The Double-voiced Nature of Becoming a Teacher in the Era of Neoliberal Teaching and Teacher Education

Q2 Social Sciences Action in Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI:10.1080/01626620.2020.1863283
Christopher P. Brown, K. Puckett, David P. Barry, D. Ku
{"title":"The Double-voiced Nature of Becoming a Teacher in the Era of Neoliberal Teaching and Teacher Education","authors":"Christopher P. Brown, K. Puckett, David P. Barry, D. Ku","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2020.1863283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As policy makers’ neoliberal reforms continue to impact teaching and teacher education, stakeholders across both fields of teaching continue to seek out alternative practices that assist educators in fostering democratic learning experiences for children in schools. However, many continue to struggle with the impact of these reforms on their teaching. Thus, there is a need to better understand how to support preservice teachers in authoring themselves so that they enter the profession in a manner that allows them to speak back to policy makers’ demands and engage in democratic teaching and learning processes with their students. The instrumental case study examined in this article investigated this issue by examining how a sample of preservice teachers in a large urban teacher education program authored themselves as teachers who spoke with and against policy makers’ neoliberal reforms. These findings demonstrate that while preservice teachers appear willing to pursue alternative visions of schooling they still seem to focus on individualized choices in avoiding policy makers’ reforms. Thus, there appears to be opportunities for teacher educators to support preservice teachers in developing the skills required to speak back to policy makers’ neoliberal reforms so that they can author themselves as the teachers they want to be.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1863283","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1863283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT As policy makers’ neoliberal reforms continue to impact teaching and teacher education, stakeholders across both fields of teaching continue to seek out alternative practices that assist educators in fostering democratic learning experiences for children in schools. However, many continue to struggle with the impact of these reforms on their teaching. Thus, there is a need to better understand how to support preservice teachers in authoring themselves so that they enter the profession in a manner that allows them to speak back to policy makers’ demands and engage in democratic teaching and learning processes with their students. The instrumental case study examined in this article investigated this issue by examining how a sample of preservice teachers in a large urban teacher education program authored themselves as teachers who spoke with and against policy makers’ neoliberal reforms. These findings demonstrate that while preservice teachers appear willing to pursue alternative visions of schooling they still seem to focus on individualized choices in avoiding policy makers’ reforms. Thus, there appears to be opportunities for teacher educators to support preservice teachers in developing the skills required to speak back to policy makers’ neoliberal reforms so that they can author themselves as the teachers they want to be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新自由主义教学与教师教育时代的教师双重性
随着政策制定者的新自由主义改革继续影响教学和教师教育,这两个教学领域的利益相关者继续寻求替代实践,以帮助教育工作者在学校为儿童培养民主的学习体验。然而,许多学校仍在努力应对这些改革对教学的影响。因此,有必要更好地了解如何支持职前教师进行自我创作,以便他们进入这一职业时能够回应决策者的要求,并与学生一起参与民主的教学和学习过程。本文的工具性案例研究考察了这一问题,通过考察一个大型城市教师教育项目中的职前教师样本如何将自己塑造成支持和反对政策制定者新自由主义改革的教师。这些发现表明,虽然职前教师似乎愿意追求不同的教育愿景,但他们似乎仍然专注于个性化的选择,以避免政策制定者的改革。因此,教师教育工作者似乎有机会支持职前教师发展必要的技能,以回应政策制定者的新自由主义改革,这样他们就可以把自己塑造成他们想成为的教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Hurdles and Straightaways: Building a Cross-School Community of Practice White Preservice Teachers and Antiracist Practice: Enabling Trajectories of Learning and Identity in Teacher Preparation Engaging with Engagement: Interrogating Preservice Teachers’ Theories of Engagement in Their Literacy Planning and Reflection Applying an Equity Framework to Develop Inclusive Visions of STEM Teaching: Honoring the Voices of Students with Dis/Abilities Nearby Nature: An Interdisciplinary Science, Literacy, and Technology Project Situated within a Traditional Teacher Preparation Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1