Analysis of the diagnosis and missed diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions by three-dimensional transvaginal sonography Render and tomographic ultrasound imaging

Qin Ye, E. Xue, Rongxi Liang, Jingjing Guo, Xueying Lin, Yan Wang
{"title":"Analysis of the diagnosis and missed diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions by three-dimensional transvaginal sonography Render and tomographic ultrasound imaging","authors":"Qin Ye, E. Xue, Rongxi Liang, Jingjing Guo, Xueying Lin, Yan Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190812-00478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the value of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography(3D-TVS) in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions(IUA) and to analyze the causes of the missed diagnosis. \n \n \nMethods \nForty-seven patients with IUA were examined by three-dimensional transvaginal sonography(3D-TVS), 3D volume imaging (Render imaging) and tomographic ultrasound imaging(TUI imaging) in the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2017 to July 2019. The abnormal echo data of the endometrium were recorded and analyzed, and the ultrasound diagnosis and hysteroscopic diagnosis were compared. \n \n \nResults \n3D-TVS correctly diagnosed IUA was accurate in the 39 cases whose ultrasound imaging showed an uneven thickness of endometrial echo with the uterine cavity line having different degrees of echo continuity interruption. The diagnostic accuracy rate was 83.0%(39/47). In the Render imaging, 7 cases showed endometrial echo with honeycomb change, 28 cases showed partial echo loss with irregular low echo zone or low echo, and 4 cases showed corneal disappearance of one side. In TUI imaging, the endometrium was partly thinned in varying degrees where echo continuity was interrupted with hypoechoic band-like changes in all 39 cases. Three of the 8 missed IUA cases showed slender endometrium with filiform or membranous adhesions, and the other 5 were patients with uterine endometrial polyps. \n \n \nConclusions \n3D-TVS, Render imaging and TUI imaging technology can display stereo images, which contributes to the better preoperative diagnosis and postoperative follow-up. Care should be taken to avoid missed diagnosis and to improve the diagnostic accuracy for IUA by the techniques. \n \n \nKey words: \nUltrasonography, transvaginal, three-dimensional; Intrauterine adhesions","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190812-00478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography(3D-TVS) in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions(IUA) and to analyze the causes of the missed diagnosis. Methods Forty-seven patients with IUA were examined by three-dimensional transvaginal sonography(3D-TVS), 3D volume imaging (Render imaging) and tomographic ultrasound imaging(TUI imaging) in the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2017 to July 2019. The abnormal echo data of the endometrium were recorded and analyzed, and the ultrasound diagnosis and hysteroscopic diagnosis were compared. Results 3D-TVS correctly diagnosed IUA was accurate in the 39 cases whose ultrasound imaging showed an uneven thickness of endometrial echo with the uterine cavity line having different degrees of echo continuity interruption. The diagnostic accuracy rate was 83.0%(39/47). In the Render imaging, 7 cases showed endometrial echo with honeycomb change, 28 cases showed partial echo loss with irregular low echo zone or low echo, and 4 cases showed corneal disappearance of one side. In TUI imaging, the endometrium was partly thinned in varying degrees where echo continuity was interrupted with hypoechoic band-like changes in all 39 cases. Three of the 8 missed IUA cases showed slender endometrium with filiform or membranous adhesions, and the other 5 were patients with uterine endometrial polyps. Conclusions 3D-TVS, Render imaging and TUI imaging technology can display stereo images, which contributes to the better preoperative diagnosis and postoperative follow-up. Care should be taken to avoid missed diagnosis and to improve the diagnostic accuracy for IUA by the techniques. Key words: Ultrasonography, transvaginal, three-dimensional; Intrauterine adhesions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经阴道三维超声显像与层析超声显像对宫腔粘连的诊断与漏诊分析
目的探讨经阴道三维超声(3D-TVS)对宫内粘连(IUA)的诊断价值,分析漏诊原因。方法2017年1月至2019年7月在福建医科大学协和医院对47例宫内节育器患者进行了经阴道三维超声(3D-TVS)、三维容积成像(Render imaging)和断层超声成像(TUI imaging)检查。对子宫内膜异常回声数据进行记录和分析,并与超声诊断和宫腔镜诊断进行比较。结果39例超声检查显示子宫内膜回声厚度不均匀,宫腔线回声连续性中断程度不同的患者,3D-TVS正确诊断IUA是准确的。诊断准确率为83.0%(39/47)。在Render成像中,7例显示子宫内膜回声呈蜂窝状变化,28例显示部分回声丢失,低回声区或低回声不规则,4例显示一侧角膜消失。在TUI成像中,39例患者的子宫内膜都有不同程度的部分变薄,回声连续性中断,出现低回声带状变化。8例宫内节育器漏诊病例中,有3例子宫内膜细长,有丝状或膜性粘连,另外5例为子宫内膜息肉。结论3D-TVS、Render成像和TUI成像技术可以显示立体图像,有助于更好的术前诊断和术后随访。应注意避免漏诊,并通过该技术提高IUA的诊断准确性。关键词:超声检查,经阴道,三维;宫内粘连
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1