Educator understanding of self-regulation and implications for classroom facilitation: A mixed methods study

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Early Childhood Research Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.1177/1476718x231186613
Casey C Burgess
{"title":"Educator understanding of self-regulation and implications for classroom facilitation: A mixed methods study","authors":"Casey C Burgess","doi":"10.1177/1476718x231186613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing concern about the mental health and resilience of today’s children and difficulties with self-regulation are implicated in educational outcomes, cognitive problems, internalizing problems such as depression and anxiety, externalizing problems such as aggression, and physical health problems. Self-regulation is a growing topic of interest in a variety of disciplines and there are 447 different interpretations of what self-regulation means in the literature, which makes it difficult for educators to interpret and apply it in their classrooms. Due to advances in neuroscience, the Ontario Ministry of Education shifted toward a neurophysiological framework for the Self-Regulation and Well-Being Frame of the Kindergarten Program. The current study examined which frameworks Ontario kindergarten educators were using by analyzing the ways they described and facilitated self-regulation in the classroom through surveys, interviews, report cards, and classroom observations. Findings revealed that educators: have little experience and training with resources aligned with the Kindergarten Program’s approach to self-regulation, describe self-regulation as self-control, and facilitate self-regulation using a learning strategies approach. Educators were observed using fewer than a third of ministry self-regulation recommendations in the classroom. Implications and recommendations for aligning educator practices with the Kindergarten Program’s framework are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718x231186613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing concern about the mental health and resilience of today’s children and difficulties with self-regulation are implicated in educational outcomes, cognitive problems, internalizing problems such as depression and anxiety, externalizing problems such as aggression, and physical health problems. Self-regulation is a growing topic of interest in a variety of disciplines and there are 447 different interpretations of what self-regulation means in the literature, which makes it difficult for educators to interpret and apply it in their classrooms. Due to advances in neuroscience, the Ontario Ministry of Education shifted toward a neurophysiological framework for the Self-Regulation and Well-Being Frame of the Kindergarten Program. The current study examined which frameworks Ontario kindergarten educators were using by analyzing the ways they described and facilitated self-regulation in the classroom through surveys, interviews, report cards, and classroom observations. Findings revealed that educators: have little experience and training with resources aligned with the Kindergarten Program’s approach to self-regulation, describe self-regulation as self-control, and facilitate self-regulation using a learning strategies approach. Educators were observed using fewer than a third of ministry self-regulation recommendations in the classroom. Implications and recommendations for aligning educator practices with the Kindergarten Program’s framework are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育者对自我调节的理解及其对课堂促进的影响:一项混合方法研究
人们越来越关注当今儿童的心理健康和恢复能力,自我调节的困难与教育结果、认知问题、抑郁和焦虑等内化问题、攻击性等外化问题以及身体健康问题有关。自我调节是各个学科越来越感兴趣的话题,文献中对自我调节的含义有447种不同的解释,这使得教育工作者很难在课堂上解释和应用它。由于神经科学的进步,安大略省教育部转向幼儿园项目自我调节和幸福框架的神经生理学框架。目前的研究通过分析安大略省幼儿园教育工作者通过调查、访谈、成绩单和课堂观察来描述和促进课堂自我调节的方式,考察了他们正在使用哪些框架。调查结果显示,教育工作者:对与幼儿园项目自我调节方法相一致的资源缺乏经验和培训,将自我调节描述为自我控制,并使用学习策略方法促进自我调节。据观察,教育工作者在课堂上使用的部委自律建议不到三分之一。讨论了将教育工作者的实践与幼儿园计划的框架相结合的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Research
Journal of Early Childhood Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Research provides an international forum for the dissemination of early childhood research which transcends disciplinary boundaries and applies theory and research within academic and professional communities. The journal reflects international growth in research on young children’s learning and development and the impact of this on provision. The journal enjoys a wide readership which includes policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in the intersecting fields of early childhood education and care, with early childhood defined as the years from birth to eight.
期刊最新文献
‘Maybe that makes a difference actually’: Attuning to praxis for anti-racist social justice leadership among nursery school head teachers in the UK A model for play in the preschool curriculum: A phenomenological study Skin deep: A review of early childhood policy affordances for anti-racist practice in England and Scotland Before race: A literature review on de/colonial habits in play within early childhood Playing with open-ended material as experiences of democracy: The Waldorf case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1