The Many Shades of Soviet Dissidence

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.1353/kri.2022.0013
Benjamin Nathans
{"title":"The Many Shades of Soviet Dissidence","authors":"Benjamin Nathans","doi":"10.1353/kri.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the preface to her field-transforming study The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual, first published in 1981 and currently in its third edition, Katerina Clark described the embarrassment she felt when revealing to colleagues the subject of her research. Are you delving into Platonov or Bulgakov, they would ask, or perhaps Pasternak or Solzhenitsyn? No? You mean ... you’re analyzing the Soviet Soviet novel? Those unreadable texts that slavishly follow the conventions of socialist realism? At this point, she wrote, her incredulous interlocutors would either “back out of the conversation or ... mutter words of sympathy and amazement.” “It is considered far more worthy,” Clark noted, “to write on dissidents.”1 What a difference 40 years make. To write about Soviet dissidents today is to risk seeming naive or, even worse, in thrall to a version of what the musicologist Richard Taruskin called “the Great Either/Or”: in this case, the Cold War view that in the Soviet Union an unbridgeable chasm separated gray, mendacious official culture from the vibrant, autonomous, truth-seeking","PeriodicalId":45639,"journal":{"name":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2022.0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the preface to her field-transforming study The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual, first published in 1981 and currently in its third edition, Katerina Clark described the embarrassment she felt when revealing to colleagues the subject of her research. Are you delving into Platonov or Bulgakov, they would ask, or perhaps Pasternak or Solzhenitsyn? No? You mean ... you’re analyzing the Soviet Soviet novel? Those unreadable texts that slavishly follow the conventions of socialist realism? At this point, she wrote, her incredulous interlocutors would either “back out of the conversation or ... mutter words of sympathy and amazement.” “It is considered far more worthy,” Clark noted, “to write on dissidents.”1 What a difference 40 years make. To write about Soviet dissidents today is to risk seeming naive or, even worse, in thrall to a version of what the musicologist Richard Taruskin called “the Great Either/Or”: in this case, the Cold War view that in the Soviet Union an unbridgeable chasm separated gray, mendacious official culture from the vibrant, autonomous, truth-seeking
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏联不满的多重阴影
卡特琳娜·克拉克(kataterina Clark)在她的领域转型研究《苏联小说:作为仪式的历史》(1981年首次出版,目前已是第三版)的序言中,描述了她向同事透露她的研究主题时感到的尴尬。他们会问,你是在研究普拉托诺夫或布尔加科夫,还是帕斯捷尔纳克或索尔仁尼琴?没有?你是说…你在分析苏联的小说?那些盲从社会主义现实主义惯例的晦涩文本?在这一点上,她写道,不相信她的对话者要么“退出对话,要么……低声说些同情和惊奇的话。“人们认为,”克拉克指出,“写持不同政见者更有价值。”“40年的变化真是太大了。今天,写苏联异见人士的文章可能会显得天真,或者更糟糕的是,会被音乐学家理查德·塔鲁斯金(Richard Taruskin)所说的“非此此非”(the Great非此此非)所束缚:在这里,这是冷战时期的观点,即在苏联,灰色、虚假的官方文化与充满活力、自主、寻求真相的文化之间存在着一道不可逾越的鸿沟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: A leading journal of Russian and Eurasian history and culture, Kritika is dedicated to internationalizing the field and making it relevant to a broad interdisciplinary audience. The journal regularly publishes forums, discussions, and special issues; it regularly translates important works by Russian and European scholars into English; and it publishes in every issue in-depth, lengthy review articles, review essays, and reviews of Russian, Eurasian, and European works that are rarely, if ever, reviewed in North American Russian studies journals.
期刊最新文献
An Elusive Consensus "The Duty of Perfect Obedience": The Laws of Subjecthood in Tsarist Russia Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History Revolutionary Reform, Stillborn Revolution Russian History Pre-1600: A Turn to a Postcolonial Perspective?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1