Book review: Zwischen Globalismus und Demokratie. Politische Ökonomie im ausgehenden Neoliberalismus

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Journal of Classical Sociology Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1177/1468795X221127246
C. Crouch
{"title":"Book review: Zwischen Globalismus und Demokratie. Politische Ökonomie im ausgehenden Neoliberalismus","authors":"C. Crouch","doi":"10.1177/1468795X221127246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a number of recent contributions Wolfgang Streeck has provided some of the most penetrating analyses of contemporary capitalism. Particularly noticeable has been his distinction (2013) between Staatsvolk (the people constituting the democratically entitled citizenry of a nation) and Marktvolk (the global holders of finance capital, whose power is exercised over governments through means that bypass and over-run national democracy). In this new work he goes beyond these earlier analyses to provide an account of what he sees as the mutual incompatibility of democracy and a globalized economy. In doing so he reintroduces and updates the contributions to understanding capitalism of those two giants of mid-20th century analysis, John Maynard Keynes and Karl Polanyi. There is also considerable use of data and various research findings, but also of such surprising authors as Edward Gibbon. A core argument of the book is that globalization has shifted power away from the nation state, which has been the primary level at which democracy has flourished, passing it to networks of global corporations. Whereas many of the advocates of globalization depict it as replacing hierarchical state action by free markets in which consumers are dominant, Streeck points out that the architecture of the new global governance is itself highly vertical. Power is drawn out of the various levels of democratic action and lodged in a few international banks and other giant firms. The doctrine of shareholder value maximization has displaced any other responsibilities (to workers, customers, the environment) that firms possessed when they could be regulated at national levels. By erecting global supply chains, corporations have been able to source parts of their products from wherever labor is cheapest and possesses fewest rights, where environmental and other protective regulation is very weak, where taxation is lowest. As a result, much global trading that looks as though it operates through markets really takes place within the structures of individual giant firms, enabling them for example, to use book-keeping techniques to allocate their costs to wherever they choose, irrespective of what is really happening. One might add, though Streeck himself does not make this point, that the accountancy and audit process of contemporary capitalism are as fictive as the “posttruth” of much current political and governmental discourse. The global economy is not really a market economy, but one dominated by giant corporations—and, one might add, their political allies. 1127246 JCS0010.1177/1468795X221127246Journal of Classical SociologyBook Review book-review2022","PeriodicalId":44864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classical Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X221127246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a number of recent contributions Wolfgang Streeck has provided some of the most penetrating analyses of contemporary capitalism. Particularly noticeable has been his distinction (2013) between Staatsvolk (the people constituting the democratically entitled citizenry of a nation) and Marktvolk (the global holders of finance capital, whose power is exercised over governments through means that bypass and over-run national democracy). In this new work he goes beyond these earlier analyses to provide an account of what he sees as the mutual incompatibility of democracy and a globalized economy. In doing so he reintroduces and updates the contributions to understanding capitalism of those two giants of mid-20th century analysis, John Maynard Keynes and Karl Polanyi. There is also considerable use of data and various research findings, but also of such surprising authors as Edward Gibbon. A core argument of the book is that globalization has shifted power away from the nation state, which has been the primary level at which democracy has flourished, passing it to networks of global corporations. Whereas many of the advocates of globalization depict it as replacing hierarchical state action by free markets in which consumers are dominant, Streeck points out that the architecture of the new global governance is itself highly vertical. Power is drawn out of the various levels of democratic action and lodged in a few international banks and other giant firms. The doctrine of shareholder value maximization has displaced any other responsibilities (to workers, customers, the environment) that firms possessed when they could be regulated at national levels. By erecting global supply chains, corporations have been able to source parts of their products from wherever labor is cheapest and possesses fewest rights, where environmental and other protective regulation is very weak, where taxation is lowest. As a result, much global trading that looks as though it operates through markets really takes place within the structures of individual giant firms, enabling them for example, to use book-keeping techniques to allocate their costs to wherever they choose, irrespective of what is really happening. One might add, though Streeck himself does not make this point, that the accountancy and audit process of contemporary capitalism are as fictive as the “posttruth” of much current political and governmental discourse. The global economy is not really a market economy, but one dominated by giant corporations—and, one might add, their political allies. 1127246 JCS0010.1177/1468795X221127246Journal of Classical SociologyBook Review book-review2022
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书本审查:全球化与民主之间的全球化政治自由主义的新兴自由主义
在最近的几篇文章中,沃尔夫冈·施特雷克对当代资本主义进行了一些最深入的分析。尤其值得注意的是,他(2013年)对Staatsvolk(构成一个国家民主权利公民的人)和Marktvolk(金融资本的全球持有者,他们通过绕过和超越国家民主的方式对政府行使权力)进行了区分。在这部新作中,他超越了这些早期的分析,提供了他所认为的民主与全球化经济相互矛盾的解释。在此过程中,他重新介绍并更新了两位20世纪中期分析的巨人——约翰•梅纳德•凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes)和卡尔•波兰尼(Karl Polanyi)对理解资本主义的贡献。书中还大量使用了数据和各种研究结果,但也引用了爱德华·吉本(Edward Gibbon)等令人惊讶的作者。这本书的一个核心论点是,全球化已经将权力从民族国家转移到全球公司网络,而民族国家一直是民主繁荣的主要层面。尽管许多全球化的倡导者将其描述为用消费者占主导地位的自由市场取代等级制国家行为,但施特雷克指出,新的全球治理架构本身是高度垂直的。权力从各个层面的民主行动中抽离出来,掌握在少数几家国际银行和其他大公司手中。股东价值最大化的原则已经取代了公司在国家层面上可以监管的任何其他责任(对工人、客户和环境)。通过建立全球供应链,企业能够从劳动力最便宜、权利最少、环境和其他保护法规非常薄弱、税收最低的地方采购部分产品。因此,许多看似通过市场运作的全球交易实际上是在单个大公司的结构内进行的,例如,使它们能够使用簿记技术将成本分配到他们选择的任何地方,而不管实际发生了什么。有人可能会补充说,当代资本主义的会计和审计过程与许多当前政治和政府话语的“后真相”一样虚幻,尽管斯特雷克本人并没有提出这一点。全球经济并不是真正的市场经济,而是由大公司主导的经济,还有他们的政治盟友。1127246 JCS0010.1177/1468795X221127246Journal of Classical SociologyBook Review book-review2022
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Classical Sociology publishes cutting-edge articles that will command general respect within the academic community. The aim of the Journal of Classical Sociology is to demonstrate scholarly excellence in the study of the sociological tradition. The journal elucidates the origins of sociology and also demonstrates how the classical tradition renews the sociological imagination in the present day. The journal is a critical but constructive reflection on the roots and formation of sociology from the Enlightenment to the 21st century. Journal of Classical Sociology promotes discussions of early social theory, such as Hobbesian contract theory, through the 19th- and early 20th- century classics associated with the thought of Comte, Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Simmel, Veblen.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Concealed Silences and Inaudible Voices in Political Thinking Dewey’s Peircean aesthetics: An exegesis and its upshot for sociology Simmel on the war for national spirit and cosmopolitan culture Mead on international mindedness and the war to end war Book Review: Challenging Modernity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1