Association between body mass index, body image and self-esteem with sexual function: A survey of young women in Singapore.

IF 5.2 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022358
Farah Safdar Husain, Dypti Lulla, Timothy Kai Cheng Tay, Jean-Jasmin Ml Lee, Satvinder Singh Dhaliwal, Seng Bin Ang
{"title":"Association between body mass index, body image and self-esteem with sexual function: A survey of young women in Singapore.","authors":"Farah Safdar Husain, Dypti Lulla, Timothy Kai Cheng Tay, Jean-Jasmin Ml Lee, Satvinder Singh Dhaliwal, Seng Bin Ang","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obesity is thought to be a negative predictor of sexual function, but the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and sexual function has been inconsistent. Other factors such as body image and self-esteem may mediate this relationship. This study examined the association of BMI, body image and self-esteem with sexual function in young women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 514 sexually active women aged 21 to 35 years completed an anonymised online questionnaire that used 3 scales to assess body image, self-esteem and female sexual function: Body Image States Scale (BISS), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Higher scores for BISS, RSES and FSFI indicate more positive body image, higher self-esteem and better sexual function, respectively. Spearman correlation assessed the association among BMI, BISS and RSES scores, and with FSFI scores. Linear and multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors associated with sexual dysfunction (FSFI <26.55).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BISS and RSES scores significantly correlated with FSFI scores (r=0.27 and r=0.32, respectively; both P<0.001), indicating that better body image and self-esteem were associated with better sexual function. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction were lower BISS and RSES scores, being married (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.15), having 1 child (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.26-4.77) and having a perceived mental condition (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.44-6.33). Factors in lack of sexual dysfunction include being of Malay ethnicity (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.71) and being overweight (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women with poorer body image and lower self-esteem were more likely to have sexual dysfunction. These perceptions and states did not correlate with being overweight, and were better predictors over BMI to identify the population at-risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50774,"journal":{"name":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is thought to be a negative predictor of sexual function, but the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and sexual function has been inconsistent. Other factors such as body image and self-esteem may mediate this relationship. This study examined the association of BMI, body image and self-esteem with sexual function in young women.

Method: A total of 514 sexually active women aged 21 to 35 years completed an anonymised online questionnaire that used 3 scales to assess body image, self-esteem and female sexual function: Body Image States Scale (BISS), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Higher scores for BISS, RSES and FSFI indicate more positive body image, higher self-esteem and better sexual function, respectively. Spearman correlation assessed the association among BMI, BISS and RSES scores, and with FSFI scores. Linear and multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors associated with sexual dysfunction (FSFI <26.55).

Results: BISS and RSES scores significantly correlated with FSFI scores (r=0.27 and r=0.32, respectively; both P<0.001), indicating that better body image and self-esteem were associated with better sexual function. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction were lower BISS and RSES scores, being married (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-2.15), having 1 child (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.26-4.77) and having a perceived mental condition (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.44-6.33). Factors in lack of sexual dysfunction include being of Malay ethnicity (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.71) and being overweight (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.78).

Conclusion: Women with poorer body image and lower self-esteem were more likely to have sexual dysfunction. These perceptions and states did not correlate with being overweight, and were better predictors over BMI to identify the population at-risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重指数、身体形象和自尊与性功能的关系:新加坡年轻女性的调查
导语:肥胖被认为是性功能的负向预测因子,但身体质量指数(BMI)与性功能之间的关系一直不一致。其他因素,如身体形象和自尊可能调解这种关系。这项研究调查了年轻女性的身体质量指数、身体形象和自尊与性功能的关系。方法:对514名年龄在21 ~ 35岁的性活跃女性进行匿名在线问卷调查,采用身体形象状态量表(BISS)、罗森博格自尊量表(RSES)和女性性功能指数(FSFI) 3种量表评估身体形象、自尊和女性性功能。BISS、RSES和FSFI得分越高,分别表明身体形象越积极、自尊越高、性功能越好。Spearman相关性评估BMI、BISS和RSES评分以及FSFI评分之间的相关性。线性和多变量logistic回归确定了与性功能障碍相关的危险因素(FSFI <26.55)。结果:BISS、RSES评分与FSFI评分显著相关(r=0.27、r=0.32);P均<0.001),表明良好的身体形象和自尊与良好的性功能有关。性功能障碍的危险因素为较低的bis和RSES评分、已婚(优势比[OR] 1.52;95%可信区间[CI] 1.07-2.15),生育1个孩子(OR 2.45;95% CI 1.26-4.77)和有感知到的精神状况(OR 3.02;95% ci 1.44-6.33)。缺乏性功能障碍的因素包括马来族(OR 0.38;95% CI 0.21-0.71)和超重(OR 0.46;95% ci 0.27-0.78)。结论:身体形象差、自尊心低的女性更容易出现性功能障碍。这些感知和状态与超重无关,是比BMI更好的预测高危人群的指标。关键词:女性性功能、妇产科、性健康
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore
Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals is the official journal of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore. Established in 1972, Annals is the leading medical journal in Singapore which aims to publish novel findings from clinical research as well as medical practices that can benefit the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Singapore’s Experience in Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Key Lessons from the Ground COVID-19: The virus, vaccine and paediatric heart Cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 in children Long COVID prevalence, risk factors and impact of vaccination in the paediatric population: a survey study in Singapore Association of quality-of-care indicators with asthma outcomes: An observational study for asthma care in Singapore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1