Policy in Community-Based Environmental Conservation and Protection: A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Indonesia

Diah Fitri Ekarini, R. Koestoer
{"title":"Policy in Community-Based Environmental Conservation and Protection: A Comparative Study Between Brazil and Indonesia","authors":"Diah Fitri Ekarini, R. Koestoer","doi":"10.14710/jwl.10.1.1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based environmental conservation and protection is one form of decentralization in the management of an area. Community-based initiatives are considered a sustainable collaborative alternative. The implementation of community-based initiatives can be found in various countries, such as the Voluntary Environmental Agents (VEA) in Amazon, Brazil and Social Forestry (SF) in Indonesia. This study aims to review the lessons learned from the CBC successful practice of VEA Program in Amazon, Brazil; determine whether these lessons can be adapted to enhance the positive impact of SF implementation in Indonesia, and; formulate relevant recommendations for SF implementation in Indonesia. A qualitative approach with descriptive-comparative method on references that are relevant to VEA and SF implementation was used in this study. There are several conditions that contribute to the successful VEA implementation: strengthening of local community initiatives, institutions, and capacities; formalization of community-based conservation schemes with supportive regulations; effective control system of the state; continuous support from external institutions, and; continuous and independent financing of activities. These conditions are relevant to be implemented in Indonesia. There is a fundamental difference between the implementation of VEA in Brazil and SF in Indonesia. Community-based initiatives in Brazil prioritized environmental sustainability to be able to “leverage” community’s economic and social sustainability in long term, while practices in Indonesia did not reflect this. This is illustrated by: lack of public awareness and concern for long-term environmental sustainability; negative impacts on the environment from SF implementation, and; vision of SF implementation which tends to be based on short-term targets.","PeriodicalId":31256,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.10.1.1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Community-based environmental conservation and protection is one form of decentralization in the management of an area. Community-based initiatives are considered a sustainable collaborative alternative. The implementation of community-based initiatives can be found in various countries, such as the Voluntary Environmental Agents (VEA) in Amazon, Brazil and Social Forestry (SF) in Indonesia. This study aims to review the lessons learned from the CBC successful practice of VEA Program in Amazon, Brazil; determine whether these lessons can be adapted to enhance the positive impact of SF implementation in Indonesia, and; formulate relevant recommendations for SF implementation in Indonesia. A qualitative approach with descriptive-comparative method on references that are relevant to VEA and SF implementation was used in this study. There are several conditions that contribute to the successful VEA implementation: strengthening of local community initiatives, institutions, and capacities; formalization of community-based conservation schemes with supportive regulations; effective control system of the state; continuous support from external institutions, and; continuous and independent financing of activities. These conditions are relevant to be implemented in Indonesia. There is a fundamental difference between the implementation of VEA in Brazil and SF in Indonesia. Community-based initiatives in Brazil prioritized environmental sustainability to be able to “leverage” community’s economic and social sustainability in long term, while practices in Indonesia did not reflect this. This is illustrated by: lack of public awareness and concern for long-term environmental sustainability; negative impacts on the environment from SF implementation, and; vision of SF implementation which tends to be based on short-term targets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以社区为基础的环境保护政策:巴西与印度尼西亚的比较研究
以社区为基础的环境养护和保护是一个地区管理权力下放的一种形式。以社区为基础的倡议被认为是一种可持续的合作选择。以社区为基础的倡议在许多国家都有实施,例如巴西亚马逊地区的自愿环境机构(VEA)和印度尼西亚的社会林业(SF)。本研究旨在回顾CBC在巴西亚马逊地区开展的VEA项目的成功实践;确定是否可以借鉴这些经验教训,以增强在印度尼西亚实施顺丰的积极影响;制定在印尼实施顺丰的相关建议。本研究采用定性方法和描述性比较法对VEA和SF实施相关的参考文献进行分析。成功实施VEA有几个条件:加强地方社区倡议、机构和能力;使以社区为基础的保护计划正式化,并制定支持性条例;有效的国家控制体系;外部机构的持续支持;以及;活动的持续和独立融资。这些条件与在印度尼西亚实施有关。在巴西实施VEA和在印度尼西亚实施SF之间存在根本性差异。巴西以社区为基础的倡议优先考虑环境可持续性,以便能够长期“利用”社区的经济和社会可持续性,而印度尼西亚的做法没有反映这一点。这表现在:公众缺乏对长期环境可持续性的认识和关注;实施顺丰对环境的负面影响;以及;SF实施的愿景往往基于短期目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potensi Serapan Karbon Inorganik pada Kawasan Karst Tropis di Karst Biduk-Biduk, Kalimantan Timur Potensi Penerapan Eco-City untuk Mitigasi Pandemi di Kota-Kota di Indonesia pada Masa Depan Penataan Ruang Wilayah Pesisir sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Bencana Tsunami di Pantai Watu Pecak, Kabupaten Lumajang Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor Konsep Pengembangan Desa Wisata Pesisir Tangguh Bencana Berbasis Perencanaan Ruang [Studi Kasus: Desa Kunjir, Kabupaten Lampung Selatan]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1