Understanding critical thinking: A comparative analysis between university students’ and teachers’ conception

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Tuning Journal for Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.18543/tjhe.2515
M. Bezanilla, Héctor Galindo-Domínguez, Lucía Campo, Donna Fernández-Nogueira, Manuel Poblete Ruiz
{"title":"Understanding critical thinking: A comparative analysis between university students’ and teachers’ conception","authors":"M. Bezanilla, Héctor Galindo-Domínguez, Lucía Campo, Donna Fernández-Nogueira, Manuel Poblete Ruiz","doi":"10.18543/tjhe.2515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking is a key competence in higher education. However, little is known about the conception that students have of this competence. This study aims to analyze what university students understand by critical thinking and if these conceptions agree with those of university teachers analyzed in a previous study. A total of 263 participants took part in the study. The findings reveal that students tend to consider critical thinking as a competence related to reasoning/arguing and questioning/asking oneself. Also, that students’ conception about critical thinking differs from that of teachers. Whereas students tend to consider critical thinking as related to reasoning/arguing, questioning/asking oneself and, to a lesser extent, to acting/compromising. Teachers, on the other hand, tend to consider critical thinking as related to analyzing/organizing and evaluating. No significant differences were found regarding students’ gender and academic year. These results highlight the importance of considering students’ views when designing the curricula and the learning activities to develop students’ critical thinking. \nReceived: 30 June 2022Accepted: 6 March 2023","PeriodicalId":53788,"journal":{"name":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Critical thinking is a key competence in higher education. However, little is known about the conception that students have of this competence. This study aims to analyze what university students understand by critical thinking and if these conceptions agree with those of university teachers analyzed in a previous study. A total of 263 participants took part in the study. The findings reveal that students tend to consider critical thinking as a competence related to reasoning/arguing and questioning/asking oneself. Also, that students’ conception about critical thinking differs from that of teachers. Whereas students tend to consider critical thinking as related to reasoning/arguing, questioning/asking oneself and, to a lesser extent, to acting/compromising. Teachers, on the other hand, tend to consider critical thinking as related to analyzing/organizing and evaluating. No significant differences were found regarding students’ gender and academic year. These results highlight the importance of considering students’ views when designing the curricula and the learning activities to develop students’ critical thinking. Received: 30 June 2022Accepted: 6 March 2023
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解批判性思维:大学生与教师观念的比较分析
批判性思维是高等教育的关键能力。然而,人们对学生具备这种能力的概念知之甚少。本研究旨在分析大学生通过批判性思维理解的内容,以及这些概念是否与之前研究中分析的大学教师的概念一致。共有263名参与者参与了这项研究。研究结果表明,学生倾向于将批判性思维视为一种与推理/争论和提问/自问有关的能力。此外,学生对批判性思维的概念与教师的不同。而学生们倾向于认为批判性思维与推理/争论、质疑/自问有关,在较小程度上与行动/妥协有关。另一方面,教师往往认为批判性思维与分析/组织和评估有关。在学生的性别和学年方面没有发现显著差异。这些结果强调了在设计课程和学习活动时考虑学生观点的重要性,以培养学生的批判性思维。收到日期:2022年6月30日接受日期:2023年3月6日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Tuning Journal for Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Emerging strategies and challenges faced by professors during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) at a Colombian university The effects of online learning self-efficacy and attitude toward online learning in predicting academic performance: The case of online prospective mathematics teachers Teaching in a COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of university faculty in Spain The early years The impact of an active-learning designed faculty development program: A students’ perspective of an Italian university
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1