Usability perception of the health information systems in Brazil: the view of hospital health professionals on the electronic health record

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS RAUSP Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI:10.1108/rausp-02-2021-0023
Vandoir Welchen, Juliana Matte, Cintia Paese Giacomello, Franciele Dalle Molle, M. Camargo
{"title":"Usability perception of the health information systems in Brazil: the view of hospital health professionals on the electronic health record","authors":"Vandoir Welchen, Juliana Matte, Cintia Paese Giacomello, Franciele Dalle Molle, M. Camargo","doi":"10.1108/rausp-02-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to validate and measure the overall evaluation of electronic health record (EHR) and identify the factors that influence the health information systems (HIS) assessment in Brazil.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFrom February to May 2020, this study surveyed 262 doctors and nurses who work in hospitals and use the EHR in their workplace. This study validated the National Usability-focused HIS Scale (NuHISS) to measure usability in the Brazilian context.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed adequate validity and reliability, validating the NuHISS in the Brazilian context. The survey showed that 38.9% of users rated the system as high quality. Technical quality, ease of use and benefits explained 43.5% of the user’s overall system evaluation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study validated the items that measure usability of health-care systems and identified that not all usability items impact the overall evaluation of the EHR.\n\n\nPractical implications\nNuHISS can be a valuable tool to measure HIS usability for doctors and nurses and monitor health systems’ long-term usability among health professionals. The results suggest dissatisfaction with the usability of HIS systems, specifically the EHR in hospital units. For this reason, those responsible for health systems must observe usability. This tool enables usability monitoring to highlight information system deficiencies for public managers. Furthermore, the government can create and develop actions to improve the existing tools to support health professionals.\n\n\nSocial implications\nFrom the scale validation, public managers could monitor and develop actions to foster the system’s usability, especially the system’s technical qualities – the factor that impacted the overall system evaluation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to validate the usability scale of EHR systems in Brazil. The results showed dissatisfaction with HIS and identified the factors that most influence the system evaluation.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-02-2021-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to validate and measure the overall evaluation of electronic health record (EHR) and identify the factors that influence the health information systems (HIS) assessment in Brazil. Design/methodology/approach From February to May 2020, this study surveyed 262 doctors and nurses who work in hospitals and use the EHR in their workplace. This study validated the National Usability-focused HIS Scale (NuHISS) to measure usability in the Brazilian context. Findings The results showed adequate validity and reliability, validating the NuHISS in the Brazilian context. The survey showed that 38.9% of users rated the system as high quality. Technical quality, ease of use and benefits explained 43.5% of the user’s overall system evaluation. Research limitations/implications This study validated the items that measure usability of health-care systems and identified that not all usability items impact the overall evaluation of the EHR. Practical implications NuHISS can be a valuable tool to measure HIS usability for doctors and nurses and monitor health systems’ long-term usability among health professionals. The results suggest dissatisfaction with the usability of HIS systems, specifically the EHR in hospital units. For this reason, those responsible for health systems must observe usability. This tool enables usability monitoring to highlight information system deficiencies for public managers. Furthermore, the government can create and develop actions to improve the existing tools to support health professionals. Social implications From the scale validation, public managers could monitor and develop actions to foster the system’s usability, especially the system’s technical qualities – the factor that impacted the overall system evaluation. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to validate the usability scale of EHR systems in Brazil. The results showed dissatisfaction with HIS and identified the factors that most influence the system evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西卫生信息系统的可用性感知:医院卫生专业人员对电子健康记录的看法
目的本文旨在验证和衡量电子健康记录(EHR)的总体评估,并确定影响巴西健康信息系统(HIS)评估的因素。设计/方法/方法2020年2月至5月,本研究调查了262名在医院工作并在工作场所使用EHR的医生和护士。本研究验证了以国家可用性为重点的HIS量表(NuHISS),以衡量巴西环境中的可用性。研究结果显示了足够的有效性和可靠性,验证了NuHISS在巴西的应用。调查显示,38.9%的用户认为该系统质量上乘。技术质量、易用性和优点解释了43.5%的用户整体系统评估。研究局限性/含义本研究验证了衡量医疗保健系统可用性的项目,并确定并非所有可用性项目都会影响EHR的整体评估。实际含义NuHISS可以成为衡量医生和护士HIS可用性和监测卫生系统在卫生专业人员中长期可用性的宝贵工具。结果表明,人们对HIS系统的可用性,特别是医院单位的EHR不满意。因此,负责卫生系统的人员必须遵守可用性。该工具使可用性监控能够突出公共管理人员的信息系统缺陷。此外,政府可以制定和制定行动,改进现有的工具,以支持卫生专业人员。社会含义通过量表验证,公共管理人员可以监督和制定行动,以提高系统的可用性,特别是系统的技术质量——这是影响整个系统评估的因素。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次验证了巴西EHR系统的可用性量表。结果显示了对HIS的不满,并确定了对系统评估影响最大的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring off-chain voting and blockchain in decentralized autonomous organizations Entrepreneurial intentions and the role of educational and social support: do the self-efficacy and the theory of planned behavior variables matter? Corporate reputation in Brazil: do board characteristics matter? Motivation for women’s football: a competing scales study Understanding the role of physical trial for good shopping decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1