Comparative evaluation of setting time and sealing ability of two root end filling materials: An In vitro Study

Vidhi Kharabe, N. Thosar, P. Fulzele, Sphurti P Bane, Suruchi Gupta
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of setting time and sealing ability of two root end filling materials: An In vitro Study","authors":"Vidhi Kharabe, N. Thosar, P. Fulzele, Sphurti P Bane, Suruchi Gupta","doi":"10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Incomplete root formation caused due to trauma can lead to problems in future. Treating such open apices teeth pose a challenge. Apexification is one of the treatment options for such teeth with open apex. Thus, this in vitro study intended to assess and compare two commercially available root-end filling materials mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Angelus and Biodentine™ for their setting time and sealing ability. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study assessed the setting time and sealing ability of the two materials; MTA-Angelus and Biodentine™. For setting time evaluation, 30 rings were made and divided into two groups. The evaluation was done using Vicat apparatus. For sealing ability, sixty single rooted teeth were used and were divided into four groups (two experimental and two control). The assessment was done using the linear dye penetration method. Results: Mean setting time of Biodentine and MTA was 29.2 ± 3.84 min and 15.2 ± 2.11 min, respectively. The mean linear dye penetration in MTA group was found to be 0.808 ± 1.094 mm, 3.76 ± 1.05 mm in Biodentine group, 5.28 ± 1.73 mm and 0.05 mm in positive control group. Conclusion: MTA-Angelus demonstrated a faster setting time when compared to biodentine, while biodentine showed to have a superior sealing ability.","PeriodicalId":15592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","volume":"18 1","pages":"468 - 474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_104_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Incomplete root formation caused due to trauma can lead to problems in future. Treating such open apices teeth pose a challenge. Apexification is one of the treatment options for such teeth with open apex. Thus, this in vitro study intended to assess and compare two commercially available root-end filling materials mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Angelus and Biodentine™ for their setting time and sealing ability. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study assessed the setting time and sealing ability of the two materials; MTA-Angelus and Biodentine™. For setting time evaluation, 30 rings were made and divided into two groups. The evaluation was done using Vicat apparatus. For sealing ability, sixty single rooted teeth were used and were divided into four groups (two experimental and two control). The assessment was done using the linear dye penetration method. Results: Mean setting time of Biodentine and MTA was 29.2 ± 3.84 min and 15.2 ± 2.11 min, respectively. The mean linear dye penetration in MTA group was found to be 0.808 ± 1.094 mm, 3.76 ± 1.05 mm in Biodentine group, 5.28 ± 1.73 mm and 0.05 mm in positive control group. Conclusion: MTA-Angelus demonstrated a faster setting time when compared to biodentine, while biodentine showed to have a superior sealing ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种根尖充填材料凝固时间和密封能力的体外比较研究
目的:外伤引起的牙根不完全形成可导致今后的问题。治疗这样的开放尖牙是一个挑战。根尖成形术是根尖开牙的治疗方法之一。因此,本体外研究旨在评估和比较两种市售的三氧化矿物骨料(MTA)-Angelus和Biodentine™的固化时间和密封能力。材料与方法:体外实验评估两种材料的凝固时间和密封能力;MTA-Angelus和Biodentine™。为评价凝固时间,制作30个环,分为两组。采用维卡仪进行评价。采用60颗单根牙进行封闭,分为4组(2个实验组和2个对照组)。采用线性染料渗透法进行评价。结果:百奥汀和MTA的平均凝固时间分别为29.2±3.84 min和15.2±2.11 min。MTA组平均线性染料穿透率为0.808±1.094 mm,百奥汀组为3.76±1.05 mm,阳性对照组为5.28±1.73 mm, 0.05 mm。结论:MTA-Angelus的凝固时间比biodentine快,而biodentine的密封能力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Academic to AI-cademic: Challenges and Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing Manoeuvring distal tibial shaft fractures with Ender's nailing: Case series Effect of palliative care communication on knowledge and attitude among caregivers of cancer patients The effect of toothbrushing duration on plaque removal: A randomized crossover trial Amelioration of pathological tooth migration by surgical periodontal therapy alone: A stupendous clinical case report with two year follow up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1