Collaboration between Australian peak bodies and governments in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: New ways of interacting

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Australian Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.1002/ajs4.260
Wendy L. Foote, Amy Conley Wright, Jennifer Mason, Tracy McEwan
{"title":"Collaboration between Australian peak bodies and governments in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: New ways of interacting","authors":"Wendy L. Foote,&nbsp;Amy Conley Wright,&nbsp;Jennifer Mason,&nbsp;Tracy McEwan","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peak bodies (“peaks”) are funded by Australian governments to fulfil a multifaceted role, including presenting a collective voice to government on behalf of their nongovernmental service provider members and the vulnerable client populations they serve. However, the relationship between peaks and governments has been fraught, with governments imposing contractual conditions in exchange for funding, thereby constraining advocacy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the nongovernmental sector provided vital services, including care and support for children and families, and dispensed emergency funding through their service networks. This research investigates engagement between peak bodies and governments during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020–2021. Nineteen CEOs and senior executives were interviewed from 16 peak bodies. Additionally, 27 surveys were completed by peak and nongovernmental sector representatives. Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo and thematically analysed. Four types of interactions between government and peak bodies were identified: collective leadership; partnership; advocacy to influence; and advocacy designed for public pressure. These four types of interactions formed a public advocacy continuum. In some Australian jurisdictions, the study showed that collective and partnership mechanisms between peaks and government were strengthened or revived, yet sustained work will be needed to entrench these positive developments in a postcrisis environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"58 4","pages":"838-854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peak bodies (“peaks”) are funded by Australian governments to fulfil a multifaceted role, including presenting a collective voice to government on behalf of their nongovernmental service provider members and the vulnerable client populations they serve. However, the relationship between peaks and governments has been fraught, with governments imposing contractual conditions in exchange for funding, thereby constraining advocacy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the nongovernmental sector provided vital services, including care and support for children and families, and dispensed emergency funding through their service networks. This research investigates engagement between peak bodies and governments during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020–2021. Nineteen CEOs and senior executives were interviewed from 16 peak bodies. Additionally, 27 surveys were completed by peak and nongovernmental sector representatives. Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo and thematically analysed. Four types of interactions between government and peak bodies were identified: collective leadership; partnership; advocacy to influence; and advocacy designed for public pressure. These four types of interactions formed a public advocacy continuum. In some Australian jurisdictions, the study showed that collective and partnership mechanisms between peaks and government were strengthened or revived, yet sustained work will be needed to entrench these positive developments in a postcrisis environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID - 19大流行背景下,澳大利亚高峰机构与政府之间的合作:新的互动方式
高峰机构(“高峰”)由澳大利亚政府资助,以履行多方面的角色,包括代表非政府服务提供者成员和他们所服务的弱势客户群体向政府发出集体声音。然而,山峰和政府之间的关系一直令人担忧,政府强加合同条件以换取资金,从而限制了宣传。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,非政府部门提供了至关重要的服务,包括对儿童和家庭的护理和支持,并通过其服务网络发放应急资金。本研究调查了2020-2021年COVID-19大流行期间高峰机构与政府之间的互动。来自16个高峰机构的19位首席执行官和高管接受了采访。此外,高峰和非政府部门代表还完成了27项调查。访谈记录使用NVivo编码并进行主题分析。确定了政府与高峰机构之间的四种互动类型:集体领导;伙伴关系;倡导影响;以及为公众压力而设计的宣传。这四种互动形成了一个公共倡导的连续体。研究表明,在澳大利亚的一些司法管辖区,山峰和政府之间的集体和伙伴关系机制得到了加强或恢复,但在危机后的环境中,要巩固这些积极的发展,还需要持续的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Patterns of Multisystem Involvement in Adolescence: Implications for Health, Education and Social Services in the Northern Territory of Australia Issue Information AJSI Transitions From Out-Of-Home Care Special Issue Editorial by Philip Mendes, Lynne McPherson, Jemma Venables, Steven Roche and Jenna Bollinger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1