Has the SEC ever been Willing to Accept Qualified Audit Opinions for a GAAP Departure?

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Historians Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.2308/aahj-2021-012
J. D. Keyser
{"title":"Has the SEC ever been Willing to Accept Qualified Audit Opinions for a GAAP Departure?","authors":"J. D. Keyser","doi":"10.2308/aahj-2021-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auditing standards promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) outline four alternatives for auditors’ reports: unqualified, qualified, adverse, and disclaimer.  However, at the present time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) generally accepts only one of these alternatives: an unqualified opinion.  Prior to the elimination of “subject to” qualified opinions in 1988, the SEC allowed such opinions in the case of material uncertainties.  However, the SEC has not, as a general rule, accepted opinions qualified for departures from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) since it issued Accounting Series Release (ASR) No. 4 on April 25, 1938.  This paper describes an instance where the SEC agreed to accept opinions qualified for a departure from compliance with GAAP.","PeriodicalId":43735,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Historians Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Historians Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/aahj-2021-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Auditing standards promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) outline four alternatives for auditors’ reports: unqualified, qualified, adverse, and disclaimer.  However, at the present time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) generally accepts only one of these alternatives: an unqualified opinion.  Prior to the elimination of “subject to” qualified opinions in 1988, the SEC allowed such opinions in the case of material uncertainties.  However, the SEC has not, as a general rule, accepted opinions qualified for departures from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) since it issued Accounting Series Release (ASR) No. 4 on April 25, 1938.  This paper describes an instance where the SEC agreed to accept opinions qualified for a departure from compliance with GAAP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国证券交易委员会是否曾经愿意接受针对GAAP背离的合格审计意见?
上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)颁布的审计准则概述了审计师报告的四种替代方案:无保留、有保留、不利和免责声明。然而,目前,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)通常只接受其中一种选择:无保留意见。在1988年取消“服从”限定意见之前,美国证券交易委员会允许在存在重大不确定性的情况下发表此类意见。然而,自1938年4月25日发布第4号会计系列公告(ASR)以来,美国证券交易委员会通常没有接受有资格偏离公认会计原则(GAAP)的意见。本文描述了一个美国证券交易会同意接受有资格背离公认会计原则的意见的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Historians Journal
Accounting Historians Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Accounting Historians Journal is an international journal that addresses the development of accounting thought and practice. AHJ embraces all subject matter related to accounting history, including but not limited to research that provides historical perspective on contemporary issues.
期刊最新文献
A History of the Academy of Accounting Historians: 2014–2023 The Impact of World War II on Accounting and Finance at the Alger-Sullivan Lumber Company in Century, Florida The First PCAOB Director of Registration and Inspections George Henry Diacont Peculiarities of Accounting Practices in Francesco Datini’s Partnership in Pisa Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1