Between real and virtual, map and terrain: ScanLab Projects, Post-lenticular Landscapes

IF 0.1 0 ART Philosophy of Photography Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1386/pop_00020_1
Peter F. Ainsworth
{"title":"Between real and virtual, map and terrain: ScanLab Projects, Post-lenticular Landscapes","authors":"Peter F. Ainsworth","doi":"10.1386/pop_00020_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"London-based company ScanLab Projects is a multi-disciplinary commercial collaboration between architect, artist, coders and designers who utilize technologies surrounding 3D laser scanning in their practice. Inherent in the manner their projects are pitched is through reference to\n the photographic as technological process. Central to their engagement with the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scanning apparatus is a consideration of the relationality between virtual or digital object and what could be determined as extrinsic or ‘real’ terrain. In Post-lenticular\n Landscapes, 2017, ScanLab created a series of LiDAR scans of Yosemite National Park. The landscape, presented as a stereoscopic film work where the spectator flies through an ephemeral black and white point cloud, is contextualized relationally to a certain photo-historical context and\n lineage: As Yosemite is synonymous with the advent of photographic process through the work of Muybridge, Watkins, Woods and Adams, the work revisits an archetypal image of the American sublime. In this text, I unpack ScanLab’s usage and conceptualization of LiDAR scans referentially\n to an understanding of the photographic. By considering how ScanLab frames our understanding of the project through the technological apparatus, the text attempts to problematize the scans by reading them through a particular art historic heritage. In this context, I posit alternate ways of\n reading the work, specifically through reference to the image of Yosemite that has proliferated across the desktops of Apple computers since 2014. Furthermore, through a reading of metonymy in the writing of Eelco Runia, the eerie as understood by Mark Fisher and in relation\n to Lev Manovich’s description of photorealism, I propose that the future of the mediation and understandings of machinic vision are to be thought with a reconsidered notion of the photographic.","PeriodicalId":40690,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Photography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Photography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00020_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

London-based company ScanLab Projects is a multi-disciplinary commercial collaboration between architect, artist, coders and designers who utilize technologies surrounding 3D laser scanning in their practice. Inherent in the manner their projects are pitched is through reference to the photographic as technological process. Central to their engagement with the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scanning apparatus is a consideration of the relationality between virtual or digital object and what could be determined as extrinsic or ‘real’ terrain. In Post-lenticular Landscapes, 2017, ScanLab created a series of LiDAR scans of Yosemite National Park. The landscape, presented as a stereoscopic film work where the spectator flies through an ephemeral black and white point cloud, is contextualized relationally to a certain photo-historical context and lineage: As Yosemite is synonymous with the advent of photographic process through the work of Muybridge, Watkins, Woods and Adams, the work revisits an archetypal image of the American sublime. In this text, I unpack ScanLab’s usage and conceptualization of LiDAR scans referentially to an understanding of the photographic. By considering how ScanLab frames our understanding of the project through the technological apparatus, the text attempts to problematize the scans by reading them through a particular art historic heritage. In this context, I posit alternate ways of reading the work, specifically through reference to the image of Yosemite that has proliferated across the desktops of Apple computers since 2014. Furthermore, through a reading of metonymy in the writing of Eelco Runia, the eerie as understood by Mark Fisher and in relation to Lev Manovich’s description of photorealism, I propose that the future of the mediation and understandings of machinic vision are to be thought with a reconsidered notion of the photographic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实和虚拟之间,地图和地形:ScanLab项目,后透镜景观
总部位于伦敦的ScanLab Projects公司是一家多学科的商业合作公司,由建筑师、艺术家、编码员和设计师组成,他们在实践中利用3D激光扫描技术。他们项目的固有方式是通过参考摄影作为技术过程。他们与光探测和测距(LiDAR)扫描设备合作的核心是考虑虚拟或数字对象与可确定为外部或“真实”地形之间的关系。在2017年的《后透镜景观》中,ScanLab对约塞米蒂国家公园进行了一系列激光雷达扫描。这幅风景以立体电影作品的形式呈现,观众在短暂的黑白点云中飞翔,与特定的摄影历史背景和血统相关联:由于约塞米蒂是迈布里奇、沃特金斯、伍兹和亚当斯作品中摄影过程出现的代名词,该作品重新审视了美国崇高的原型形象。在本文中,我打开ScanLab的使用和概念的激光雷达扫描参考的摄影的理解。通过考虑ScanLab如何通过技术设备构建我们对项目的理解,文本试图通过特定的艺术历史遗产来解读扫描。在这种背景下,我假设了其他阅读作品的方式,特别是通过参考自2014年以来在苹果电脑桌面上激增的约塞米蒂的图像。此外,通过阅读Eelco Runia作品中的转喻,Mark Fisher所理解的怪异,以及Lev Manovich对摄影现实主义的描述,我提出,未来对机器视觉的调解和理解应该以重新考虑摄影的概念来思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘A knife without a blade, for which a handle is missing’: On the pleasure of photographic violence ‘Negative’ Toward the Critique of Violence: A Critical Edition, Walter Benjamin, Peter Fenves (ed.) and Julia Ng (ed.) (2021) Shot/countershot: Essaying images of war and violence in the work of Harun Farocki, Hito Steyerl and Rabih Mroué Loss of vision: On emotional affects caused by the representation of violence in Russia’s war against Ukraine and beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1