Philip Pettit’s Republicanism and Labour Law: A Defence

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.54648/ijcl2021019
Dáire Mccormack-George
{"title":"Philip Pettit’s Republicanism and Labour Law: A Defence","authors":"Dáire Mccormack-George","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2021019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Republican political theory has attracted the attention of a number of prominent academic labour lawyers in recent years with a view to providing a general theoretical or philosophical foundation for labour law. Engaging with and contributing to this emerging area of scholarly interest, this article endeavours to defend the possibility of a general republican theory of labour law by relying on the writings of Philip Pettit. Contrary to the arguments of these scholars, the paper suggests that at least some important parts of labour law could be explained and justified in the light of this particular version of republicanism and it is possible that many other if not all areas could be justified in the future. As Pettit’s republicanism is a work in progress, so too is the explanation and justification of labour law in the light thereof.\nPhilosophy of Labour Law, Perfectionism, Consequentialism, Republicanism, Freedom as Non-Domination, Philip Pettit, Social Justice, Political Legitimacy, Sovereignty","PeriodicalId":44213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2021019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Republican political theory has attracted the attention of a number of prominent academic labour lawyers in recent years with a view to providing a general theoretical or philosophical foundation for labour law. Engaging with and contributing to this emerging area of scholarly interest, this article endeavours to defend the possibility of a general republican theory of labour law by relying on the writings of Philip Pettit. Contrary to the arguments of these scholars, the paper suggests that at least some important parts of labour law could be explained and justified in the light of this particular version of republicanism and it is possible that many other if not all areas could be justified in the future. As Pettit’s republicanism is a work in progress, so too is the explanation and justification of labour law in the light thereof. Philosophy of Labour Law, Perfectionism, Consequentialism, Republicanism, Freedom as Non-Domination, Philip Pettit, Social Justice, Political Legitimacy, Sovereignty
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲利普·佩蒂特的《共和主义与劳动法:辩护》
近年来,共和党政治理论吸引了许多著名的劳动律师学者的注意,以期为劳动法提供一般的理论或哲学基础。本文致力于并致力于这一新兴的学术领域,试图通过引用菲利普·佩蒂特的著作来捍卫劳动法的一般共和理论的可能性。与这些学者的论点相反,本文认为,至少劳动法的一些重要部分可以根据这种特定版本的共和主义来解释和证明,而且在未来,许多其他领域(如果不是所有领域)也可能是合理的。佩蒂特的共和主义是一项正在进行的工作,因此对劳动法的解释和辩护也是如此。劳动法哲学、完美主义、后果主义、共和主义、作为非支配的自由、菲利普·佩蒂特、社会正义、政治合法性、主权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.
期刊最新文献
Litigating the Algorithmic Boss in the EU: A (Legally) Feasible and (Strategically) Attractive Option for Trade Unions? Modern Slavery in Liner Shipping: An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Statements The Requirement of Fair Negotiation (Gebot des fairen Verhandelns) and the Principle of Undue Influence in German and US Employment Law Regulating Platform Work in the UK and Italy: Politics, Law and Political Economy Regulating Algorithmic Management at Work in the European Union: Data Protection, Non-discrimination and Collective Rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1