Identifying Future Vehicle Safety Priority Areas in Australia for the Light Vehicle Fleet

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Road Safety-JRS Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.33492/jrs-d-21-00001
L. Budd, S. Newstead
{"title":"Identifying Future Vehicle Safety Priority Areas in Australia for the Light Vehicle Fleet","authors":"L. Budd, S. Newstead","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-21-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formulating priorities for future road safety strategies requires supporting analysis to predict what the future crash population will look like and to assess how the countermeasures either already in place or planned will address the crash problems forecast. This analysis aimed to identify future priority action areas for light vehicle safety by identifying crash types that will not be fully addressed in the future by projected improvements in active and passive safety in the Australian light vehicle fleet. The future crash profile was modelled from 2017 to 2030 using crash data from 5 Australian jurisdictions overlayed with available evidence on vehicle safety feature fitment and effectiveness. The methodology can be applied to larger sets of safety technologies when sufficient evidence and supporting crash data become available. Three future vehicle safety priority areas were identified from the analysis: (i) fatal pedestrian crashes, (ii) single vehicle frontal crashes with objects, and (iii) front-to-front vehicle crashes both at intersections and midblocks, and front-to-side impacts at intersections including straight crossing path and right turn across path crash types. These crash types were projected to be the largest contributors to fatalities by 2030. Projections showed that remaining crash types in 2030 will be poorly addressed by current vehicle safety technologies such as autonomous emergency braking, lane departure warning and electronic stability control. Future vehicle safety policy priorities should address these crash types through the development of additional or enhanced vehicle safety technologies and where vehicle safety technology proves inadequate other countermeasures such as road infrastructure treatments and appropriate speed limit setting for high risk environments that address the key crash types remaining in the system.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-21-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Formulating priorities for future road safety strategies requires supporting analysis to predict what the future crash population will look like and to assess how the countermeasures either already in place or planned will address the crash problems forecast. This analysis aimed to identify future priority action areas for light vehicle safety by identifying crash types that will not be fully addressed in the future by projected improvements in active and passive safety in the Australian light vehicle fleet. The future crash profile was modelled from 2017 to 2030 using crash data from 5 Australian jurisdictions overlayed with available evidence on vehicle safety feature fitment and effectiveness. The methodology can be applied to larger sets of safety technologies when sufficient evidence and supporting crash data become available. Three future vehicle safety priority areas were identified from the analysis: (i) fatal pedestrian crashes, (ii) single vehicle frontal crashes with objects, and (iii) front-to-front vehicle crashes both at intersections and midblocks, and front-to-side impacts at intersections including straight crossing path and right turn across path crash types. These crash types were projected to be the largest contributors to fatalities by 2030. Projections showed that remaining crash types in 2030 will be poorly addressed by current vehicle safety technologies such as autonomous emergency braking, lane departure warning and electronic stability control. Future vehicle safety policy priorities should address these crash types through the development of additional or enhanced vehicle safety technologies and where vehicle safety technology proves inadequate other countermeasures such as road infrastructure treatments and appropriate speed limit setting for high risk environments that address the key crash types remaining in the system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定澳大利亚轻型车队未来车辆安全优先领域
制定未来道路安全战略的优先事项需要进行支持性分析,以预测未来的车祸人群,并评估已经到位或计划好的应对措施将如何解决预测的车祸问题。该分析旨在通过识别碰撞类型来确定轻型车辆安全的未来优先行动领域,而澳大利亚轻型车队的主动和被动安全方面的预期改进在未来不会完全解决这些碰撞类型。2017年至2030年,使用澳大利亚5个司法管辖区的碰撞数据对未来的碰撞情况进行了建模,这些数据覆盖了车辆安全功能安装和有效性的可用证据。当有足够的证据和支持碰撞的数据可用时,该方法可以应用于更大的安全技术。从分析中确定了三个未来车辆安全优先领域:(i)致命的行人碰撞,(ii)单车与物体正面碰撞,以及(iii)交叉口和中间街区的正面到正面车辆碰撞,以及交叉口的正面到侧面碰撞,包括直行交叉道和右转交叉道碰撞类型。预计到2030年,这些事故类型将成为造成死亡人数最多的事故。预测显示,目前的车辆安全技术,如自动紧急制动、车道偏离警告和电子稳定控制,将很难解决2030年剩余的碰撞类型。未来的车辆安全政策优先事项应通过开发额外或增强的车辆安全技术来解决这些碰撞类型,并且在车辆安全技术证明不充分的情况下,应采取其他对策,如道路基础设施处理和针对高风险环境的适当限速设置,以解决系统中剩余的关键碰撞类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Young Provisional Drivers Who Crash Early Compare With Those Who Only Crash Later? Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public Auckland Transport’s Mass Action Pedestrian Improvement Programme Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1