Eugenie Brinkema, Life-Destroying Diagrams, reviewed by Marissa C de Baca

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ART Journal of Visual Culture Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1177/14704129221125768
Marissa C. de Baca
{"title":"Eugenie Brinkema, Life-Destroying Diagrams, reviewed by Marissa C de Baca","authors":"Marissa C. de Baca","doi":"10.1177/14704129221125768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Akin to the teardrop that opens Eugenie Brinkema’s first work, The Forms of the Affects (2014), her latest book, Life-Destroying Diagrams, commences with another signifier bound to the body: the neck. Through the neck, Brinkema critiques how established scholarship such as Linda Williams’s (1991) body genres, Noël Carroll’s (1990) aesthetic philosophy of horror, or James Twitchell’s (1985) Dreadful Pleasures has thought through horror exclusively as a bodily affect: the sensations of a shiver or the goosebumps on skin. ‘I am done with the neck’, Brinkema states as her opening salvo against privileging the body and thus limiting affective interpretations of horror (p. 1). Brinkema’s ingenious solution to the body problem – or otherwise, when affective teleology is only thought through the body – is to rethink horror through form. Therefore grids, charts, diagrams, hexagons, lines, circles, or tempo are deployed to activate affective potential. Yet, as the author makes clear, this book is not about horror, but about reading affect from form. Consequently, Life-Destroying Diagrams reinstitutes Brinkema’s theory of radical formalism, which demands ‘a return to the speculative ground or roots of what thinking can claim’ by launching a text’s potential through ‘readings that proceed without guarantee’ (p. 21). What results in Life-Destroying Diagrams is a provocative and commanding intervention into aesthetic theory that can enliven what has already been preconceived within scholarship on horror and within the larger fields of Visual Culture Studies, Literary Studies, Cinema Studies, and Continental Philosophy.","PeriodicalId":45373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129221125768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Akin to the teardrop that opens Eugenie Brinkema’s first work, The Forms of the Affects (2014), her latest book, Life-Destroying Diagrams, commences with another signifier bound to the body: the neck. Through the neck, Brinkema critiques how established scholarship such as Linda Williams’s (1991) body genres, Noël Carroll’s (1990) aesthetic philosophy of horror, or James Twitchell’s (1985) Dreadful Pleasures has thought through horror exclusively as a bodily affect: the sensations of a shiver or the goosebumps on skin. ‘I am done with the neck’, Brinkema states as her opening salvo against privileging the body and thus limiting affective interpretations of horror (p. 1). Brinkema’s ingenious solution to the body problem – or otherwise, when affective teleology is only thought through the body – is to rethink horror through form. Therefore grids, charts, diagrams, hexagons, lines, circles, or tempo are deployed to activate affective potential. Yet, as the author makes clear, this book is not about horror, but about reading affect from form. Consequently, Life-Destroying Diagrams reinstitutes Brinkema’s theory of radical formalism, which demands ‘a return to the speculative ground or roots of what thinking can claim’ by launching a text’s potential through ‘readings that proceed without guarantee’ (p. 21). What results in Life-Destroying Diagrams is a provocative and commanding intervention into aesthetic theory that can enliven what has already been preconceived within scholarship on horror and within the larger fields of Visual Culture Studies, Literary Studies, Cinema Studies, and Continental Philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eugenie Brinkema,《毁灭生命的图表》,Marissa C de Baca评论
尤金妮·布林克玛(Eugenie Brinkema)的第一部作品《影响的形式》(the Forms of the Affects,2014)以泪珠开场,她的最新著作《毁灭生命的图表》(Life Destroying Diagrams)以另一个绑定在身体上的能指开始:脖子。Brinkema从脖子上批评了诸如Linda Williams(1991年)的身体流派、Noël Carroll(1990年)的恐怖美学哲学或James Twitchell(1985年)的《可怕的快乐》等学术界是如何将恐怖完全视为一种身体影响的:颤抖或皮肤上的鸡皮疙瘩Brinkema表示,“我受够了脖子”,这是她反对对身体的特权化,从而限制对恐怖的情感解读的开场白(第1页)。Brinkema对身体问题的巧妙解决方案——或者说,当情感目的论只通过身体思考时——是通过形式重新思考恐怖。因此,网格、图表、六边形、线条、圆圈或节奏被用来激活情感潜力。然而,正如作者明确指出的那样,这本书不是关于恐怖,而是关于形式的阅读影响。因此,《毁灭生命的图表》重新确立了布林克马的激进形式主义理论,该理论要求通过“无保证的阅读”来激发文本的潜力,从而“回到思维所能声称的推测基础或根源”(第21页)。《毁灭生命图》的结果是对美学理论的挑衅性和命令性干预,它可以活跃恐怖学术界以及视觉文化研究、文学研究、电影研究和大陆哲学等更大领域中已经先入为主的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: journal of visual culture is essential reading for academics, researchers and students engaged with the visual within the fields and disciplines of: · film, media and television studies · art, design, fashion and architecture history ·visual culture ·cultural studies and critical theory · gender studies and queer studies · ethnic studies and critical race studies·philosophy and aesthetics ·photography, new media and electronic imaging ·critical sociology ·history ·geography/urban studies ·comparative literature and romance languages ·the history and philosophy of science, technology and medicine
期刊最新文献
A cultural dream: Europe in the plural Crip curation and the aesthetics of the undeliverable At the crossroads: photography, ecology and heritage in Istanbul Revolutionary Enclosures (Until the Apricots) Gaza in plain sight: witnessing in solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1