Relationship Between Caregiver Burden and Cognitive Impairment in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Sorur Javanmardifard, F. Shirazi, S. Jamalnia, E. Sadeghi
{"title":"Relationship Between Caregiver Burden and Cognitive Impairment in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Sorur Javanmardifard, F. Shirazi, S. Jamalnia, E. Sadeghi","doi":"10.32598/jhnm.32.3.2207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Caregivers play a critical role in health management of patients with chronic diseases. Caregiving is associated with experiencing different emotional and psychological problems. Objective: This study aims to determine the relationship between caregiver burden and cognitive function in adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 215 family caregivers of adult patients with T2D were selected by a systematic random sampling method. A socio-demographic form, the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman’s rho correlation test. The multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine the power of Cognitive Impairment (CI) in predicting the caregiver burden. P<0.05 was considered as the statistically significance level. Results: The mean age of caregivers and patients were 48±9 and 52±2 years, respectively. The mean score of CBI was 24.57±18.2, indicating a moderate level of caregiver burden. The mean score of MMSE was 25.25±3.6, indicating a mild CI in patients. Caregiver burden showed a significant correlation with cognitive function (r=-0.336, 95% CI; 0.53–0.89, P=0.001) such that the decreased CI was associated with an increase in total caregiver burden (r=-0.348, 95% CI; 0.43–0.87, P=0.001). The regression results showed that the CI levels were not predictors of caregiver burden severity. Conclusion: The CI of patients with T2D may affect their caregivers’ burden. Therefore, assessing the cognitive function of these patients can help healthcare providers conduct interventions to enhance the caregivers’ quality of life.","PeriodicalId":36020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jhnm.32.3.2207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Caregivers play a critical role in health management of patients with chronic diseases. Caregiving is associated with experiencing different emotional and psychological problems. Objective: This study aims to determine the relationship between caregiver burden and cognitive function in adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 215 family caregivers of adult patients with T2D were selected by a systematic random sampling method. A socio-demographic form, the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman’s rho correlation test. The multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine the power of Cognitive Impairment (CI) in predicting the caregiver burden. P<0.05 was considered as the statistically significance level. Results: The mean age of caregivers and patients were 48±9 and 52±2 years, respectively. The mean score of CBI was 24.57±18.2, indicating a moderate level of caregiver burden. The mean score of MMSE was 25.25±3.6, indicating a mild CI in patients. Caregiver burden showed a significant correlation with cognitive function (r=-0.336, 95% CI; 0.53–0.89, P=0.001) such that the decreased CI was associated with an increase in total caregiver burden (r=-0.348, 95% CI; 0.43–0.87, P=0.001). The regression results showed that the CI levels were not predictors of caregiver burden severity. Conclusion: The CI of patients with T2D may affect their caregivers’ burden. Therefore, assessing the cognitive function of these patients can help healthcare providers conduct interventions to enhance the caregivers’ quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人2型糖尿病患者护理人员负担与认知障碍的关系
引言:护理人员在慢性病患者的健康管理中发挥着至关重要的作用。照顾与经历不同的情绪和心理问题有关。目的:本研究旨在确定成年2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的护理负担与认知功能之间的关系。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,通过系统随机抽样方法选择215名成年T2D患者的家庭护理人员。数据收集采用社会人口学形式,即护理人员负担量表(CBI)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Spearman的rho相关检验对数据进行分析。多项逻辑回归模型用于检验认知障碍(CI)在预测照顾者负担方面的能力。P<0.05为具有统计学意义的水平。结果:护理人员和患者的平均年龄分别为48±9岁和52±2岁。CBI的平均得分为24.57±18.2,表明护理人员负担处于中等水平。MMSE的平均得分为25.25±3.6,表明患者存在轻度CI。照顾者负担与认知功能显著相关(r=-0.336,95%CI;0.53-0.89,P=0.001),因此CI降低与总照顾者负担增加有关(r=-0.348,95%CI)。0.43-0.87,P=0.001。回归结果表明,CI水平不能预测照顾者负担的严重程度。结论:T2D患者的CI可能影响其照顾者的负担。因此,评估这些患者的认知功能可以帮助医疗保健提供者进行干预,以提高护理人员的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery
Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Third-and Fourth-degree Perineal Tears During Vaginal Delivery Among Women in Qom, Iran The Effect of Modulating Environmental Stimuli on Pain Experience in Premature Infants During Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-port Implantation Effect of Existential Group Therapy on Infertility Stress in Infertile Men’s Spouses Factors Affecting the Intention of Healthcare Providers in Responding to Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review Relationship Between Personality Traits and Health Anxiety Among Nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1