Croatia and the Chinese “17+1” Cooperation Framework

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Croatian International Relations Review Pub Date : 2020-04-30 DOI:10.37173/cirr.26.86.5
Z. Stopić
{"title":"Croatia and the Chinese “17+1” Cooperation Framework","authors":"Z. Stopić","doi":"10.37173/cirr.26.86.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Pelješac bridge construction project was\nawarded to the Chinese company China Road and Bridge Cooperation (CRBC) in\nJanuary 2018, the Sino-Croatian relations reached a new high point. Since then,\nand contrary to Croatia’s past activity and interest, Croatia not only opted to\nmore actively participate in the “17+1” cooperation framework, but even stepped\nforward by hosting the latest “17+1” summit, held in April 2019. The rekindled\nrelations have since been, on the surface, bursting with possibilities regarding\ninvestment, exchanges of personnel, and cooperation on various levels. However,\nyears of neglect, especially on the Croatian side, had created a situation in\nwhich Croatia is critically falling behind in experts, Chinese-speaking\ntalents, and various aspects of knowledge needed to support this level of\ncooperation. Furthermore, judging by the press releases and the lack of\nclarifications from the Croatian government regarding the short-term decisions\nand the long-term direction the renewed Sino-Croatian friendship is taking,\ngeneral understanding of how concepts such as the “17+1” or the Belt and Road\nInitiative actually reflect on Croatia with regards to their influence on the\nwider regional and global circumstances is also lacking. This paper analyses the\nwidth of the uneven approach China and Croatia are taking in the development of\ntheir relations and will attempt to address the issues and challenges that\ncould arise from this unevenness.","PeriodicalId":35243,"journal":{"name":"Croatian International Relations Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.37173/cirr.26.86.5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian International Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37173/cirr.26.86.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Since the Pelješac bridge construction project was awarded to the Chinese company China Road and Bridge Cooperation (CRBC) in January 2018, the Sino-Croatian relations reached a new high point. Since then, and contrary to Croatia’s past activity and interest, Croatia not only opted to more actively participate in the “17+1” cooperation framework, but even stepped forward by hosting the latest “17+1” summit, held in April 2019. The rekindled relations have since been, on the surface, bursting with possibilities regarding investment, exchanges of personnel, and cooperation on various levels. However, years of neglect, especially on the Croatian side, had created a situation in which Croatia is critically falling behind in experts, Chinese-speaking talents, and various aspects of knowledge needed to support this level of cooperation. Furthermore, judging by the press releases and the lack of clarifications from the Croatian government regarding the short-term decisions and the long-term direction the renewed Sino-Croatian friendship is taking, general understanding of how concepts such as the “17+1” or the Belt and Road Initiative actually reflect on Croatia with regards to their influence on the wider regional and global circumstances is also lacking. This paper analyses the width of the uneven approach China and Croatia are taking in the development of their relations and will attempt to address the issues and challenges that could arise from this unevenness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚与中国“17+1合作框架”
自2018年1月Pelješac大桥建设项目被授予中国路桥合作公司以来,中克关系达到了新的高度。从那时起,克罗地亚不仅选择更积极地参与“17+1”合作框架,而且还在2019年4月主办了最新一次“17+1”峰会,这与克罗地亚以往的活动和兴趣不同。从表面上看,两国关系在投资、人员往来、各层次合作等方面充满了无限可能。然而,多年来的忽视,特别是克罗地亚方面的忽视,造成了克罗地亚在专家、说中文的人才和支持这种合作所需的各个方面的知识方面严重落后的局面。此外,从新闻稿和克罗地亚政府对中克友谊的短期决定和长期方向的缺乏澄清来看,对“17+1”或“一带一路”倡议等概念在克罗地亚对更广泛的地区和全球环境的影响方面的实际反映也缺乏总体理解。本文分析了中国和克罗地亚在发展两国关系中所采取的不平衡方法的宽度,并将试图解决这种不平衡可能产生的问题和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian International Relations Review
Croatian International Relations Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: The Croatian International Relations Review (CIRR) is an interdisciplinary academic journal published in English since 1995 and focuses on political science, sociology, law and economics. Each issue includes scholarly, double-blind peer reviewed articles, and book reviews. CIRR is a member of COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics – and is published electronically by the Institute for Development and International Relations (IRMO) in Zagreb. The journal is supported by the Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Croatia and is published in collaboration with De Gruyter Open, the world’s second largest publisher of Open Access academic content. CIRR is indexed by 40 scholarly databases, including ESCI, Scopus, Erih Plus, EconLit and Proquest Social Science Premium Collection. Articles reflect the views of their authors only.
期刊最新文献
Measuring the Success of the Presidency of the Council of the EU The Significance of Foreign Military Bases as Instruments of Spheres of Influence How do Lithuanian Citizens Perceive the European Parliament? EU Legitimacy Issue and Trust in the European Parliament On the Norms and Habits of the European Union as a Meta-organisation The Challenges to the Emergency Medical Services to be Recognised as a Human Right in International Human Rights Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1