External validation of the Oakland score to assess safe hospital discharge among adult patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.1177/10249079231175434
Ho Yin Fong
{"title":"External validation of the Oakland score to assess safe hospital discharge among adult patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong","authors":"Ho Yin Fong","doi":"10.1177/10249079231175434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To externally validate the use of the Oakland score in identification of low-risk lower gastrointestinal bleeding patients who can be safely managed without hospitalisation in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong. This single-centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients who attended the accident and emergency department for lower gastrointestinal bleeding and were subsequently admitted to hospital from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. Safe discharge was defined as absence of all of the following adverse outcomes after hospital presentation: blood transfusion; therapeutic colonoscopy, mesenteric embolisation, or laparotomy for bleeding; in-hospital death (all causes); and readmission with subsequent lower gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 days. The sensitivities, specificities and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the Oakland score were calculated. Among 376 patients who were included in this study, 114 (30.3%) of them experienced one or more adverse outcomes. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for safe discharge was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91). Using an Oakland score threshold of ⩽8 points as in the original derivation study can achieve 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 96.8%–100%) and 7.3% specificity (95% confidence interval, 4.4%–11.1%) for safe discharge. When the Oakland score threshold was extended to ⩽11 points, a much greater proportion of low-risk patients could be identified, with 97.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 92.5%–99.5%) and 32.8% specificity (95% confidence interval, 27.2%–38.9%) for safe discharge. The Oakland score performed well in identification of lower gastrointestinal bleeding patients who were at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes and could thus be safely managed without hospitalisation. Extension of the Oakland score threshold to ⩽11 points can allow identification of a greater proportion of low-risk patients while sensitivity is reasonably maintained.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10249079231175434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To externally validate the use of the Oakland score in identification of low-risk lower gastrointestinal bleeding patients who can be safely managed without hospitalisation in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong. This single-centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients who attended the accident and emergency department for lower gastrointestinal bleeding and were subsequently admitted to hospital from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020. Safe discharge was defined as absence of all of the following adverse outcomes after hospital presentation: blood transfusion; therapeutic colonoscopy, mesenteric embolisation, or laparotomy for bleeding; in-hospital death (all causes); and readmission with subsequent lower gastrointestinal bleeding within 28 days. The sensitivities, specificities and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the Oakland score were calculated. Among 376 patients who were included in this study, 114 (30.3%) of them experienced one or more adverse outcomes. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for safe discharge was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91). Using an Oakland score threshold of ⩽8 points as in the original derivation study can achieve 100% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 96.8%–100%) and 7.3% specificity (95% confidence interval, 4.4%–11.1%) for safe discharge. When the Oakland score threshold was extended to ⩽11 points, a much greater proportion of low-risk patients could be identified, with 97.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 92.5%–99.5%) and 32.8% specificity (95% confidence interval, 27.2%–38.9%) for safe discharge. The Oakland score performed well in identification of lower gastrointestinal bleeding patients who were at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes and could thus be safely managed without hospitalisation. Extension of the Oakland score threshold to ⩽11 points can allow identification of a greater proportion of low-risk patients while sensitivity is reasonably maintained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥克兰评分评估香港急诊科成年急性下消化道出血患者出院安全的外部验证
从外部验证奥克兰评分在识别低风险下消化道出血患者中的使用,这些患者可以在香港的急诊科安全管理而无需住院。这项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间因下消化道出血到急诊科就诊并随后住院的成年患者。安全出院定义为住院后没有以下所有不良后果:输血;治疗性结肠镜检查、肠系膜栓塞或剖腹手术治疗出血;院内死亡(各种原因);28天内再次入院并出现下消化道出血。计算奥克兰评分的敏感性、特异性和接受者-操作特征曲线下的面积。在纳入本研究的376例患者中,114例(30.3%)出现了一种或多种不良结局。安全放电的受者-工作特征曲线下面积为0.88(95%可信区间为0.84 ~ 0.91)。与原始衍生研究一样,使用奥克兰评分阈值为≥8点,可实现安全出院的100%敏感性(95%置信区间,96.8%-100%)和7.3%特异性(95%置信区间,4.4%-11.1%)。当奥克兰评分阈值扩大到≥11分时,可以识别出更大比例的低危患者,安全出院的敏感性为97.4%(95%置信区间,92.5% ~ 99.5%),特异性为32.8%(95%置信区间,27.2% ~ 38.9%)。奥克兰评分在识别下消化道出血患者方面表现良好,这些患者经历不良后果的风险较低,因此可以在不住院的情况下安全管理。将奥克兰评分阈值扩展到≥11分,可以在合理保持敏感性的情况下识别出更大比例的低风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical ventilation management and airway pressure release ventilation practice in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey of intensive care unit clinicians in mainland China Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments Questionnaire survey on point‐of‐care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest among emergency physicians in Hong Kong Burnout in emergency physicians in Hong Kong—A cross‐sectional study on its prevalence, associated factors, and impact Factors for predicting 28‐day mortality in older patients with suspected of having sepsis in the emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1