The Internet and public policy: Future directions

IF 4.1 1区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Policy and Internet Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1002/poi3.263

H. Margetts, V. Lehdonvirta, Sandra González-Bailón, J. Hutchinson, Jonathan Bright, Vicki Nash, David Sutcliffe

引用次数: 6

Abstract

In January 2021, the editorial team of Policy & Internet changed from the Oxford Internet Institute to the Department of Media and Communications at the University of Sydney. This article invites all the past and current editors to contribute to the future directions and discussion of internet and public policy. It is collection of six contributions covering the trajectory of the internet policy research agenda, platform power in the digital economy, algorithms and the need for transparency, media diversity and platform regulation, speech in the age of content moderation and age-gating the internet. The collection of essays highlights the past 10 years of the journal and paints a clear trajectory for the next era of Policy & Internet.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

互联网与公共政策：未来方向

2021年1月，《政策与互联网》的编辑团队从牛津互联网研究所改为悉尼大学媒体与传播系。本文邀请所有过去和现在的编辑为互联网和公共政策的未来方向和讨论做出贡献。它汇集了六篇文章，涵盖互联网政策研究议程的轨迹、数字经济中的平台力量、算法和透明度的必要性、媒体多样性和平台监管、内容节制时代的言论和互联网的年龄门控。这本论文集突出了该杂志过去10年的发展历程，并为下一个政策与互联网时代描绘了清晰的轨迹。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Policy and Internet Multiple-

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

10.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Understanding public policy in the age of the Internet requires understanding how individuals, organizations, governments and networks behave, and what motivates them in this new environment. Technological innovation and internet-mediated interaction raise both challenges and opportunities for public policy: whether in areas that have received much work already (e.g. digital divides, digital government, and privacy) or newer areas, like regulation of data-intensive technologies and platforms, the rise of precarious labour, and regulatory responses to misinformation and hate speech. We welcome innovative research in areas where the Internet already impacts public policy, where it raises new challenges or dilemmas, or provides opportunities for policy that is smart and equitable. While we welcome perspectives from any academic discipline, we look particularly for insight that can feed into social science disciplines like political science, public administration, economics, sociology, and communication. We welcome articles that introduce methodological innovation, theoretical development, or rigorous data analysis concerning a particular question or problem of public policy.