Effect of shoulder positioning on ultrasonic visualisation of the subclavian vein in healthy adults: A prospective observational study

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-14 DOI:10.1177/10249079211000969
Hei Jim Leung, L. Y. Wong, C. Pak, Yang Li Chuan Marc
{"title":"Effect of shoulder positioning on ultrasonic visualisation of the subclavian vein in healthy adults: A prospective observational study","authors":"Hei Jim Leung, L. Y. Wong, C. Pak, Yang Li Chuan Marc","doi":"10.1177/10249079211000969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ultrasound guidance is commonly used during central venous cannulation. Subclavian vein is a commonly chosen site, but previous studies found varying results in the ideal positioning of the shoulder for subclavian vein cannulation. The objective of this study is to determine which shoulder position results in the greatest cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein for cannulation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, ultrasound was performed on healthy adult volunteers to visualise the right subclavian vein in three different shoulder positions: neutral, abduction and retraction. A blinded independent investigator measured the cross-sectional areas by computer software using planimetry method. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Forty-four adults participated in the study. The mean cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein in shoulder neutral, abduction and retraction positions were 1.05 ± 0.33 cm2, 1.01 ± 0.31 cm2 and 0.82 ± 0.28 cm2, respectively. When compared to shoulder retraction, the cross-sectional areas were significantly increased in shoulder neutral (P < 0.01) and abduction (P < 0.01) positions. There was no significant difference between shoulder neutral and abduction position (P = 0.71). Conclusion: Positioning the shoulder in neutral or abduction results in the greatest cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein and may be more ideal for ultrasound guided cannulation.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10249079211000969","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10249079211000969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound guidance is commonly used during central venous cannulation. Subclavian vein is a commonly chosen site, but previous studies found varying results in the ideal positioning of the shoulder for subclavian vein cannulation. The objective of this study is to determine which shoulder position results in the greatest cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein for cannulation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, ultrasound was performed on healthy adult volunteers to visualise the right subclavian vein in three different shoulder positions: neutral, abduction and retraction. A blinded independent investigator measured the cross-sectional areas by computer software using planimetry method. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Forty-four adults participated in the study. The mean cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein in shoulder neutral, abduction and retraction positions were 1.05 ± 0.33 cm2, 1.01 ± 0.31 cm2 and 0.82 ± 0.28 cm2, respectively. When compared to shoulder retraction, the cross-sectional areas were significantly increased in shoulder neutral (P < 0.01) and abduction (P < 0.01) positions. There was no significant difference between shoulder neutral and abduction position (P = 0.71). Conclusion: Positioning the shoulder in neutral or abduction results in the greatest cross-sectional area of the right subclavian vein and may be more ideal for ultrasound guided cannulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩部定位对健康成年人锁骨下静脉超声显像的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究
引言:超声引导在中心静脉插管过程中常用。锁骨下静脉是一个常见的选择部位,但先前的研究发现,在锁骨下静脉插管的理想肩部定位方面存在不同的结果。本研究的目的是确定哪种肩部位置导致右锁骨下静脉插管的横截面积最大。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,对健康成年志愿者进行超声检查,以观察三种不同肩部位置的右锁骨下静脉:中性、外展和回缩。一名盲法独立研究者使用平面测量法通过计算机软件测量横截面积。统计分析采用单因素重复测量方差分析。结果:44名成年人参与了这项研究。肩中性位、外展位和回缩位的右锁骨下静脉平均横截面积为1.05 ± 0.33 cm2,1.01 ± 0.31 cm2和0.82 ± 0.28 cm2。与肩部收缩相比,中性肩关节的横截面积显著增加(P < 0.01)和外展(P < 0.01)位置。肩中立位与外展位比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.71)。结论:将肩部置于中立或外展位置可使右锁骨下静脉的横截面积最大,可能更适合超声引导插管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical ventilation management and airway pressure release ventilation practice in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A cross‐sectional survey of intensive care unit clinicians in mainland China Comparison of film array pneumonia panel to routine diagnostic methods and its potential impact in an adult intensive care unit in Hong Kong and the potential role of emergency departments Questionnaire survey on point‐of‐care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest among emergency physicians in Hong Kong Burnout in emergency physicians in Hong Kong—A cross‐sectional study on its prevalence, associated factors, and impact Factors for predicting 28‐day mortality in older patients with suspected of having sepsis in the emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1