Saugat Das, A. Singh, Nehar Sinam, L. Singh, N. Singh
{"title":"A clinical study of single intraneural platelet-rich plasma injection in peripheral nerve repair","authors":"Saugat Das, A. Singh, Nehar Sinam, L. Singh, N. Singh","doi":"10.4103/jms.jms_26_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Peripheral nerve injuries cause great morbidity leaving many with long-term disabilities with high societal costs. Direct tension-free microsurgical repair and/or the transplantation of a nerve autograft to bridge the gap are the gold standard treatments. However, such treatments may not recreate the suitable cellular and molecular microenvironment and in some cases, the functional recovery of nerve injuries is incomplete. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study is to investigate if, and to what extent, PRP can improve the clinical condition after nerve repair. To study the effects and therapeutic potential of platelet rich plasma in traumatic nerve injury. Materials and Methods: A hospital based Non-Randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital setup in Manipur, India, for a period of 2 years. This study was done on 12 patients who underwent peripheral nerve repair. Materials and method The selected sample will be divided into two groups. Control group was treated with direct tension-free epineural microsurgical repair and the treatment group was treated with direct tension-free epineural microsurgical repair along with intraoperative infiltrating the nerve stumps perineurally and intraneurally with a single dose of autologous PRP injection. Comparison was done on the basis of subjective and objective outcomes between the groups over a period of 1 year. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was done by using IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows. Descriptive statistics such as mean, proportion, percentage were used to present the result. Chi square test was used to see the association of proportions. Student's t- test and repeated ANOVA were used for the continuous variables. P-value <0.05 was taken as significant. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the study, who were divided into 2 groups i.e., Case group and Control group, with 6 patients in each. The two groups were comparable with regards to patient characteristics, nerve injured and time interval to surgery. The patients in the case group, had significant improved outcome, when compare to control group, in terms of subjective (quickDASH) and objective tests (2-point discrimination, sensory recovery, motor strength and nerve conduction studies). Conclusion: In this study we found that intraoperative PRP injection can improve the clinical outcome after nerve repair in traumatic nerve injury.","PeriodicalId":39636,"journal":{"name":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"167 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_26_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Peripheral nerve injuries cause great morbidity leaving many with long-term disabilities with high societal costs. Direct tension-free microsurgical repair and/or the transplantation of a nerve autograft to bridge the gap are the gold standard treatments. However, such treatments may not recreate the suitable cellular and molecular microenvironment and in some cases, the functional recovery of nerve injuries is incomplete. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study is to investigate if, and to what extent, PRP can improve the clinical condition after nerve repair. To study the effects and therapeutic potential of platelet rich plasma in traumatic nerve injury. Materials and Methods: A hospital based Non-Randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital setup in Manipur, India, for a period of 2 years. This study was done on 12 patients who underwent peripheral nerve repair. Materials and method The selected sample will be divided into two groups. Control group was treated with direct tension-free epineural microsurgical repair and the treatment group was treated with direct tension-free epineural microsurgical repair along with intraoperative infiltrating the nerve stumps perineurally and intraneurally with a single dose of autologous PRP injection. Comparison was done on the basis of subjective and objective outcomes between the groups over a period of 1 year. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was done by using IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows. Descriptive statistics such as mean, proportion, percentage were used to present the result. Chi square test was used to see the association of proportions. Student's t- test and repeated ANOVA were used for the continuous variables. P-value <0.05 was taken as significant. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the study, who were divided into 2 groups i.e., Case group and Control group, with 6 patients in each. The two groups were comparable with regards to patient characteristics, nerve injured and time interval to surgery. The patients in the case group, had significant improved outcome, when compare to control group, in terms of subjective (quickDASH) and objective tests (2-point discrimination, sensory recovery, motor strength and nerve conduction studies). Conclusion: In this study we found that intraoperative PRP injection can improve the clinical outcome after nerve repair in traumatic nerve injury.
背景:周围神经损伤的发病率很高,许多人长期残疾,社会成本很高。直接无张力显微外科修复和/或自体神经移植来弥合间隙是金标准治疗方法。然而,这种治疗可能无法重建合适的细胞和分子微环境,在某些情况下,神经损伤的功能恢复是不完整的。目的和目的:本研究的目的是探讨PRP是否以及在多大程度上改善神经修复后的临床状况。目的:探讨富血小板血浆在外伤性神经损伤中的作用及治疗潜力。材料和方法:在印度曼尼普尔的一家三级医院进行了为期2年的医院非随机对照试验。本研究对12例接受周围神经修复的患者进行了研究。材料和方法选择的样本将被分为两组。对照组采用直接无张力神经外膜显微外科修复术,治疗组采用直接无张力神经外膜显微外科修复术并术中单剂量自体PRP注射神经残端神经周和神经内浸润。在1年的时间里,根据两组之间的主观和客观结果进行比较。统计分析采用IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows进行统计分析。使用描述性统计,如平均值、比例、百分比来表示结果。使用卡方检验来查看比例的关联。连续变量采用学生t检验和重复方差分析。p值<0.05为显著性。结果:共纳入12例患者,分为2组,即病例组和对照组,每组6例。两组在患者特征、神经损伤和手术时间间隔方面具有可比性。与对照组相比,病例组患者在主观(quickDASH)和客观测试(两点识别、感觉恢复、运动强度和神经传导研究)方面的结果均有显著改善。结论:术中注射PRP可改善外伤性神经损伤修复后的临床疗效。