Relationship with the European Union: Slovenia and Montenegro Compared

Q2 Social Sciences Politics in Central Europe Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2478/PCE-2020-0030
Gordana Djurovic, Damjan Lajh
{"title":"Relationship with the European Union: Slovenia and Montenegro Compared","authors":"Gordana Djurovic, Damjan Lajh","doi":"10.2478/PCE-2020-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As part of former Yugoslavia and non -members of the Eastern Bloc, Slovenia and Montenegro enjoyed a special status and relationships with the European Communities (EC) before most other socialist countries. Economic and social interactions with the EC and its member states thus formed part of Slovenian and Montenegrin life even during socialism, particularly after Yugoslavia signed special agreements on trade relations with the EC in the 1970s and 1980s. In this respect, Europeanisation as ‘practical’ integration with the EC was closely linked with liberalisation processes concerning the economy, society and politics along with democratic transition processes that began in the late 1980s. When Slovenia joined the European Union (EU) in 2004 following a relatively smooth integration process, Montenegro was still holding EU candidate member status, after having officially started its accession negotiations in June 2012. The article analyses selected development and integration aspects of Slovenia and Montenegro, their relationship with the EU, together with their similarities and differences. The aim is to highlight developments in both countries and determine whether Slovenia, as an ex -Yugoslav republic and EU member since 2004, may serve as a good example for Montenegro to follow while pursuing European integration.","PeriodicalId":37403,"journal":{"name":"Politics in Central Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics in Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/PCE-2020-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As part of former Yugoslavia and non -members of the Eastern Bloc, Slovenia and Montenegro enjoyed a special status and relationships with the European Communities (EC) before most other socialist countries. Economic and social interactions with the EC and its member states thus formed part of Slovenian and Montenegrin life even during socialism, particularly after Yugoslavia signed special agreements on trade relations with the EC in the 1970s and 1980s. In this respect, Europeanisation as ‘practical’ integration with the EC was closely linked with liberalisation processes concerning the economy, society and politics along with democratic transition processes that began in the late 1980s. When Slovenia joined the European Union (EU) in 2004 following a relatively smooth integration process, Montenegro was still holding EU candidate member status, after having officially started its accession negotiations in June 2012. The article analyses selected development and integration aspects of Slovenia and Montenegro, their relationship with the EU, together with their similarities and differences. The aim is to highlight developments in both countries and determine whether Slovenia, as an ex -Yugoslav republic and EU member since 2004, may serve as a good example for Montenegro to follow while pursuing European integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与欧洲联盟的关系:斯洛文尼亚和黑山的比较
斯洛文尼亚和黑山是前南斯拉夫的一部分,也是东方集团的非成员,在大多数其他社会主义国家之前,它们在欧洲共同体享有特殊地位和关系。因此,即使在社会主义时期,特别是在南斯拉夫于1970年代和1980年代与欧共体签署贸易关系特别协定之后,与欧共体及其成员国的经济和社会互动也成为斯洛文尼亚人和黑山人生活的一部分。在这方面,欧洲化作为与欧盟委员会的“实际”一体化,与经济、社会和政治的自由化进程以及始于20世纪80年代末的民主过渡进程密切相关。斯洛文尼亚在经过相对顺利的一体化进程后于2004年加入欧洲联盟时,黑山在2012年6月正式开始入盟谈判后,仍保持欧盟候选成员国地位。本文分析了斯洛文尼亚和黑山在发展和一体化方面的选择,它们与欧盟的关系,以及它们的异同。其目的是强调这两个国家的事态发展,并确定斯洛文尼亚自2004年以来作为前南斯拉夫共和国和欧盟成员国,是否可以成为黑山在追求欧洲一体化时效仿的好榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics in Central Europe
Politics in Central Europe Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE – The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association is an independent and internationally peer-reviewed scientific journal in political science and international relations. The Journal was established in 2005 as the scientific review that publishes scientific essays, book reviews and information about conferences and other events connected with Central European issues. POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE publishes politics, policy analysis, international relations and other sub-disciplines of political original, peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide scientific essays focusing on issues in comparative science, as well as original theoretical or conceptual analyses. All essays must contribute to a broad understanding of the region of Central Europe. Our goal is to give scholars from Central Europe and beyond the opportunity to present the results of their research.
期刊最新文献
Opportunities and Limits of Presidential Activism: Czech presidents compared Equality implies proportionality: Assessing the (dis)proportionality of constituencies created for the 2022 Slovak regional elections The Impact of Electoral Gender Quotas on Women’s Political Participation in Bosnia and Herzegovina Cabinet formation under semi-presidentialism: European countries in comparison IlliberalNeo-Intergovernmentalism: Poland’s Conservative Idea for the European Union?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1