The Collective Imagination and the Limitations for the Tianxia to Replace the Westphalian World Order

Q4 Social Sciences Politologija Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.15388/polit.2022.105.4
Giedrius Česnakas
{"title":"The Collective Imagination and the Limitations for the Tianxia to Replace the Westphalian World Order","authors":"Giedrius Česnakas","doi":"10.15388/polit.2022.105.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collective political imagination establishes world orders that define how political communities interact. The relative power of the West allowed the introduction of the first global world order, known as the Westphalian. However, the increasing relative power of the People’s Republic of China allows it to promote an alternative world order vision, which is the result of its political imagination. Zhao Tingyang’s re-imagined hierarchic Tianxia order is seen as a challenger to the Westphalian order. This paper analyzes whether the Tianxia order can replace the Westphalian, considering the contemporary global political environment. The discussion is based on Jeffrey Legro’s theory of collective ideas and foreign policy change, applying it to world order replacement analysis. The findings suggest that the Tianxia has significant limitations in replacing the Westphalian world order. The Westphalian order orthodoxy remains strong. The order is also adaptable, capable of including hierarchical elements. Despite the increase of the PRC’s relative power and its greater capabilities to shape norms with domestic support, continuity usually prevails, so the habit of sovereignty prevails over hierarchical order. Finally, the article argues that the Tianxia order is not resilient to the anarchic-competitive element of human nature.","PeriodicalId":35151,"journal":{"name":"Politologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/polit.2022.105.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The collective political imagination establishes world orders that define how political communities interact. The relative power of the West allowed the introduction of the first global world order, known as the Westphalian. However, the increasing relative power of the People’s Republic of China allows it to promote an alternative world order vision, which is the result of its political imagination. Zhao Tingyang’s re-imagined hierarchic Tianxia order is seen as a challenger to the Westphalian order. This paper analyzes whether the Tianxia order can replace the Westphalian, considering the contemporary global political environment. The discussion is based on Jeffrey Legro’s theory of collective ideas and foreign policy change, applying it to world order replacement analysis. The findings suggest that the Tianxia has significant limitations in replacing the Westphalian world order. The Westphalian order orthodoxy remains strong. The order is also adaptable, capable of including hierarchical elements. Despite the increase of the PRC’s relative power and its greater capabilities to shape norms with domestic support, continuity usually prevails, so the habit of sovereignty prevails over hierarchical order. Finally, the article argues that the Tianxia order is not resilient to the anarchic-competitive element of human nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体想象与天下取代威斯特伐利亚世界秩序的局限性
集体政治想象建立了定义政治共同体如何互动的世界秩序。西方的相对力量促成了第一个全球世界秩序的建立,即威斯特伐利亚秩序。然而,中华人民共和国日益增强的相对权力使其能够推动另一种世界秩序愿景,这是其政治想象力的结果。赵的天夏秩序被视为对威斯特伐利亚秩序的挑战。本文结合当代全球政治环境,分析天下秩序能否取代威斯特伐利亚秩序。本文以杰弗里·莱格罗的集体思想和外交政策变化理论为基础,将其应用于世界秩序替代分析。研究结果表明,天下在取代威斯特伐利亚世界秩序方面存在重大局限性。威斯特伐利亚秩序的正统性仍然很强。该顺序也是可调整的,能够包括层次元素。尽管中华人民共和国的相对权力有所增加,在国内支持下制定规范的能力也有所增强,但通常情况下,延续性占主导地位,因此主权的习惯凌驾于等级秩序之上。最后,文章认为天下秩序对人性中的无政府竞争因素不具有弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politologija
Politologija Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tarp sėkmės ir katastrofos: dvi perspektyvos į perėjimo procesą postkomunistinėse valstybėse Challenging Political Representation in the Era of Big Data Nuo akmens iki sėklos: objektai ir kontratminties aktyvizmas Brazilijoje antikolonijinio demonumentalizavimo sąlygomis Aukštų pareigūnų skyrimas pusiau prezidentiniame modelyje: Lietuvos atvejis* The Theoretical Model of Smart Governance in Local Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1