Relocation Issues of Released and Acquitted at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of International Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqad012
Cécile Lecolle
{"title":"Relocation Issues of Released and Acquitted at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals","authors":"Cécile Lecolle","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the treatment of released and acquitted persons by international courts and tribunals (ICTs) has been one of the most neglected aspects of international criminal justice. The system rests on the cooperation of states with the ICTs. However, this cooperation when it exists, often ceases when the trial has ended. Regarding the objective of delivering justice, states appear to have either forgotten or refused to accept that both acquittals and the eventual release of convicted individuals are part of the process of criminal justice. Even states committed to international justice have denied protection against extradition to unsafe countries for acquitted and released persons, or declined to become host countries, grant asylum requests or take any steps to offer these former defendants and convicted persons a dignified life. This article explores the international legal frameworks applicable to the relocation of persons released or acquitted by ICTs. It specifically looks into the cases of the ad hoc tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC), the states parties’ general obligation under the statutes and rules to cooperate with the ICTs, and relevant principles of refugee law. The article explores some of the most recent issues relating to relocation that have shaken international criminal justice. At the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the recent striking failure to obtain the relocation of nine acquitted and released persons is examined as an emblematic and appalling example of the violation of these persons’ fundamental human rights, and the refusal of the international community to pursue justice in all its aspects. At the ICC, important issues of relocation have already arisen for acquitted and released persons, and the Court will urgently need agreements in this area. Importantly, it is necessary to recognize that, to protect the rights of these former defendants, the practical work of defence lawyers continues long after their clients’ release.","PeriodicalId":46732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the treatment of released and acquitted persons by international courts and tribunals (ICTs) has been one of the most neglected aspects of international criminal justice. The system rests on the cooperation of states with the ICTs. However, this cooperation when it exists, often ceases when the trial has ended. Regarding the objective of delivering justice, states appear to have either forgotten or refused to accept that both acquittals and the eventual release of convicted individuals are part of the process of criminal justice. Even states committed to international justice have denied protection against extradition to unsafe countries for acquitted and released persons, or declined to become host countries, grant asylum requests or take any steps to offer these former defendants and convicted persons a dignified life. This article explores the international legal frameworks applicable to the relocation of persons released or acquitted by ICTs. It specifically looks into the cases of the ad hoc tribunals and the International Criminal Court (ICC), the states parties’ general obligation under the statutes and rules to cooperate with the ICTs, and relevant principles of refugee law. The article explores some of the most recent issues relating to relocation that have shaken international criminal justice. At the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the recent striking failure to obtain the relocation of nine acquitted and released persons is examined as an emblematic and appalling example of the violation of these persons’ fundamental human rights, and the refusal of the international community to pursue justice in all its aspects. At the ICC, important issues of relocation have already arisen for acquitted and released persons, and the Court will urgently need agreements in this area. Importantly, it is necessary to recognize that, to protect the rights of these former defendants, the practical work of defence lawyers continues long after their clients’ release.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际刑事法院和法庭释放和无罪释放的重新安置问题
国际法院和法庭对获释和无罪释放人员待遇的研究一直是国际刑事司法中最被忽视的方面之一。该系统建立在各国与信通技术的合作之上。然而,这种合作在存在时,往往在审判结束时停止。关于伸张正义的目标,各国似乎忘记或拒绝接受无罪释放和最终释放被定罪者都是刑事司法程序的一部分。即使是致力于国际司法的国家也拒绝为无罪释放者提供保护,使其免于被引渡到不安全的国家,或拒绝成为东道国,拒绝批准庇护请求,或拒绝采取任何措施为这些前被告和被定罪者提供有尊严的生活。本文探讨了适用于因信息和通信技术而被释放或无罪释放人员重新安置的国际法律框架。它具体探讨了特设法庭和国际刑事法院的案件、缔约国根据规约和规则与信息和通信技术合作的一般义务以及难民法的相关原则。这篇文章探讨了一些最近与搬迁有关的问题,这些问题动摇了国际刑事司法。在卢旺达问题国际刑事法庭,最近9名被无罪释放和释放的人未能搬迁,这一事件被视为侵犯这些人的基本人权以及国际社会拒绝从各个方面伸张正义的一个典型和骇人听闻的例子。在国际刑院,已经出现了无罪释放者和获释者搬迁的重要问题,国际刑院迫切需要在这方面达成协议。重要的是,必须认识到,为了保护这些前被告的权利,辩护律师的实际工作在其当事人获释后很长一段时间仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Criminal Justice aims to promote a profound collective reflection on the new problems facing international law. Established by a group of distinguished criminal lawyers and international lawyers, the Journal addresses the major problems of justice from the angle of law, jurisprudence, criminology, penal philosophy, and the history of international judicial institutions. It is intended for graduate and post-graduate students, practitioners, academics, government officials, as well as the hundreds of people working for international criminal courts.
期刊最新文献
The Biological Weapons Amendment to the ICC Statute and National Provisions Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case Witnessing Ongwen The Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court as a Test of the Court’s Outreach Programming in Northern Uganda Targeted Sanctions as a Pathway to Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1