Hierarchical Factor Classification of Dendrochronological Time-Series

S. Camiz, F. Spada, J. Denimal, S. Piraino
{"title":"Hierarchical Factor Classification of Dendrochronological Time-Series","authors":"S. Camiz, F. Spada, J. Denimal, S. Piraino","doi":"10.12899/ASR-1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, Hierarchical Factor Classification (HFC), an exploratory method of classification of characters is introduced, in comparison with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in order to show its advantages, in particular when dealing with time series. Exploratory data analysis may play a very relevant role in the understanding of the structure of a data set prior the use of statistical methods – as hypothesis testing and inference, and models. The study of tree-rings time series through exploratory methods may also take advantages, by allowing some interpretation to be further checked via a small number of statistical tests. In particular, while providing overall results close to those of PCA, HFC complements it, by providing a classification of the time-series and estimating a representative chronology for each group, common to the clustered ones. As case study, a data set is taken from literature, composed by five synchronous 79 years-long chronologies of Pinus pinea L., from five different populations scattered along the Tyrrhenian coast in peninsular Italy. HFC suggests how conveniently aggregate the chronologies, by showing similarities and differences between them, otherwise unnoticed, suggesting to limit the aggregation to three chronologies only.","PeriodicalId":37733,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"62-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12899/ASR-1968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, Hierarchical Factor Classification (HFC), an exploratory method of classification of characters is introduced, in comparison with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in order to show its advantages, in particular when dealing with time series. Exploratory data analysis may play a very relevant role in the understanding of the structure of a data set prior the use of statistical methods – as hypothesis testing and inference, and models. The study of tree-rings time series through exploratory methods may also take advantages, by allowing some interpretation to be further checked via a small number of statistical tests. In particular, while providing overall results close to those of PCA, HFC complements it, by providing a classification of the time-series and estimating a representative chronology for each group, common to the clustered ones. As case study, a data set is taken from literature, composed by five synchronous 79 years-long chronologies of Pinus pinea L., from five different populations scattered along the Tyrrhenian coast in peninsular Italy. HFC suggests how conveniently aggregate the chronologies, by showing similarities and differences between them, otherwise unnoticed, suggesting to limit the aggregation to three chronologies only.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树年代学时间序列的层次因子分类
本文介绍了一种探索性的字符分类方法——层次因子分类(HFC),并与主成分分析(PCA)进行了比较,以显示其在处理时间序列时的优势。在使用统计方法之前,探索性数据分析可能在理解数据集的结构方面发挥非常相关的作用-作为假设检验和推理,以及模型。通过探索性方法研究树木年轮时间序列也有其优势,因为它允许通过少量统计检验进一步检验某些解释。特别是,虽然提供了接近PCA的总体结果,但HFC通过提供时间序列的分类和估计每个组的代表性年表(与聚类组相同)对其进行了补充。作为案例研究,数据集来自文献,由分散在意大利半岛第勒尼安海岸的五个不同种群的五个同步79年的松果年表组成。HFC建议通过显示它们之间的相似性和差异性来方便地聚合这些年表,否则就不会被注意到,建议将聚合限制为仅三个年表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Silvicultural Research
Annals of Silvicultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of TLS against traditional surveying method for stem taper modelling. A case study in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests of mount Amiata Lessons learned from the past: forestry initiatives for effective carbon stocking in Southern Italy Towards a comprehensive development of eco-innovation indicators in forestry sector: an application in the Italian Alps Gaps and perspectives for the improvement of the sweet chestnut forest-wood chain in Italy The diversity of termite species on natural forest and agroforestry land in Sulawesi tropical forests in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1