Differentiation between Glioblastoma and Solitary Metastasis: Morphologic Assessment by Conventional Brain MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Bo-Young Jung, Eun Ja Lee, J. Bae, Young Jae Choi, Eun Kyoung Lee, Dae Bong Kim
{"title":"Differentiation between Glioblastoma and Solitary Metastasis: Morphologic Assessment by Conventional Brain MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging","authors":"Bo-Young Jung, Eun Ja Lee, J. Bae, Young Jae Choi, Eun Kyoung Lee, Dae Bong Kim","doi":"10.13104/IMRI.2021.25.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Differentiating between glioblastoma and solitary metastasis is very important for the planning of further workup and treatment. We assessed the ability of various morphological parameters using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques to distinguish between glioblastomas and solitary metastases in tumoral and peritumoral regions. Materials and Methods: We included 38 patients with solitary brain tumors (21 glioblastomas, 17 solitary metastases). To find out if there were differences in the morphologic parameters of enhancing tumors, we analyzed their shape, margins, and enhancement patterns on postcontrast T1-weighted images. During analyses of peritumoral regions, we assessed the extent of peritumoral non-enhancing lesion on T2- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. We also aimed to detect peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration by visual assessment of T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, including DWI, ADC maps, and exponential DWI, and evaluated which sequence depicted peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration most clearly. Results: The shapes, margins, and enhancement patterns of tumors all significantly differentiated glioblastomas from metastases. Glioblastomas had an irregular shape, ill-defined margins, and a heterogeneous enhancement pattern; on the other hand, metastases had an ovoid or round shape, well-defined margins, and homogeneous enhancement. Metastases had significantly more extensive peritumoral T2 high signal intensity than glioblastomas had. In visual assessment of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration using T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, all sequences differed significantly between the two groups. Exponential DWI had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of both glioblastoma (100%) and metastasis (70.6%). A combination of exponential DWI and ADC maps was optimal for the depiction of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in glioblastoma. Conclusion: In the differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions, visual morphologic assessment of tumoral and peritumoral regions using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques can also offer diagnostic information. when assessing peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in peritumoral non-enhancing lesions; lower imaging resolution by the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio of 1.5T MRI; the aforementioned T2-shine-through effect in DWI; reactive gliosis and infiltration into the surrounding tissue in the later-staged metastatic lesions.","PeriodicalId":73505,"journal":{"name":"Investigative magnetic resonance imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13104/IMRI.2021.25.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: Differentiating between glioblastoma and solitary metastasis is very important for the planning of further workup and treatment. We assessed the ability of various morphological parameters using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques to distinguish between glioblastomas and solitary metastases in tumoral and peritumoral regions. Materials and Methods: We included 38 patients with solitary brain tumors (21 glioblastomas, 17 solitary metastases). To find out if there were differences in the morphologic parameters of enhancing tumors, we analyzed their shape, margins, and enhancement patterns on postcontrast T1-weighted images. During analyses of peritumoral regions, we assessed the extent of peritumoral non-enhancing lesion on T2- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. We also aimed to detect peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration by visual assessment of T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, including DWI, ADC maps, and exponential DWI, and evaluated which sequence depicted peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration most clearly. Results: The shapes, margins, and enhancement patterns of tumors all significantly differentiated glioblastomas from metastases. Glioblastomas had an irregular shape, ill-defined margins, and a heterogeneous enhancement pattern; on the other hand, metastases had an ovoid or round shape, well-defined margins, and homogeneous enhancement. Metastases had significantly more extensive peritumoral T2 high signal intensity than glioblastomas had. In visual assessment of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration using T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, all sequences differed significantly between the two groups. Exponential DWI had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of both glioblastoma (100%) and metastasis (70.6%). A combination of exponential DWI and ADC maps was optimal for the depiction of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in glioblastoma. Conclusion: In the differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions, visual morphologic assessment of tumoral and peritumoral regions using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques can also offer diagnostic information. when assessing peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in peritumoral non-enhancing lesions; lower imaging resolution by the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio of 1.5T MRI; the aforementioned T2-shine-through effect in DWI; reactive gliosis and infiltration into the surrounding tissue in the later-staged metastatic lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胶质母细胞瘤与孤立性转移瘤的鉴别:常规脑磁共振成像和弥散加权成像的形态学评估
目的:区分胶质母细胞瘤和孤立性转移对于计划进一步的检查和治疗非常重要。我们使用常规MRI和基于扩散的技术评估了各种形态参数的能力,以区分肿瘤和肿瘤周围区域的胶质母细胞瘤和孤立性转移。材料和方法:我们纳入了38例孤立性脑肿瘤患者(21例胶质母细胞瘤,17例孤立性转移瘤)。为了找出增强肿瘤的形态学参数是否存在差异,我们在增强后T1加权图像上分析了它们的形状、边缘和增强模式。在分析肿瘤周围区域的过程中,我们在T2和对比后T1加权图像上评估了肿瘤周围非增强病变的程度。我们还旨在通过T2加权和基于扩散的图像(包括DWI、ADC图和指数DWI)的视觉评估来检测肿瘤周围肿瘤细胞浸润,并评估哪种序列最清楚地描述了肿瘤周围肿瘤肿瘤细胞浸润。结果:肿瘤的形状、边缘和增强模式均能显著区分胶质母细胞瘤和转移瘤。胶质母细胞瘤形状不规则,边缘不清晰,呈异质性增强模式;另一方面,转移灶呈卵圆形或圆形,边缘清晰,均匀增强。转移瘤的瘤周T2高信号强度明显高于胶质母细胞瘤。在使用T2加权和基于扩散的图像对肿瘤周围肿瘤细胞浸润进行视觉评估时,两组之间的所有序列都有显著差异。指数DWI对胶质母细胞瘤(100%)和转移瘤(70.6%)的诊断灵敏度最高。指数DWI和ADC图的组合最适合描述胶质母细胞癌的瘤周肿瘤细胞浸润。结论:在区分胶质母细胞瘤和孤立性转移性病变时,使用常规MRI和基于扩散的技术对肿瘤和肿瘤周围区域进行视觉形态学评估也可以提供诊断信息。当评估肿瘤周围非增强病变中的肿瘤周围肿瘤细胞浸润时;1.5T MRI相对较低的信噪比降低了成像分辨率;DWI中的上述T2穿透效应;在晚期转移性病变中,反应性胶质增生和浸润到周围组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of Ultrashort Echo Time T2* Mapping in Comparison With T2 Mapping for Quantitative Evaluation of Meniscal Degeneration Clinical Utility of Limited T2-Weighted-Only Lumbar Spine MRI in Pain Intervention Clinics Leiomyosarcoma of the Scrotum: A Case Report A Novel Magnetic Resonance Quality Assurance Phantom (KMRP-4): Multi-Site Comparison With the American College of Radiology Phantom Neuroimaging of Tactile Information Processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1