{"title":"At the crossroads of the New Silk Road: News discourses in the Turkish press","authors":"Banu Dağtaş","doi":"10.1177/2057047319896214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article employs ‘critical discourse analysis’ to explore contending discourses around the ‘New Silk Road’ in Turkish newspapers. The press analysis covers the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. It includes pro-government newspapers (Sabah, Star and Takvim – liberal); oppositional newspapers (Birgün, Günlük Evrensel – socialist, Cumhuriyet – social democratic, Yeniçağ – nationalist right); one liberal newspaper (Hürriyet – non-aligned); and a semi-oppositional and Eurasianist title (Aydınlık). The dominant discourses of the newspapers sampled are mainly organized around recontextualizations of President Erdoğan’s statements on the New Silk Road and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway. These discourses present the New Silk Road as promoting peace, security and prosperity (with Transport Minister’s statement of a prospective 31 trillion dollar market) and initiating a new era in relations with China. Only the socialist and oppositional newspaper Günlük Evrensel does not recontextualize Erdoğan’s statements within this framework. The oppositional/socialist Birgün and the oppositional/social democratic Cumhuriyet, however, raise some criticisms of the New Silk Road project. Erdoğan’s central position as the main news actor and the domination of his statements on the New Silk Road and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars in the news discourse legitimate both his authoritarian rule and abuse power and his wish for rapprochement with China. The second foregrounding news discourse is the ‘business discourse’ – centred on investment, trade and market share, running in parallel to the government discourse in every newspaper analysed, except the socialist and oppositional newspapers Birgün and Günlük Evrensel. Only the socialist newspaper Birgün examines the New Silk Road from the side of labour. The Eurasianist party paper Aydınlık constructs the discourse of ‘strong defence of New Silk Road and China’.","PeriodicalId":44233,"journal":{"name":"Communication and the Public","volume":"4 1","pages":"276 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2057047319896214","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication and the Public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319896214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article employs ‘critical discourse analysis’ to explore contending discourses around the ‘New Silk Road’ in Turkish newspapers. The press analysis covers the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. It includes pro-government newspapers (Sabah, Star and Takvim – liberal); oppositional newspapers (Birgün, Günlük Evrensel – socialist, Cumhuriyet – social democratic, Yeniçağ – nationalist right); one liberal newspaper (Hürriyet – non-aligned); and a semi-oppositional and Eurasianist title (Aydınlık). The dominant discourses of the newspapers sampled are mainly organized around recontextualizations of President Erdoğan’s statements on the New Silk Road and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway. These discourses present the New Silk Road as promoting peace, security and prosperity (with Transport Minister’s statement of a prospective 31 trillion dollar market) and initiating a new era in relations with China. Only the socialist and oppositional newspaper Günlük Evrensel does not recontextualize Erdoğan’s statements within this framework. The oppositional/socialist Birgün and the oppositional/social democratic Cumhuriyet, however, raise some criticisms of the New Silk Road project. Erdoğan’s central position as the main news actor and the domination of his statements on the New Silk Road and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars in the news discourse legitimate both his authoritarian rule and abuse power and his wish for rapprochement with China. The second foregrounding news discourse is the ‘business discourse’ – centred on investment, trade and market share, running in parallel to the government discourse in every newspaper analysed, except the socialist and oppositional newspapers Birgün and Günlük Evrensel. Only the socialist newspaper Birgün examines the New Silk Road from the side of labour. The Eurasianist party paper Aydınlık constructs the discourse of ‘strong defence of New Silk Road and China’.
本文采用“批判性话语分析”来探讨土耳其报纸上围绕“新丝绸之路”的争论话语。新闻分析涵盖2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间。它包括亲政府报纸(《沙巴报》、《星报》和《自由报》);反对派报纸(birg n, g nl k Evrensel -社会主义,Cumhuriyet -社会民主主义,yeniazu -民族主义右翼);一份自由主义报纸(h ririyet -不结盟);以及半对立的欧亚主义标题(Aydınlık)。抽样报纸的主要话语主要围绕Erdoğan总统关于新丝绸之路和巴库-第比利斯-卡尔斯铁路的声明的重新语境组织。这些演讲将新丝绸之路描述为促进和平、安全与繁荣(交通部长关于未来31万亿美元市场的声明),并开启了与中国关系的新时代。只有社会主义和反对派报纸《 nl k Evrensel》没有在这个框架内重新审视Erdoğan的言论。然而,反对/社会主义的birg和反对/社会民主的Cumhuriyet对新丝绸之路项目提出了一些批评。Erdoğan作为主要新闻演员的中心地位,以及他关于新丝绸之路和巴库-第比利斯-卡尔斯的言论在新闻话语中的主导地位,既证明了他的专制统治和滥用权力,也证明了他希望与中国和解的愿望。第二种前景新闻话语是“商业话语”——以投资、贸易和市场份额为中心,除了社会主义和反对派报纸《birg n》和《g nl k Evrensel》外,在所有被分析的报纸中都与政府话语并行。只有社会主义报纸《birg》从劳工的角度审视了新丝绸之路。欧亚主义党报Aydınlık构建了“大力捍卫新丝绸之路和中国”的话语。