The Jewish Pig Prohibition from Leviticus to the Maccabees

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Biblical Literature Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.15699/jbl.1422.2023.3
Julia Rhyder
{"title":"The Jewish Pig Prohibition from Leviticus to the Maccabees","authors":"Julia Rhyder","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1422.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Pig avoidance is among the most famous and well studied of the customs described in the Hebrew Bible. Commonly the ban on consuming pork has been considered evidence of the importance of dietary prohibitions in establishing boundaries between Israel and neighboring groups. I argue, however, that differentiation from other ethnicities by means of diet was not the only function that the pig prohibition served in ancient Israel. In fact, the relevant biblical texts are as much, if not more, concerned with employing the pig prohibition as a device by which cultic norms as well as dietary customs within the Israelite community were standardized. With the accounts of the Maccabean rebellion in the second century BCE, the pig assumes a greater significance in identity formation, but even in these traditions, the relationship between pig avoidance and ethnic boundaries is more complex than is often assumed. Detailed analysis of the references to the pig in Lev 11, Deut 14, Isa 56–66, and 1 and 2 Maccabees, along with the study of archaeological evidence and comparative materials from the ancient Near East and ancient Mediterranean more broadly, reveals the multiplicity of factors that shaped the emergence of pig avoidance as a central custom in ancient Judaism.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"142 1","pages":"221 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1422.2023.3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Pig avoidance is among the most famous and well studied of the customs described in the Hebrew Bible. Commonly the ban on consuming pork has been considered evidence of the importance of dietary prohibitions in establishing boundaries between Israel and neighboring groups. I argue, however, that differentiation from other ethnicities by means of diet was not the only function that the pig prohibition served in ancient Israel. In fact, the relevant biblical texts are as much, if not more, concerned with employing the pig prohibition as a device by which cultic norms as well as dietary customs within the Israelite community were standardized. With the accounts of the Maccabean rebellion in the second century BCE, the pig assumes a greater significance in identity formation, but even in these traditions, the relationship between pig avoidance and ethnic boundaries is more complex than is often assumed. Detailed analysis of the references to the pig in Lev 11, Deut 14, Isa 56–66, and 1 and 2 Maccabees, along with the study of archaeological evidence and comparative materials from the ancient Near East and ancient Mediterranean more broadly, reveals the multiplicity of factors that shaped the emergence of pig avoidance as a central custom in ancient Judaism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从利未记到马加比,犹太人对猪的禁令
摘要:避猪是希伯来圣经中最著名、研究最深入的习俗之一。通常,禁止食用猪肉被认为是饮食禁忌在建立以色列和邻近群体之间边界方面的重要性的证据。然而,我认为,在古代以色列,通过饮食来区分其他种族并不是禁止猪的唯一功能。事实上,相关的圣经文本,即使不是更多,也同样关注将猪禁令作为一种手段,通过这种手段,以色列社区的宗教规范和饮食习俗得以标准化。在公元前2世纪的马加比叛乱中,猪在身份形成中具有更大的意义,但即使在这些传统中,猪与种族界限之间的关系也比通常认为的要复杂得多。对利未记11章、申命记14章、以赛亚书56-66章和马加比书1章和2章中提到猪的详细分析,以及对古近东和古地中海更广泛的考古证据和比较材料的研究,揭示了多种因素,这些因素形成了古代犹太教中不吃猪的中心习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Getting Rigor Right: A Framework for Methodological Choice in Adaptive Monitoring and Evaluation. Love, Marriage, and a Delayed Harvest: Isaiah 61 as the Reversal of the Song of the Vineyard (5:1–7) Remembering God’s Beloved Son: Jeremiah 38:20 LXX and Mark 1:11 Exotica and the Ethiopian of Acts 8:26–40: Toward a Different Fabula John 21:15–19 as a Prophetic Succession: A Reading in Light of 2 Kings 2:1–18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1