A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in higher education

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1104005
Fatma Şeyma Yüksel, Ayşe Nilgün Kayadelen, Figen Antmen
{"title":"A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in higher education","authors":"Fatma Şeyma Yüksel, Ayşe Nilgün Kayadelen, Figen Antmen","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1104005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three components that form the basis of the educational process are the teacher, the learner, and the environment. These three components are affected by the developing and changing technology as a result of globalization considerably. Teaching and learning techniques should be updated and connected with these developments; new tools are therefore needed to make the necessary updates. Determination and application of the new tools include many decisions. Decision-makers can make more effective decisions using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques (MCDM), a complex decision-making tool that includes both quantitative and qualitative factors at present time. This study aimed to determine which MCDM methods are used in studies conducted in higher education, which is one of the most important development level indicators of countries, and to present a systematic literature review of MCDM method applications. The study was conducted in three stages: first, known electronics were searched until the end of 2021 using keywords; then, all studies were listed in a systematic taxonomy, and in the last stage, Thematic Network Analysis was used to evaluate the development of MCDM studies in the higher education area. It is determined that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is the most widely used method in higher education in MCDM applications. It was observed that the most common use of MCDM applications in higher education is e-learning as well. This study aims to be a guide for all researchers and practitioners who will study in both higher education and the MCDM areas.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1104005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The three components that form the basis of the educational process are the teacher, the learner, and the environment. These three components are affected by the developing and changing technology as a result of globalization considerably. Teaching and learning techniques should be updated and connected with these developments; new tools are therefore needed to make the necessary updates. Determination and application of the new tools include many decisions. Decision-makers can make more effective decisions using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques (MCDM), a complex decision-making tool that includes both quantitative and qualitative factors at present time. This study aimed to determine which MCDM methods are used in studies conducted in higher education, which is one of the most important development level indicators of countries, and to present a systematic literature review of MCDM method applications. The study was conducted in three stages: first, known electronics were searched until the end of 2021 using keywords; then, all studies were listed in a systematic taxonomy, and in the last stage, Thematic Network Analysis was used to evaluate the development of MCDM studies in the higher education area. It is determined that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is the most widely used method in higher education in MCDM applications. It was observed that the most common use of MCDM applications in higher education is e-learning as well. This study aims to be a guide for all researchers and practitioners who will study in both higher education and the MCDM areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育多准则决策的系统文献综述
构成教育过程基础的三个组成部分是教师、学习者和环境。这三个组成部分在很大程度上受到全球化带来的技术发展和变化的影响。教学技术应该更新,并与这些发展相联系;因此需要新的工具来进行必要的更新。新工具的确定和应用包括许多决策。决策者可以使用多准则决策技术(MCDM)做出更有效的决策,这是一种复杂的决策工具,目前包括定量和定性因素。本研究旨在确定在高等教育研究中使用哪些MCDM方法,这是各国最重要的发展水平指标之一,并对MCDM方法的应用进行系统的文献综述。这项研究分三个阶段进行:首先,使用关键词搜索已知电子产品,直到2021年底;然后,将所有研究都列在一个系统的分类法中,并在最后阶段使用主题网络分析来评估MCDM研究在高等教育领域的发展。确定层次分析法(AHP)是MCDM应用中在高等教育中应用最广泛的方法。据观察,MCDM应用程序在高等教育中最常见的用途也是电子学习。本研究旨在为所有将在高等教育和MCDM领域学习的研究人员和从业者提供指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The complexity of the grading system in Turkish higher education Global competence scale: An adaptation to measure pre-service English teachers’ global competences Language Models in Automated Essay Scoring: Insights for the Turkish Language Type I error and power rates: A comparative analysis of techniques in differential item functioning A data pipeline for e-large-scale assessments: Better automation, quality assurance, and efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1