The Meaning Sextet: A Systematic Literature Review and Further Validation of a Universal Typology of Meaning in Life

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Constructivist Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.1080/10720537.2022.2068709
J. Vos
{"title":"The Meaning Sextet: A Systematic Literature Review and Further Validation of a Universal Typology of Meaning in Life","authors":"J. Vos","doi":"10.1080/10720537.2022.2068709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many researchers have asked what individuals experience as meaningful, valuable, purposeful, or important in life. However, there seems little consensus about a world-wide typology of meaning. This project aimed to identify a comprehensive universal typology of meaning in life in the empirical literature, and to find additional support for this typology. Study 1 included a systematic literature review on all studies on meaning in life, to identify types and sub-types of meaning via thematic analysis. Study 2 conceptually compared these findings with other published meaning typologies. Study 3 operationalized this typology in the “Meaning Sextet Questionnaire” (MSQ). The MSQ was developed in a sequential mixed-methods study design, consisting of the sub-studies of Item-development, Three-Step-Test-Interview, an informal feasibility study and a formal survey. The literature review identified 6 types and 29 sub-types of meaning in 107 studies in 45.710 participants, which integrated and extended other published typologies: materialistic types of meaning (material conditions, professional-educational success), hedonistic types (hedonistic/embodied experiences), self-oriented types (resilience, self-efficacy, self-acceptance, autonomy, creative self-expression, self-care), social types (social connections, belonging, conformism, altruism, and children), larger types (purposes, personal growth, temporality, justice/ethics, and spirituality/religion), existential-philosophical types (being-alive, unique, free, grateful, and responsible). The MSQ confirmed the universality of this meaning sextet in 1281 participants in 49 countries, with factor-structure and correlations as expected with other questionnaires. Materialistic, hedonistic, and self-oriented meanings correlate with low psychological well-being, and social and larger meanings with large psychological well-being. In sum, the meaning sextet seems to be a comprehensive valid typology of meaning in life which may be used in psychological therapies, counseling, coaching and education.","PeriodicalId":46674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Constructivist Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"204 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Constructivist Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2022.2068709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Many researchers have asked what individuals experience as meaningful, valuable, purposeful, or important in life. However, there seems little consensus about a world-wide typology of meaning. This project aimed to identify a comprehensive universal typology of meaning in life in the empirical literature, and to find additional support for this typology. Study 1 included a systematic literature review on all studies on meaning in life, to identify types and sub-types of meaning via thematic analysis. Study 2 conceptually compared these findings with other published meaning typologies. Study 3 operationalized this typology in the “Meaning Sextet Questionnaire” (MSQ). The MSQ was developed in a sequential mixed-methods study design, consisting of the sub-studies of Item-development, Three-Step-Test-Interview, an informal feasibility study and a formal survey. The literature review identified 6 types and 29 sub-types of meaning in 107 studies in 45.710 participants, which integrated and extended other published typologies: materialistic types of meaning (material conditions, professional-educational success), hedonistic types (hedonistic/embodied experiences), self-oriented types (resilience, self-efficacy, self-acceptance, autonomy, creative self-expression, self-care), social types (social connections, belonging, conformism, altruism, and children), larger types (purposes, personal growth, temporality, justice/ethics, and spirituality/religion), existential-philosophical types (being-alive, unique, free, grateful, and responsible). The MSQ confirmed the universality of this meaning sextet in 1281 participants in 49 countries, with factor-structure and correlations as expected with other questionnaires. Materialistic, hedonistic, and self-oriented meanings correlate with low psychological well-being, and social and larger meanings with large psychological well-being. In sum, the meaning sextet seems to be a comprehensive valid typology of meaning in life which may be used in psychological therapies, counseling, coaching and education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意义六重奏:系统的文献回顾和对生活意义的普遍类型学的进一步验证
许多研究人员都在问,人们在生活中经历过什么是有意义的、有价值的、有目的的或重要的。然而,关于意义的世界范围的类型学似乎没有达成共识。该项目旨在确定经验文献中生活意义的全面普遍类型,并为这种类型找到额外的支持。研究1包括对所有关于生活意义的研究进行系统的文献综述,通过主题分析来确定意义的类型和子类型。研究2从概念上将这些发现与其他已发表的意义类型学进行了比较。研究3在“意义六重奏问卷”(MSQ)中对这种类型进行了操作。MSQ采用顺序混合方法研究设计,包括项目开发、三步测试-访谈、非正式可行性研究和正式调查的子研究。文献综述在涉及45710名参与者的107项研究中确定了6种类型和29种亚类型的意义,并整合和扩展了其他已发表的类型:物质主义意义类型(物质条件、专业教育成功)、享乐主义意义类型(享乐主义/具体化经验)、自我导向意义类型(弹性、自我效能、自我接纳、自主性、创造性自我表达、自我照顾)、社会意义类型(社会联系、归属感、因循守规、利他主义和儿童)、更大意义类型(目的、个人成长、时间性、正义/伦理和灵性/宗教)、存在哲学意义类型(活着、独特、自由、自由)、感恩,负责)。MSQ在49个国家的1281名参与者中证实了这一意义六元组的普遍性,其因素结构和相关性与其他问卷的预期一致。物质主义、享乐主义和自我导向意义与低心理幸福感相关,而社会意义和更大意义与高心理幸福感相关。总之,意义六重奏似乎是一种全面有效的生活意义类型,可用于心理治疗,咨询,指导和教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Constructivist Psychology
Journal of Constructivist Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Psychology and related disciplines throughout the human sciences and humanities have been revolutionized by a postmodern emphasis on the role of language, human systems, and personal knowledge in the construction of social realities. The Journal of Constructivist Psychology is the first publication to provide a professional forum for this emerging focus, embracing such diverse expressions of constructivism as personal construct theory, constructivist marriage and family therapy, structural-developmental and language-based approaches to psychology, and narrative psychology.
期刊最新文献
A Call to Reflexivity: Working with Metaphor, Weaving Voices, and Progressing Conversations Reverberation Between I-Positions: How Border Tensions Function in Meaning Construction The Construction of the Narrative Self: Applying the Internal Multi-Actor Performance Method for Children (IMAP-C) to Help Children Cope with Emotional Distress “Do You Know Where the Dragons Are?” - Introducing a Novel Enactive Framework to Map the Wide Unknown of Social Spaces With Neurodivergent Young People Can a Lighthouse Survive a Tsunami? Collection of Experiences on How to Weather the Storm of Medicalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1