Background Analysis of Community Acquired Pneumonia: Environmental Bio contamination in Residential Spaces

K. Nakamoto, Sadahiro Kawamoto, Y. Kawamura, N. Tahara, T. Fujii, H. Hashiyada
{"title":"Background Analysis of Community Acquired Pneumonia: Environmental Bio contamination in Residential Spaces","authors":"K. Nakamoto, Sadahiro Kawamoto, Y. Kawamura, N. Tahara, T. Fujii, H. Hashiyada","doi":"10.33425/2639-9458.1114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The cause of the prevalence increase in community-acquired pneumonia is unclear. The environmental bio contamination of residential spaces was investigated. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 146 pneumonia patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2019 was performed. Age, living status, smoking status, and nursing care status were assessed. Bio contamination in residential spaces and the bactericidal effects of tobacco, incense-stick smoke and electrolyzed saline (ES) were examined using Koch’s method. Results: The patients were quite old (mean age: 80.9 ± 12.6 y.o.). Living in a private residence, where smoking tobacco, pesticide and incense-stick use might be allowed, carried a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.026, 95% CI: 0.003–0.190). Current smokers had a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.348, 95%CI: 0.143–0.844). Patients that did not require nursing care had a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.004, 95%CI: 0.001–0.026). Significantly more colony-forming units (CFU) were detected in communal spaces than in private spaces (5.85 ± 1.41 vs 0.30 ± 0.24 CFU/5 min). Significantly more CFU were detected in places where smoking was restricted than in spaces where smoking was allowed (5.90 ± 1.49 vs 1.24 ± 0.79 CFU/5 min). However, the examined residential spaces were generally clean. The number of CFU in vocalized droplets was very high (thousands). Both tobacco and incensestick smoke had bactericidal effects on droplet-borne bio contamination; i.e., they reduced the number of CFU by >90%, as did ES solution, which also suppressed oropharyngeal bio contamination. Conclusions: Smokeless residential environment might be responsible to the prevalence increase of communityacquired pneumonia. ES might contribute to preventing pneumonia epidemics.","PeriodicalId":93597,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9458.1114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The cause of the prevalence increase in community-acquired pneumonia is unclear. The environmental bio contamination of residential spaces was investigated. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 146 pneumonia patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2019 was performed. Age, living status, smoking status, and nursing care status were assessed. Bio contamination in residential spaces and the bactericidal effects of tobacco, incense-stick smoke and electrolyzed saline (ES) were examined using Koch’s method. Results: The patients were quite old (mean age: 80.9 ± 12.6 y.o.). Living in a private residence, where smoking tobacco, pesticide and incense-stick use might be allowed, carried a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.026, 95% CI: 0.003–0.190). Current smokers had a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.348, 95%CI: 0.143–0.844). Patients that did not require nursing care had a low risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.004, 95%CI: 0.001–0.026). Significantly more colony-forming units (CFU) were detected in communal spaces than in private spaces (5.85 ± 1.41 vs 0.30 ± 0.24 CFU/5 min). Significantly more CFU were detected in places where smoking was restricted than in spaces where smoking was allowed (5.90 ± 1.49 vs 1.24 ± 0.79 CFU/5 min). However, the examined residential spaces were generally clean. The number of CFU in vocalized droplets was very high (thousands). Both tobacco and incensestick smoke had bactericidal effects on droplet-borne bio contamination; i.e., they reduced the number of CFU by >90%, as did ES solution, which also suppressed oropharyngeal bio contamination. Conclusions: Smokeless residential environment might be responsible to the prevalence increase of communityacquired pneumonia. ES might contribute to preventing pneumonia epidemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区获得性肺炎背景分析:居住空间环境生物污染
目的:社区获得性肺炎患病率上升的原因尚不清楚。对居住空间的环境生物污染进行了调查。患者和方法:对2019年1月至2019年12月收治的146例肺炎患者进行回顾性分析。评估年龄、生活状况、吸烟状况及护理状况。采用科赫法对居住空间的生物污染以及烟草、香薰烟和电解盐水的杀菌效果进行了研究。结果:患者年龄较大,平均年龄80.9±12.6岁。居住在允许吸烟、使用杀虫剂和香烛的私人住宅中,肺炎的风险较低(OR: 0.026, 95% CI: 0.003-0.190)。目前吸烟者患肺炎的风险较低(OR: 0.348, 95%CI: 0.143-0.844)。不需要护理的患者发生肺炎的风险较低(OR: 0.004, 95%CI: 0.001-0.026)。在公共空间检测到的菌落形成单位(CFU)明显高于私人空间(5.85±1.41 vs 0.30±0.24 CFU/5 min)。限制吸烟场所的CFU检出率明显高于允许吸烟场所(5.90±1.49 vs 1.24±0.79 CFU/5 min)。然而,被检查的住宅空间总体上是干净的。发声液滴中CFU的数量非常高(数千个)。烟叶和烟香对雾滴传播的生物污染均有杀菌作用;也就是说,它们将CFU的数量减少了90%,ES溶液也是如此,它也抑制了口咽生物污染。结论:无烟居住环境可能是导致社区获得性肺炎患病率上升的主要原因。ES可能有助于预防肺炎流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why So Many Negative Coproculture? About 2329 Corocultures Carried Out at the Charles De Gaulle Pediatric Hospital Center in Hospitalized Children Aged 0 To 5 Years Old Impact of Vaccination on COVID-19 case fatality in the United Kingdom Congenital Trypanosomiasis in an 11-Year-Old Girl at the Brazzaville University Hospital Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Palmitate (EC16) on In Vitro Norovirus Infection. Novel COVID Model to Help Early Diagnosis of COVID-19 and Prediction of Disease Severity: A Multicenter Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1