Effect of lime source, fineness and granulation on neutralisation of soil pH

D. Du Toit, P. Swanepoel, A. Hardie
{"title":"Effect of lime source, fineness and granulation on neutralisation of soil pH","authors":"D. Du Toit, P. Swanepoel, A. Hardie","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2022.2043470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little information is available regarding the liming efficiency of various local lime sources and products currently available in South Africa. Recently, granulated micro-fine limes are being widely marketed as being superior to class A limes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various local, commercially available hydrated, calcitic and dolomitic lime sources (i.e., from different quarries) and forms (class A, micro-fine and granulated micro-fine) at increasing soil pH over time (365 days) under controlled conditions in two contrasting acid soils (sand and loam). Liming materials were applied adjusted for calcium carbonate equivalence (CCE) to achieve a target pHKCl of 5.5 and incubated at 85% field capacity. Micro-fine calcitic limes and hydrated limes increased pH the fastest (first 30–60 days), but the difference between these materials and class A limes attenuated over time. The difference in performance between class A limes was relatively minor (0.5 pH units), if applied based on CCE. Chemical purity (Ca%, CCE) was the main factor controlling liming effectiveness and particle fineness only related to the short-term reaction (4–7 days). Granulated limes showed the poorest performance in terms of pH correction attributed to poor solubility and spatial zonation of liming effects.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2022.2043470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Little information is available regarding the liming efficiency of various local lime sources and products currently available in South Africa. Recently, granulated micro-fine limes are being widely marketed as being superior to class A limes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various local, commercially available hydrated, calcitic and dolomitic lime sources (i.e., from different quarries) and forms (class A, micro-fine and granulated micro-fine) at increasing soil pH over time (365 days) under controlled conditions in two contrasting acid soils (sand and loam). Liming materials were applied adjusted for calcium carbonate equivalence (CCE) to achieve a target pHKCl of 5.5 and incubated at 85% field capacity. Micro-fine calcitic limes and hydrated limes increased pH the fastest (first 30–60 days), but the difference between these materials and class A limes attenuated over time. The difference in performance between class A limes was relatively minor (0.5 pH units), if applied based on CCE. Chemical purity (Ca%, CCE) was the main factor controlling liming effectiveness and particle fineness only related to the short-term reaction (4–7 days). Granulated limes showed the poorest performance in terms of pH correction attributed to poor solubility and spatial zonation of liming effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石灰来源、细度和造粒对土壤pH值中和的影响
目前,关于南非各种当地石灰来源和产品的石灰化效率的信息很少。近年来,颗粒状微细石灰作为优于A类石灰的产品被广泛销售。因此,本研究的目的是比较在两种不同的酸性土壤(砂和壤土)的受控条件下,各种本地的、市售的水合石灰、钙质石灰和白云岩石灰来源(即来自不同采石场)和形式(A类、微细粒和粒状微细粒)随时间(365天)增加土壤pH值的有效性。采用碳酸钙当量(CCE)调整后的石灰材料,以达到pHKCl为5.5的目标,并在85%的现场容量下孵育。微细钙质石灰和水合石灰的pH值增长最快(前30-60天),但随着时间的推移,这些材料与A类石灰之间的差异逐渐减弱。如果基于CCE应用,A类石灰的性能差异相对较小(0.5 pH单位)。化学纯度(Ca%, CCE)是石灰化效果的主要控制因素,颗粒细度仅与短期反应(4 ~ 7 d)有关。颗粒石灰的pH校正效果最差,主要是由于溶解度差和石灰效果的空间分带性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
The impact of planting dates and hybrid selection on sunflower seed yield and oil content Comparison of the effectiveness of mined and by-product South African gypsums and other calcium sources for soil sodicity remediation Nutrient uptake and yield response of wheat ( Triticum spp.) to different fertiliser applications in Ethiopia Transpiration efficiency of lucerne under unlimited soil water conditions during the first growing season Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1