Sustainable Utopias: The Art and Politics of Hope in Germany by Jennifer Allen (review)

Pub Date : 2022-07-23 DOI:10.1093/jsh/shac039
Jake P. Smith
{"title":"Sustainable Utopias: The Art and Politics of Hope in Germany by Jennifer Allen (review)","authors":"Jake P. Smith","doi":"10.1093/jsh/shac039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rather than interpreting the 1980s in the Federal Republic of Germany as a time of fear, neoliberal retrenchment, resurgent nationalism, collapsing leftist futures, or no-future nihilism, Jennifer Allen encourages us to view these years as a period of democratic awakenings and new utopian imaginaries, an era that witnessed “a reconceptualization of the idea of utopia itself” (28). No longer was utopia singular, totalizing, or abstracted from the present; rather, over the course of the 1980s, it became something towards which one could work, a set of sustainable, everyday strategies for building a better world. In making the case for this transformation and renaissance of utopian thought, Allen focuses on three different groups: site-specific performance artists, amateur historians associated with the Berlin History Workshop, and the political activists of the nascent Green Party, all of whom engaged in practices that democratized, decentralized, and normalized utopian practices, thus making utopia sustainable. Over the course of six chapters, Allen traces how these different groups imagined and actualized their sustainable utopian visions. She begins with an analysis of experimental artists such as Joseph Beuys and Gunter Demnig, who designed projects intended to actively intervene in and transform public space. With ventures such as Beuys’s “7000 Oaks,” in which thousands of oak trees were planted throughout the city of Kassel, these artists sought to decentralize and democratize the production of art and, in so doing, to encourage citizens to participate in the critical reconstitution of their everyday environments. The historians associated with the Berlin History Workshop sought to initiate similar changes in how people engaged with the past. Instead of simply producing written studies that challenged dominant and exclusionary interpretations of history, Workshop participants designed exhibits that allowed citizens to encounter the past in their everyday lives. For example, they organized walking tours that highlighted local resistance to Nazism, they worked to change street names, and they created the “Mobile Museum,” a bus that took historical exhibits (such as the T-4 exhibit on the Nazi euthanasia program) to neighborhoods throughout the city. By changing how people interacted with traces of the past in their everyday environments, members of the Workshop believed they could cultivate critical counter publics that would actively work towards creating utopian futures. Allen’s last example comes from the activists of the German Green Party, which emerged in the early 1980s as an","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rather than interpreting the 1980s in the Federal Republic of Germany as a time of fear, neoliberal retrenchment, resurgent nationalism, collapsing leftist futures, or no-future nihilism, Jennifer Allen encourages us to view these years as a period of democratic awakenings and new utopian imaginaries, an era that witnessed “a reconceptualization of the idea of utopia itself” (28). No longer was utopia singular, totalizing, or abstracted from the present; rather, over the course of the 1980s, it became something towards which one could work, a set of sustainable, everyday strategies for building a better world. In making the case for this transformation and renaissance of utopian thought, Allen focuses on three different groups: site-specific performance artists, amateur historians associated with the Berlin History Workshop, and the political activists of the nascent Green Party, all of whom engaged in practices that democratized, decentralized, and normalized utopian practices, thus making utopia sustainable. Over the course of six chapters, Allen traces how these different groups imagined and actualized their sustainable utopian visions. She begins with an analysis of experimental artists such as Joseph Beuys and Gunter Demnig, who designed projects intended to actively intervene in and transform public space. With ventures such as Beuys’s “7000 Oaks,” in which thousands of oak trees were planted throughout the city of Kassel, these artists sought to decentralize and democratize the production of art and, in so doing, to encourage citizens to participate in the critical reconstitution of their everyday environments. The historians associated with the Berlin History Workshop sought to initiate similar changes in how people engaged with the past. Instead of simply producing written studies that challenged dominant and exclusionary interpretations of history, Workshop participants designed exhibits that allowed citizens to encounter the past in their everyday lives. For example, they organized walking tours that highlighted local resistance to Nazism, they worked to change street names, and they created the “Mobile Museum,” a bus that took historical exhibits (such as the T-4 exhibit on the Nazi euthanasia program) to neighborhoods throughout the city. By changing how people interacted with traces of the past in their everyday environments, members of the Workshop believed they could cultivate critical counter publics that would actively work towards creating utopian futures. Allen’s last example comes from the activists of the German Green Party, which emerged in the early 1980s as an
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
《可持续乌托邦:德国希望的艺术与政治》詹妮弗·艾伦著(书评)
与其将德意志联邦共和国的20世纪80年代解释为恐惧、新自由主义紧缩、民族主义复兴、左翼未来崩溃或无未来虚无主义的时代,詹妮弗·艾伦鼓励我们将这些年视为民主觉醒和新乌托邦想象的时期,一个见证“乌托邦概念本身重新概念化”的时代(28)。乌托邦不再是单一的、总体化的,也不再是从现在抽象出来的;相反,在20世纪80年代的过程中,它变成了一种人们可以为之努力的东西,一套可持续的、建设一个更美好世界的日常策略。在阐释乌托邦思想的转型和复兴时,艾伦关注了三个不同的群体:特定地点的行为艺术家、与柏林历史工作坊相关的业余历史学家,以及新生的绿党的政治活动家,他们都参与了使乌托邦实践民主化、去中心化和正常化的实践,从而使乌托邦可持续发展。在六章的课程中,艾伦追溯了这些不同的群体是如何想象和实现他们的可持续乌托邦愿景的。她首先分析了Joseph Beuys和Gunter Demnig等实验艺术家,他们设计的项目旨在积极干预和改造公共空间。通过博伊斯的“7000棵橡树”(7000 Oaks)等项目,这些艺术家在卡塞尔市种植了数千棵橡树,试图将艺术生产分散和民主化,并以此鼓励公民参与对日常环境的关键重建。与柏林历史研讨会有关的历史学家们试图在人们与过去的交往方式上发起类似的变化。工作坊的参与者并没有简单地进行书面研究,挑战对历史的主流和排他的解释,而是设计了展览,让市民在日常生活中接触到过去。例如,他们组织徒步旅行,突出当地对纳粹主义的抵抗,他们努力改变街道名称,他们创建了“移动博物馆”,一辆公共汽车,将历史展品(如关于纳粹安乐死计划的T-4展览)带到城市的各个社区。通过改变人们在日常环境中与过去的痕迹互动的方式,工作坊的成员相信他们可以培养出批判性的反公众,他们将积极地为创造乌托邦的未来而努力。艾伦的最后一个例子来自德国绿党的激进分子,该党在20世纪80年代初作为一个政党出现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1