Quadratic effect of bank size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior: Evidence from the Central Europe

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Financial Engineering Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1142/s2424786323500196
Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, Musfikur Rahman
{"title":"Quadratic effect of bank size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior: Evidence from the Central Europe","authors":"Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, Musfikur Rahman","doi":"10.1142/s2424786323500196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper primarily examines the quadratic effect of banks’ size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior by using simultaneous equation approach. This paper primarily examines the quadratic effect of banks’ size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior by using simultaneous equation approach. To carry out the objective, this study has been built on the two-stage least squares (2SLS) method for a dynamic unstructured panel data of 85 banks from the Central European banks for the period 2012–2017. There is a positive and significant relation between regulatory capital and risk. Also, higher risk-taking behavior causes banks to sacrifice their stability. This study also finds that there is a negative correlation between bank size and capital, indicating that larger the bank size lower tendency to keep capital more. In similar way, there is also a negative association between bank size and risk taking, indicating that lower tendency of taking risk by large banks and vice-versa. Finally, this paper can be used as a medium of information for the stakeholders of banks and others financial institutions of the country. There is a dearth of literature which was built on the quadratic effect of bank size regarding recent financial regulation and risk.","PeriodicalId":54088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786323500196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper primarily examines the quadratic effect of banks’ size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior by using simultaneous equation approach. This paper primarily examines the quadratic effect of banks’ size on capital regulation and risk-taking behavior by using simultaneous equation approach. To carry out the objective, this study has been built on the two-stage least squares (2SLS) method for a dynamic unstructured panel data of 85 banks from the Central European banks for the period 2012–2017. There is a positive and significant relation between regulatory capital and risk. Also, higher risk-taking behavior causes banks to sacrifice their stability. This study also finds that there is a negative correlation between bank size and capital, indicating that larger the bank size lower tendency to keep capital more. In similar way, there is also a negative association between bank size and risk taking, indicating that lower tendency of taking risk by large banks and vice-versa. Finally, this paper can be used as a medium of information for the stakeholders of banks and others financial institutions of the country. There is a dearth of literature which was built on the quadratic effect of bank size regarding recent financial regulation and risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行规模对资本监管和风险承担行为的二次效应:来自中欧的证据
本文主要采用联立方程方法考察银行规模对资本监管和风险承担行为的二次效应。本文主要采用联立方程方法考察银行规模对资本监管和风险承担行为的二次效应。为了实现这一目标,本研究基于两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)方法,对2012-2017年期间中欧85家银行的动态非结构化面板数据进行了分析。监管资本与风险之间存在显著正相关关系。此外,更高的冒险行为会导致银行牺牲自身的稳定性。本研究还发现,银行规模与资本之间存在负相关关系,表明银行规模越大,越倾向于保留资本。同样,银行规模与风险承担之间也存在负相关关系,表明大银行承担风险的倾向较低,反之亦然。最后,本文可以作为银行和国家其他金融机构的利益相关者的信息媒介。缺乏建立在银行规模对近期金融监管和风险的二次效应上的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Optimal investment–consumption–insurance strategy with inflation risk and stochastic income in an Itô–Lévy setting Asymmetric link between energy market and crypto market The binomial option pricing model: The trouble with dividends Stochastic method of dynamic hedging applied to the high liquid asset markets Consumer preferences on quality of supermarket services in organized retailing: Structural equation modeling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1