#blacklgbtqlivesmatter: The Intersectionality of Black and LGBTQ+ Rights Movements on Twitter in Honor of Dominique “Rem’mie” Fells, Riah Milton, Egypt Powers, Brayla Stone, and Merci Mack

IF 0.5 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08952833.2023.2208427
Valerie A. Handley, Megan Story Chavez, S. Jordan, Colton Story
{"title":"#blacklgbtqlivesmatter: The Intersectionality of Black and LGBTQ+ Rights Movements on Twitter in Honor of Dominique “Rem’mie” Fells, Riah Milton, Egypt Powers, Brayla Stone, and Merci Mack","authors":"Valerie A. Handley, Megan Story Chavez, S. Jordan, Colton Story","doi":"10.1080/08952833.2023.2208427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Both Black Lives Matter (BLM) and LGBTQ+ rights movements have a history of fighting for social justice. Often, these movements are two separate movements that do not provide inclusivity for those that hold Black and queer identities. This study examined Twitter users’ perceptions of the rights of individuals with intersecting identities during the BLM and LGBTQ+ rights movements through the qualitative method of thematic analysis. Researchers reviewed publicly available data to answer the question: What were Twitter users’ perceptions of the rights and treatment of individuals with intersecting identities during the Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ rights movements during June of 2020? The sample included 397 tweets identified through the hashtags “blackLGBTQ,” “blacktranslivesmatter,” and “blackLGBTQlivesmatter.” The results showed 495 codes with three themes of fellowship, motivation for justice, and pursual of justice with seven sub-themes. Results demonstrated the imperative need to address intersectionality in both research and clinical arenas. Data from these Twitter users seemed to reflect a desire to advocate for Black and LGBTQ+ rights and displayed wishes to acknowledge, affirm, and celebrate individuals’ intersecting identities. This also included the importance of individuals gaining greater understanding and advocacy to support these communities.","PeriodicalId":44214,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","volume":"35 1","pages":"115 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2023.2208427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Both Black Lives Matter (BLM) and LGBTQ+ rights movements have a history of fighting for social justice. Often, these movements are two separate movements that do not provide inclusivity for those that hold Black and queer identities. This study examined Twitter users’ perceptions of the rights of individuals with intersecting identities during the BLM and LGBTQ+ rights movements through the qualitative method of thematic analysis. Researchers reviewed publicly available data to answer the question: What were Twitter users’ perceptions of the rights and treatment of individuals with intersecting identities during the Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ rights movements during June of 2020? The sample included 397 tweets identified through the hashtags “blackLGBTQ,” “blacktranslivesmatter,” and “blackLGBTQlivesmatter.” The results showed 495 codes with three themes of fellowship, motivation for justice, and pursual of justice with seven sub-themes. Results demonstrated the imperative need to address intersectionality in both research and clinical arenas. Data from these Twitter users seemed to reflect a desire to advocate for Black and LGBTQ+ rights and displayed wishes to acknowledge, affirm, and celebrate individuals’ intersecting identities. This also included the importance of individuals gaining greater understanding and advocacy to support these communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#blacklgbtqlivesmatter:推特上黑人和LGBTQ+权利运动的交叉性,以纪念多米尼克·“雷米”·费尔斯、丽亚·米尔顿、埃及·鲍尔斯、布雷拉·斯通和麦茜·麦克
摘要黑人生命攸关(BLM)和LGBTQ+权利运动都有为社会正义而战的历史。通常,这些运动是两个独立的运动,并没有为那些持有黑人和酷儿身份的人提供包容性。本研究通过主题分析的定性方法,考察了推特用户在BLM和LGBTQ+权利运动期间对具有交叉身份的个人权利的看法。研究人员审查了公开的数据来回答这个问题:在2020年6月的黑人生命攸关和LGBTQ+权利运动中,推特用户对具有交叉身份的个人的权利和待遇有何看法?该样本包括397条通过标签“blackLGBTQ”、“blacktranslivesmatter”和“blackLGBT直播smatter”识别的推文。结果显示,495条代码包含三个主题,即友谊、正义动机和追求正义,共有七个子主题。研究结果表明,迫切需要解决研究和临床领域的交叉性问题。来自这些推特用户的数据似乎反映了倡导黑人和LGBTQ+权利的愿望,并表达了承认、肯定和庆祝个人交叉身份的愿望。这也包括个人获得更多理解和宣传以支持这些社区的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy provides an international forum to further explore the relationship between feminist theory and family therapy theory and practice. The journal presents thought-provoking and insightful articles of a theoretical nature, as well as articles focusing on empirical research and clinical application. The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy critiques family therapy concepts from a feminist perspective with careful attention to cultural, class, and racial differences, applies a feminist-sensitive perspective to the treatment issues particular to women such as depression, agoraphobia, eating disorders, incest, and domestic abuse, etc.
期刊最新文献
E-mail About Breast Cancer Social Location, Power, and Disadvantage: Experiences of MFT Faculty Grief Process and Support Systems for Military Widows Grief Process and Support Systems for Military Widows “Testing the Waters” in a “World That Refuses to Make Space: Development and Coming Out with Transgender and Non-Binary Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1