Myth and misconception about long-acting reversible contraception use among reproductive age group women in Debre Berhan governmental health centers, Ethiopia: qualitative study

Kidane G. Haileyes, H. Asfaw, S. G. Ayele, L. D. kitawu
{"title":"Myth and misconception about long-acting reversible contraception use among reproductive age group women in Debre Berhan governmental health centers, Ethiopia: qualitative study","authors":"Kidane G. Haileyes, H. Asfaw, S. G. Ayele, L. D. kitawu","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the effectiveness, convenience, and reversibility of fertility, long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use is still low in the world and Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Myths and misconceptions are believed to be one of the major reported barriers and impediments to LARC use. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate myths and misconceptions about LARC use among women of reproductive age in Debre Brehan town, Ethiopia, at governmental health centers. Methods: A qualitative study using a qualitative descriptive design was conducted from January 24 to April 15, 2022. Twenty-nine reproductive-age women who came for family planning services and 6 key informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique, and an in-depth interview technique with semistructured questionnaires was used to collect the data. The analysis was conducted using the thematic analysis method and ATLAS. ti9 qualitative software was used to support the analysis. Result: The findings of this study revealed that women had a variety of myths and misconceptions about the use of long-acting reversible contraception, including that it had an adverse impact on reproductive health problems and a predisposition to maternal and fetal illness; that the method was unsafe and ineffective in its characteristics; and that, socio-culturally, it was an unacceptable and undesirable method for women to use. Conclusion: This study indicates that there are widespread myths and misconceptions regarding long-acting reversible contraception use in reproductive-age women, which emanate from different concerns in the community. Measures should be taken by the concerned body to dispel or at least reduce these myths and misconceptions.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"8 1","pages":"e65 - e65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the effectiveness, convenience, and reversibility of fertility, long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use is still low in the world and Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Myths and misconceptions are believed to be one of the major reported barriers and impediments to LARC use. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate myths and misconceptions about LARC use among women of reproductive age in Debre Brehan town, Ethiopia, at governmental health centers. Methods: A qualitative study using a qualitative descriptive design was conducted from January 24 to April 15, 2022. Twenty-nine reproductive-age women who came for family planning services and 6 key informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique, and an in-depth interview technique with semistructured questionnaires was used to collect the data. The analysis was conducted using the thematic analysis method and ATLAS. ti9 qualitative software was used to support the analysis. Result: The findings of this study revealed that women had a variety of myths and misconceptions about the use of long-acting reversible contraception, including that it had an adverse impact on reproductive health problems and a predisposition to maternal and fetal illness; that the method was unsafe and ineffective in its characteristics; and that, socio-culturally, it was an unacceptable and undesirable method for women to use. Conclusion: This study indicates that there are widespread myths and misconceptions regarding long-acting reversible contraception use in reproductive-age women, which emanate from different concerns in the community. Measures should be taken by the concerned body to dispel or at least reduce these myths and misconceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚Debre Berhan政府卫生中心育龄妇女对长效可逆避孕的误解和误解:定性研究
背景:尽管生育具有有效性、便利性和可逆性,但在世界和撒哈拉以南非洲,包括埃塞俄比亚,长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法的使用率仍然很低。神话和误解被认为是LARC使用的主要障碍和障碍之一。目的:本研究的目的是调查埃塞俄比亚Debre Brehan镇政府卫生中心育龄妇女使用LARC的神话和误解。方法:采用定性描述设计,于2022年1月24日至4月15日进行定性研究。采用有目的抽样的方法,选取29名前来接受计划生育服务的育龄妇女和6名关键举报人,采用半结构化问卷的深度访谈法进行数据收集。采用专题分析法和ATLAS进行分析。采用Ti9定性软件支持分析。结果:这项研究的结果表明,妇女对使用长效可逆避孕有各种误解和误解,包括认为它对生殖健康问题有不利影响,容易患孕产妇和胎儿疾病;该方法的特点是不安全和无效的;从社会文化的角度来看,这对女性来说是一种不可接受和不受欢迎的方法。结论:本研究表明,关于育龄妇女使用长效可逆避孕存在广泛的误解和误解,这些误解和误解源于社会各界的不同关注。有关机构应采取措施消除或至少减少这些神话和误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advantages of cryopreservation for fertility preservation due to age-related fertility loss Male factor infertility and implication of fertility treatment in low resource settings Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study Prognostic value of a serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff, twelve days after fresh embryo transfer, on predicting live birth among Ugandan women The fertility care gap in the Global South: lessons from The Gambia, West Africa, and ways forward to establish fertility care for all
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1