Social preferences before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in China

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009438
King King Li, Yingyi Hong, Bo Huang, Tony Tam
{"title":"Social preferences before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in\n China","authors":"King King Li, Yingyi Hong, Bo Huang, Tony Tam","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study compares Chinese people’s trust and trustworthiness, risk\n attitude, and time preference before and after the onset of the COVID-19\n pandemic in China. We compare the preferences of subjects in two online\n experiments with samples drawn from 31 provinces across mainland China\n before and after the onset of the pandemic. We test two competing hypotheses\n regarding trust and trustworthiness. On the one hand, the outbreak as a\n collective threat could enhance in-group cohesion and cooperation and thus\n increase trust and trustworthiness. On the other hand, to the extent that\n people expect their future income to decline, they may become more\n self-protective and self-controlled, and thus less trusting and trustworthy\n and more risk averse and patient. Comparing before and after the onset, we\n found that the subjects increased in trustworthiness. After the onset, trust\n and trustworthiness (and risk aversion and present bias too) were positively\n correlated with the COVID-19 prevalence rate in the provinces. Subjects with\n more pessimistic expectations about income change showed more risk aversion\n and lower discount rates, supporting the speculation concerning\n self-control.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study compares Chinese people’s trust and trustworthiness, risk attitude, and time preference before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. We compare the preferences of subjects in two online experiments with samples drawn from 31 provinces across mainland China before and after the onset of the pandemic. We test two competing hypotheses regarding trust and trustworthiness. On the one hand, the outbreak as a collective threat could enhance in-group cohesion and cooperation and thus increase trust and trustworthiness. On the other hand, to the extent that people expect their future income to decline, they may become more self-protective and self-controlled, and thus less trusting and trustworthy and more risk averse and patient. Comparing before and after the onset, we found that the subjects increased in trustworthiness. After the onset, trust and trustworthiness (and risk aversion and present bias too) were positively correlated with the COVID-19 prevalence rate in the provinces. Subjects with more pessimistic expectations about income change showed more risk aversion and lower discount rates, supporting the speculation concerning self-control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国新冠肺炎疫情发生前后的社会偏好
本研究比较了新冠肺炎疫情发生前后国人的信任可信度、风险态度和时间偏好。我们比较了两项在线实验中受试者的偏好,这些实验样本来自中国大陆31个省份,在疫情爆发前后。我们测试了关于信任和可信赖性的两个相互竞争的假设。一方面,疫情作为一种集体威胁,可以增强群体内部的凝聚力和合作,从而增加信任和可信度。另一方面,在某种程度上,人们预期他们未来的收入会下降,他们可能会变得更加自我保护和自我控制,从而减少信任和值得信赖,更加厌恶风险和耐心。对比发作前后,我们发现被试的可信度有所提高。发病后,各省的信任和可信度(以及风险厌恶和当前偏见)与COVID-19患病率呈正相关。对收入变化预期更悲观的受试者表现出更多的风险厌恶和更低的贴现率,支持有关自我控制的猜测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1