{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja TCP Vegas dan TCP New Reno Menggunakan Antrian Drop Tail","authors":"Dony Fahrudy, Bambang Sugiantoro","doi":"10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.","PeriodicalId":34216,"journal":{"name":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISKA Jurnal Informatika Sunan Kalijaga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/jiska.2022.7.1.20-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
TCP was developed to deal with problems that often occur in the network, such as congestion problems. Congestion can occur when the number of packets transmitted in the network approaches the network capacity which can cause network problems. This can be overcome by implementing TCP and queue management. In this research, we will test the performance of TCP Newreno and TCP Vegas using NS-2 in the Drop Tail queue. The performance parameters used are throughput, packet drop, and congestion window with additional buffer capacity. The test results for the congestion window and packet drop parameters, TCP Vegas has better performance when the buffer gets bigger when congestion occurs with the congestion window smaller than TCP New Reno and the average packet drop is 18.33 packets compared to TCP New Reno with an average of 18.33 packets. average 41.67 packets. For throughput parameters, TCP New Reno has better performance with an average of 6.77253 Mbps than TCP Vegas with an average of 4.29693 Mbps. From testing and analysis that TCP Vegas has better performance than TCP New Reno when using Drop Tail queues.
TCP的开发是为了解决网络中经常出现的问题,例如拥塞问题。当网络中传输的数据包数量接近网络容量时,可能会发生拥塞,这可能会导致网络问题。这可以通过实现TCP和队列管理来克服。在本研究中,我们将在Drop-Tail队列中使用NS-2测试TCP Newreno和TCP Vegas的性能。使用的性能参数是吞吐量、数据包丢弃和具有额外缓冲容量的拥塞窗口。对拥塞窗口和丢包参数的测试结果表明,当拥塞窗口小于TCP New Reno时,当缓冲区变大时,TCP Vegas具有更好的性能,与平均18.33包的TCP New Reno相比,平均丢包为18.33包。平均41.67个数据包。在吞吐量参数方面,TCP New Reno的平均性能为6.77253 Mbps,比TCP Vegas的平均性能4.29693 Mbps要好。通过测试和分析,TCP Vegas在使用Drop Tail队列时比TCP New Reno具有更好的性能。