrate the advantages of ULS-PBFT. Then, we extend such grouping idea to the blockchain system with <em>X</em>-layer PBFT and analyze its storage and communication overhead. Finally, the node grouping strategy of double-layer PBFT is studied for four application scenarios when the performance of storage overhead, communication overhead, and security are considered comprehensively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53141,"journal":{"name":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100155"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000301/pdfft?md5=156a29459a07f06b4350a52f6b079a43&pid=1-s2.0-S2096720923000301-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since the Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) consensus mechanism can avoid the performance bottleneck of blockchain systems caused by Proof of Work (PoW), it has been widely used in many scenarios. However, in the blockchain system, each node is required to back up all transactions and block data of the system, which will waste a lot of storage resources. It is difficult to apply to scenarios with limited storage resources such as unmanned aerial vehicle networks and smart security protection; thus, it is often used in small-scale networks. In order to deploy PBFT-based blockchain systems in large-scale network scenarios, we propose an ultra-low storage overhead PBFT consensus (ULS-PBFT), which groups nodes hierarchically to limit the storage overhead within the group. In this paper, we first propose an optimal double-layer PBFT consensus from the perspective of minimizing the storage overhead, and prove that this consensus can significantly reduce the storage overhead. In addition, we also investigate the superiority of ULS-PBFT in terms of communication overhead while setting the security threshold in the presence of the possibility of Byzantine nodes. The simulation results demonstrate the advantages of ULS-PBFT. Then, we extend such grouping idea to the blockchain system with X-layer PBFT and analyze its storage and communication overhead. Finally, the node grouping strategy of double-layer PBFT is studied for four application scenarios when the performance of storage overhead, communication overhead, and security are considered comprehensively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ULS-PBFT:区块链的超低存储开销PBFT共识
由于实用拜占庭容错(PBFT)共识机制可以避免工作量证明(PoW)带来的区块链系统性能瓶颈,因此在许多场景中得到了广泛应用。然而,在区块链系统中,每个节点都需要备份系统的所有事务和块数据,这将浪费大量的存储资源。难以应用于无人机网络、智能安防等存储资源有限的场景;因此,它通常用于小规模网络。为了在大规模网络场景中部署基于PBFT的区块链系统,我们提出了一种超低存储开销的PBFT共识(ULS-PBFT),它将节点分层分组以限制组内的存储开销。本文首先从最小化存储开销的角度提出了一种最优的双层PBFT共识,并证明了该共识可以显著降低存储开销。此外,我们还研究了ULS-PBFT在存在拜占庭节点可能性的情况下设置安全阈值时在通信开销方面的优势。仿真结果验证了ULS-PBFT的优越性。然后,我们将这种分组思想扩展到x层PBFT的区块链系统中,并分析了其存储和通信开销。最后,在综合考虑存储开销、通信开销和安全性能的四种应用场景下,研究了双层PBFT的节点分组策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Blockchain: Research and Applications is an international, peer reviewed journal for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to present the latest advances and innovations in blockchain research. The journal publishes theoretical and applied papers in established and emerging areas of blockchain research to shape the future of blockchain technology.
期刊最新文献
Partial pre-image attack on Proof-of-Work based blockchains Dual-blockchain based multi-layer grouping federated learning scheme for heterogeneous data in industrial IoT How can the holder trust the verifier? A CP-ABPRE-based solution to control the access to claims in a Self-Sovereign-Identity scenario Privacy-preserving pathological data sharing among multiple remote parties Prism blockchain enabled Internet of Things with deep reinforcement learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1