Assessing and improving co-creation in services: the customer-centric matrix

Arbia Chatmi, Karim Elasri, Frédéric Ponsignon
{"title":"Assessing and improving co-creation in services: the customer-centric matrix","authors":"Arbia Chatmi, Karim Elasri, Frédéric Ponsignon","doi":"10.1108/ijqss-11-2021-0177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe strategy of co-creation with customers is a fast-growing topic within the academic community, which companies are trying to master. This study aims to elucidate the range of possible co-creation strategies and identify how service firms can assess and improve co-creation to reap the most benefits.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study examines 13 companies from five service industries, using netnography to analyse how they approach co-creation. The firms’ co-creation strategy is analysed according to the forms of co-creation they choose and the type of activities involved in the value chain, primary, support and corporate social responsibility (CSR).\n\n\nFindings\nThis study identifies three co-creation axes (C3) for companies: primary activities, support activities and CSR activities. Then, four levels of customer involvement (A4) are defined as follows: levels zero (await), one (advise), two (assist) and three (act). As such, this study positions firms according to the A4C3 customer-centric matrix.\n\n\nPractical implications\nIn this co-creation benchmark, firms should use the A4C3 customer-centric matrix to understand their positions vis-à-vis competitors. This allows firms to establish an appropriate co-creation strategy for their services so that customers are the actors in their personalised service.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is the first to propose a framework through which a company can identify three types of co-creation activities (primary, secondary, CSR; C3), using it to increase co-creation and draw inspiration from other companies.\n","PeriodicalId":14403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-11-2021-0177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The strategy of co-creation with customers is a fast-growing topic within the academic community, which companies are trying to master. This study aims to elucidate the range of possible co-creation strategies and identify how service firms can assess and improve co-creation to reap the most benefits. Design/methodology/approach This study examines 13 companies from five service industries, using netnography to analyse how they approach co-creation. The firms’ co-creation strategy is analysed according to the forms of co-creation they choose and the type of activities involved in the value chain, primary, support and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Findings This study identifies three co-creation axes (C3) for companies: primary activities, support activities and CSR activities. Then, four levels of customer involvement (A4) are defined as follows: levels zero (await), one (advise), two (assist) and three (act). As such, this study positions firms according to the A4C3 customer-centric matrix. Practical implications In this co-creation benchmark, firms should use the A4C3 customer-centric matrix to understand their positions vis-à-vis competitors. This allows firms to establish an appropriate co-creation strategy for their services so that customers are the actors in their personalised service. Originality/value This study is the first to propose a framework through which a company can identify three types of co-creation activities (primary, secondary, CSR; C3), using it to increase co-creation and draw inspiration from other companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和改进服务中的共同创造:以客户为中心的矩阵
与客户共同创造战略是学术界一个快速发展的话题,各公司都在努力掌握它。本研究旨在阐明可能的共同创造策略的范围,并确定服务公司如何评估和改善共同创造以获得最大利益。设计/方法/方法本研究考察了来自五个服务行业的13家公司,使用网络学来分析他们如何进行共同创造。根据企业选择的共同创造形式和参与价值链、初级、支持和企业社会责任(CSR)的活动类型,分析了企业的共同创造战略。本研究确定了公司的三个共同创造轴(C3):主要活动、支持活动和企业社会责任活动。然后,定义了四个级别的客户参与(A4): 0级(等待),1级(建议),2级(协助)和3级(行动)。因此,本研究根据A4C3客户中心矩阵对公司进行定位。在这个共同创造基准中,企业应该使用A4C3以客户为中心的矩阵来了解他们相对于-à-vis竞争对手的地位。这允许公司为他们的服务建立一个适当的共同创造战略,这样客户就成为他们个性化服务的参与者。独创性/价值本研究首次提出了一个框架,通过该框架,公司可以识别三种类型的共同创造活动(主要,次要,企业社会责任;C3),用它来增加共同创造,并从其他公司汲取灵感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences seeks to explore various aspects of quality and services as closely interrelated phenomena in the context of ongoing transformation processes of organizations and societies. Thus the journals'' scope is not limited to micro perspectives of organizational and management related issues. It seeks further to explore patterns, behaviors, processes, mechanisms, principles and consequences related to quality and services in a broad range of organizational and social/global processes. These processes embrace cultural, economic, social, environmental and even global dimensions in order to better understand the past, to better diagnose the current situations and hence to design better the future. The journal seeks to embrace a holistic view of quality and service sector management and explicitly promotes the emerging field of ‘quality and service sciences’.The journal is an open forum and one of the main channels for communication of multi- and inter- disciplinary research and practices.
期刊最新文献
Elevating service startup survival through strategic service quality Quality leadership, technology integration and patient care quality across countries: moderating roles of national culture and infrastructure development After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry Brand addiction: Wow! or woe?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1