Australian corporate real estate lease reporting ahead of IFRS 16

IF 0.8 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pacific Rim Property Research Journal Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/14445921.2021.1883835
C. Heywood
{"title":"Australian corporate real estate lease reporting ahead of IFRS 16","authors":"C. Heywood","doi":"10.1080/14445921.2021.1883835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To improve the transparency of companies’ financial commitments the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 16 requires companies to report their leased corporate real estate (CRE) on their balance sheets from 1 January 2019. This paper reports Australian CRE balance sheet lease reporting ahead of IFRS 16. This is the first time this has been reported and is also a baseline to evaluate how it changes Australian CRE reporting. 2016 Annual Reports were content analysed to identify current practices with the selected period pre-dating any effects from the standard’s introduction. Detail was limited, other than recording lease expenses. To calculate possible effects of including leased CRE these expenses were capitalised as a proxy for the standard’s methods. Indicative upper and lower end capitalisation rates added between $127.7 billion and $397.0 billion to balance sheets equating to 2.5% and 7.7% (respectively) of the owned PP&E. This also represents an additional 178.6% to 555.2% of current real estate only values. The individual sectors varied but the smallest increase exceeded 100% and the largest increase exceeded 4,000%. This clarifies past assertions about the standard’s effects on CRE Management, but it is still unclear whether IFRS 16 changes tenure preferences towards ownership.","PeriodicalId":44302,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14445921.2021.1883835","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2021.1883835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT To improve the transparency of companies’ financial commitments the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 16 requires companies to report their leased corporate real estate (CRE) on their balance sheets from 1 January 2019. This paper reports Australian CRE balance sheet lease reporting ahead of IFRS 16. This is the first time this has been reported and is also a baseline to evaluate how it changes Australian CRE reporting. 2016 Annual Reports were content analysed to identify current practices with the selected period pre-dating any effects from the standard’s introduction. Detail was limited, other than recording lease expenses. To calculate possible effects of including leased CRE these expenses were capitalised as a proxy for the standard’s methods. Indicative upper and lower end capitalisation rates added between $127.7 billion and $397.0 billion to balance sheets equating to 2.5% and 7.7% (respectively) of the owned PP&E. This also represents an additional 178.6% to 555.2% of current real estate only values. The individual sectors varied but the smallest increase exceeded 100% and the largest increase exceeded 4,000%. This clarifies past assertions about the standard’s effects on CRE Management, but it is still unclear whether IFRS 16 changes tenure preferences towards ownership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚企业房地产租赁报告在IFRS 16之前
为了提高公司财务承诺的透明度,国际财务报告准则(IFRS) 16要求公司从2019年1月1日起在其资产负债表上报告其租赁的企业房地产(CRE)。本文报告了在IFRS 16之前的澳大利亚CRE资产负债表租赁报告。这是第一次报道,也是评估它如何改变澳大利亚CRE报告的基线。对2016年年度报告进行了内容分析,以确定在标准引入之前的选定时期内的当前实践。除了记录租赁费用外,细节有限。为了计算包括租赁CRE的可能影响,这些费用被资本化,作为标准方法的代理。指示性的上限和下限资本化率在资产负债表上增加了1277亿至3970亿美元,分别相当于拥有的PP&E的2.5%和7.7%。这也代表了当前房地产价值的178.6%至555.2%。个别行业有所不同,但最小的增幅超过100%,最大的增幅超过4000%。这澄清了过去关于该准则对CRE管理影响的断言,但仍不清楚IFRS 16是否改变了对所有权的任期偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
A contrariant observation on assumed rising property values and value capture Feng Shui and superstition in Hong Kong’s residential housing market Housing construction materials and house rent trends in Ede, Nigeria On the American perception of real estate as business: revisiting the ontological project of Julian Diaz III Supply and demand approaches to the urban residential property prices determination; transactions evidence from Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1