Statistical Package for Social Sciences Acceptance in Quantitative Research: From the Technology Acceptance Model’s Perspective

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY FWU Journal of Social Sciences Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/3
{"title":"Statistical Package for Social Sciences Acceptance in Quantitative Research: From the Technology Acceptance Model’s Perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, education, medicine, business, and all other fields rely heavily on\ncomputers. This reliance is increased much when both professionals and\nacademic level students have to conduct research projects. This reliance is indicated by the availability and utility of the software, which is an integral part of computer technology. Hence, by keeping in view the importance of SPSS in research, we scrutinized the significant factors behind Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) adoption and acceptance. We executed an experimental approach and gathered data from n= 300 young researchers studying in the n= 4 public sector universities in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. By adopting the\nprimary variables from the Technology Acceptance Model, we proposed and a study model and examined it by using Smart-PLS. Findings showed that perceived ease of use and usefulness are significantly associated with Quantitative Research. Here, perceived ease of use and usefulness also indicated their interrelationship to validate the technology acceptance further. As a result, we also found a significant relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness, and SPSS technology acceptance. In simple terms, ease of use and valuable outcomes are the primary reasons behind SPSS acceptance among Pakistani students. Thus, we conclude that today, when technology has facilitated all the fields of life, research and development is another major field that is availing enormous advantages from the technology acceptance, integration, and execution. We recommend that SPSS usage should be encouraged for research purposes. Educational institutions should introduce new courses regarding SPSS learning and use them to further increase quantitative research aptitude among students.","PeriodicalId":43392,"journal":{"name":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/winter-2021/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Today, education, medicine, business, and all other fields rely heavily on computers. This reliance is increased much when both professionals and academic level students have to conduct research projects. This reliance is indicated by the availability and utility of the software, which is an integral part of computer technology. Hence, by keeping in view the importance of SPSS in research, we scrutinized the significant factors behind Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) adoption and acceptance. We executed an experimental approach and gathered data from n= 300 young researchers studying in the n= 4 public sector universities in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. By adopting the primary variables from the Technology Acceptance Model, we proposed and a study model and examined it by using Smart-PLS. Findings showed that perceived ease of use and usefulness are significantly associated with Quantitative Research. Here, perceived ease of use and usefulness also indicated their interrelationship to validate the technology acceptance further. As a result, we also found a significant relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness, and SPSS technology acceptance. In simple terms, ease of use and valuable outcomes are the primary reasons behind SPSS acceptance among Pakistani students. Thus, we conclude that today, when technology has facilitated all the fields of life, research and development is another major field that is availing enormous advantages from the technology acceptance, integration, and execution. We recommend that SPSS usage should be encouraged for research purposes. Educational institutions should introduce new courses regarding SPSS learning and use them to further increase quantitative research aptitude among students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量研究中社会科学接受度的统计包:基于技术接受模型的视角
今天,教育、医药、商业和所有其他领域都严重依赖计算机。当专业人士和学术水平的学生都必须进行研究项目时,这种依赖会增加很多。这种依赖体现在软件的可用性和实用性上,软件是计算机技术的一个组成部分。因此,考虑到SPSS在研究中的重要性,我们仔细审查了社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)采用和接受背后的重要因素。我们采用了一种实验方法,从巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡的4所公立大学的n= 300名年轻研究人员那里收集数据。采用技术接受模型中的主要变量,提出了一个研究模型,并使用Smart-PLS对其进行了检验。研究结果表明,感知易用性和有用性与定量研究显著相关。在这里,感知到的易用性和实用性也表明了它们之间的相互关系,从而进一步验证了技术的接受程度。因此,我们还发现感知有用性、感知有用性和SPSS技术接受度之间存在显著的关系。简单来说,易用性和有价值的结果是巴基斯坦学生接受SPSS的主要原因。因此,我们得出结论,今天,当技术促进了生活的各个领域时,研究和开发是另一个主要领域,从技术的接受、集成和执行中获得了巨大的优势。我们建议应鼓励使用SPSS用于研究目的。教育机构应该开设新的SPSS学习课程,并利用这些课程进一步提高学生的定量研究能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
FWU Journal of Social Sciences
FWU Journal of Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
57.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Motivational Factors in Chinese Language Learning: A Study of Foreign Language Learners The Effect of Information Sources on Trust and Investment: Evidence from Economic Experimentation Situationally Appropriate Leadership Styles and Team Performance: Is Trust Really Important Nexus Between Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Corporate Governance and Bank Performance During Times of Crisis Unraveling the Dimensions of Child Sexual Abuse Portrayal by Web Based Media Channels: Pakistani News Framers’ Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1