Cultural Evolution, Disinformation, and Social Division

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Adaptive Behavior Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1177/10597123231186432
R. Bentley, Benjamin Horne, J. Borycz, S. Carrignon, Garriy Shteynberg, Blai Vidiella, S. Valverde, Michael J. O'Brien
{"title":"Cultural Evolution, Disinformation, and Social Division","authors":"R. Bentley, Benjamin Horne, J. Borycz, S. Carrignon, Garriy Shteynberg, Blai Vidiella, S. Valverde, Michael J. O'Brien","doi":"10.1177/10597123231186432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diversity of expertise is inherent to cultural evolution. When it is transparent, diversity of human knowledge is useful; when social conformity overcomes that transparency, “expertise” can lead to divisiveness. This is especially true today, where social media has increasingly allowed misinformation to spread by prioritizing what is recent and popular, regardless of validity or general benefit. Whereas in traditional societies there was diversity of expertise, contemporary social media facilitates homophily, which isolates true subject experts from each other and from the wider population. Diversity of knowledge thus becomes social division. Here, we discuss the potential of a cultural-evolutionary framework designed for the countless choices in contemporary media. Cultural-evolutionary theory identifies key factors that determine whether communication networks unify or fragment knowledge. Our approach highlights two parameters: transparency of information and social conformity. By identifying online spaces exhibiting aggregate patterns of high popularity bias and low transparency of information, we can help define the “safe limits” of social conformity and information overload in digital communications.","PeriodicalId":55552,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123231186432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diversity of expertise is inherent to cultural evolution. When it is transparent, diversity of human knowledge is useful; when social conformity overcomes that transparency, “expertise” can lead to divisiveness. This is especially true today, where social media has increasingly allowed misinformation to spread by prioritizing what is recent and popular, regardless of validity or general benefit. Whereas in traditional societies there was diversity of expertise, contemporary social media facilitates homophily, which isolates true subject experts from each other and from the wider population. Diversity of knowledge thus becomes social division. Here, we discuss the potential of a cultural-evolutionary framework designed for the countless choices in contemporary media. Cultural-evolutionary theory identifies key factors that determine whether communication networks unify or fragment knowledge. Our approach highlights two parameters: transparency of information and social conformity. By identifying online spaces exhibiting aggregate patterns of high popularity bias and low transparency of information, we can help define the “safe limits” of social conformity and information overload in digital communications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化进化、虚假信息与社会分化
专业知识的多样性是文化进化所固有的。当它是透明的,人类知识的多样性是有用的;当社会一致性克服了这种透明度时,“专业知识”可能会导致分裂。今天尤其如此,社交媒体越来越允许错误信息传播,因为它优先考虑最近流行的内容,而不考虑有效性或普遍利益。在传统社会中,专业知识存在多样性,而当代社交媒体则促进了同质性,这将真正的学科专家相互隔离,并与更广泛的人群隔离开来。因此,知识的多样性变成了社会分化。在这里,我们讨论了为当代媒体中的无数选择而设计的文化进化框架的潜力。文化进化理论确定了决定通信网络是统一知识还是割裂知识的关键因素。我们的方法强调了两个参数:信息的透明度和社会一致性。通过识别表现出高人气偏见和低信息透明度的总体模式的在线空间,我们可以帮助定义数字通信中社会一致性和信息过载的“安全极限”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Behavior
Adaptive Behavior 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: _Adaptive Behavior_ publishes articles on adaptive behaviour in living organisms and autonomous artificial systems. The official journal of the _International Society of Adaptive Behavior_, _Adaptive Behavior_, addresses topics such as perception and motor control, embodied cognition, learning and evolution, neural mechanisms, artificial intelligence, behavioral sequences, motivation and emotion, characterization of environments, decision making, collective and social behavior, navigation, foraging, communication and signalling. Print ISSN: 1059-7123
期刊最新文献
Environmental complexity, cognition, and plant stress physiology A model of how hierarchical representations constructed in the hippocampus are used to navigate through space Mechanical Problem Solving in Goffin’s Cockatoos—Towards Modeling Complex Behavior Coupling First-Person Cognitive Research With Neurophilosophy and Enactivism: An Outline of Arguments The origin and function of external representations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1