Playing to the crowd: The audience’s role in team-operated media

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION Australian Journalism Review Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.1386/ajr_00006_1
Michael Mirer
{"title":"Playing to the crowd: The audience’s role in team-operated media","authors":"Michael Mirer","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00006_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sports leagues and teams have entered the media industry, producing news content about themselves for broad consumption. The content producers behind these stories still largely position themselves as journalists, despite their lack of independence. They do so by engaging in boundary\n work, a process in which professional authority is won by enlisting other stakeholders in recognizing an occupational group’s jurisdiction over a societal task. While much of the debate over in-house reporting focuses on acceptance within the journalistic community, readers are also\n an important and underexplored stakeholder. This textual analysis of reader response to in-house coverage of athlete protest suggests that fans may respond to this content in ways that contest the commercial mission of a team website. As such, readers may be drawing their own boundaries in\n a media system with in-house content producers, and scholars should explore these questions.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journalism Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00006_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sports leagues and teams have entered the media industry, producing news content about themselves for broad consumption. The content producers behind these stories still largely position themselves as journalists, despite their lack of independence. They do so by engaging in boundary work, a process in which professional authority is won by enlisting other stakeholders in recognizing an occupational group’s jurisdiction over a societal task. While much of the debate over in-house reporting focuses on acceptance within the journalistic community, readers are also an important and underexplored stakeholder. This textual analysis of reader response to in-house coverage of athlete protest suggests that fans may respond to this content in ways that contest the commercial mission of a team website. As such, readers may be drawing their own boundaries in a media system with in-house content producers, and scholars should explore these questions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向大众:受众在团队运营媒体中的角色
体育联盟和球队已经进入媒体行业,制作关于他们自己的新闻内容以供广泛消费。尽管缺乏独立性,但这些故事背后的内容生产者在很大程度上仍将自己定位为记者。他们通过参与边界工作来做到这一点,在这个过程中,通过争取其他利益相关者承认一个职业群体对一项社会任务的管辖权,来赢得专业权威。虽然关于内部报道的争论主要集中在新闻界的接受程度上,但读者也是一个重要的、未被充分发掘的利益相关者。本文对读者对运动员抗议的内部报道的反应进行了文本分析,结果表明,球迷可能会以质疑球队网站商业使命的方式对这些内容做出反应。因此,读者可能会在内部内容生产者的媒体系统中划定自己的边界,学者们应该探索这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journalism Review
Australian Journalism Review Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
News Values from an Audience Perspective, Martina Temmerman and Jelle Mast (eds) (2021) Borderland: Decolonizing the Words of War, Chrisanthi Giotis (2022) Cultures of accountability: On the intersection of accountability, media and popular reality Democratic listening: News podcasts, trust and political participation in Australia Defining journalism: How a new approach to a definition could revolutionize media freedom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1