Agent-based modelling as a method for prediction in complex social systems

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Social Research Methodology Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1080/13645579.2023.2152007
C. Elsenbroich, J. Gareth Polhill
{"title":"Agent-based modelling as a method for prediction in complex social systems","authors":"C. Elsenbroich, J. Gareth Polhill","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2023.2152007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Agent-based models (ABMs) have their origins in considerations of complexity science stipulating that many phenomena can be ‘grown from the bottom up’. Explicitly, this was expressed in Epstein & Axtell’s (1996) Growing Artificial Societies as the change from ‘Can you explain it?’ to ‘Can you grow it?’. In 2008, Epstein published an article entitled Why Model? in which he discussed his exasperation with people asking for predictions from ABM, pointing out that many other purposes to which it might be applied are more worthy of consideration than prediction, including explanation, improving data collection, testing theories and suggesting analogies. Fourteen years later, the debate about the predictive powers of ABM is still unresolved. This special issue presents the range of positions on ABM and prediction, tackling methodological, epistemological and pragmatic issues.","PeriodicalId":14272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","volume":"26 1","pages":"133 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2152007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Agent-based models (ABMs) have their origins in considerations of complexity science stipulating that many phenomena can be ‘grown from the bottom up’. Explicitly, this was expressed in Epstein & Axtell’s (1996) Growing Artificial Societies as the change from ‘Can you explain it?’ to ‘Can you grow it?’. In 2008, Epstein published an article entitled Why Model? in which he discussed his exasperation with people asking for predictions from ABM, pointing out that many other purposes to which it might be applied are more worthy of consideration than prediction, including explanation, improving data collection, testing theories and suggesting analogies. Fourteen years later, the debate about the predictive powers of ABM is still unresolved. This special issue presents the range of positions on ABM and prediction, tackling methodological, epistemological and pragmatic issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Agent的建模方法在复杂社会系统中的预测
基于主体的模型(ABMs)起源于复杂性科学的考虑,它规定许多现象可以“自下而上地生长”。Epstein & Axtell(1996)的《成长中的人工社会》(Growing Artificial Societies)明确表达了这一点,从“你能解释一下吗?”到“你能种吗?”2008年,爱泼斯坦发表了一篇题为《为什么是模型?》在这篇文章中,他谈到了他对那些要求从ABM中做出预测的人的愤怒,并指出,与预测相比,ABM可能应用于许多其他更值得考虑的目的,包括解释、改进数据收集、检验理论和提出类比。14年过去了,关于ABM预测能力的争论仍未得到解决。本期特刊介绍了对ABM和预测的一系列立场,解决了方法论、认识论和实用主义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
International Journal of Social Research Methodology SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Linking survey and Facebook data: mechanisms of consent and linkage Tate Liverpool’s Democracies: curatorial methodologies for exploring democracy An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys A brief reply to David Byrne Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1