Stanley Hoffmann’s International Liberalism and the Quest for a Realistic Utopia

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Tocqueville Review Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3138/TTR.39.2.93
Nancy Bertoldi
{"title":"Stanley Hoffmann’s International Liberalism and the Quest for a Realistic Utopia","authors":"Nancy Bertoldi","doi":"10.3138/TTR.39.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As a committed liberal, Stanley Hoffmann devoted his life’s work to the protection of vulnerable individuals in the stormy context of world affairs. This article explores Hoffmann’s international liberalism in relation to the international liberalism of John Rawls, whose work Hoffmann described as learned and fascinating, but of little relevance to reality for international relations. This is surprising in light of their shared emphases on reforming state institutions and reconciling citizenship with cosmopolitan duty. I suggest that Hoffmann’s skepticism is rooted in his unease with Rawls’s re-deployment of the social contract to describe a “realistic utopia” for international relations, which Hoffmann considered to be both overly utopian and overly realistic, as becomes particularly vivid in relation to the place of nonliberal peoples in a liberal international society. Despite these disagreements, I suggest that Hoffmann shared many of Rawls’s key positions and aspirations, and that the two must be seen as fellow travelers in the global project of political liberalism.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"112 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.39.2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:As a committed liberal, Stanley Hoffmann devoted his life’s work to the protection of vulnerable individuals in the stormy context of world affairs. This article explores Hoffmann’s international liberalism in relation to the international liberalism of John Rawls, whose work Hoffmann described as learned and fascinating, but of little relevance to reality for international relations. This is surprising in light of their shared emphases on reforming state institutions and reconciling citizenship with cosmopolitan duty. I suggest that Hoffmann’s skepticism is rooted in his unease with Rawls’s re-deployment of the social contract to describe a “realistic utopia” for international relations, which Hoffmann considered to be both overly utopian and overly realistic, as becomes particularly vivid in relation to the place of nonliberal peoples in a liberal international society. Despite these disagreements, I suggest that Hoffmann shared many of Rawls’s key positions and aspirations, and that the two must be seen as fellow travelers in the global project of political liberalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯坦利·霍夫曼的《国际自由主义与对现实乌托邦的追求》
摘要:作为一名坚定的自由主义者,斯坦利·霍夫曼毕生致力于在风云变幻的世界事务背景下保护弱势群体。本文探讨了霍夫曼的国际自由主义与约翰·罗尔斯的国际自由主义的关系,霍夫曼称罗尔斯的工作是有学问的,令人着迷的,但与国际关系的现实关系不大。考虑到他们都强调改革国家机构,协调公民身份与世界责任,这一点令人惊讶。我认为霍夫曼的怀疑源于他对罗尔斯重新部署社会契约来描述国际关系的“现实主义乌托邦”的不安,霍夫曼认为这既过于乌托邦又过于现实,这在与自由主义国际社会中非自由主义民族的地位有关时变得尤为生动。尽管存在这些分歧,但我认为霍夫曼与罗尔斯有许多共同的关键立场和愿望,这两人必须被视为政治自由主义全球工程的同路人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
La conversion de l'histoire est-elle possible ? Les limites de l'influence de Carl Schmitt sur Raymond Aron : le concept de souveraineté de l'État et celui de l'hostilité absolue The American Red Cross and Disaster Relief in the 1960s: Nonprofits and Mass Philanthropy in an Era of Rising Expectations Comprendre "L'homme qui comprit la démocratie": Table ronde autour de l'ouvrage d'Olivier Zunz Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise The People's Branch: The U.S. Congress and the Democratic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1