Review of: Journalism Practice and Critical Reflexivity, Bonita Mason (2023) New York: Routledge, 226 pp., ISBN 978-1-13860-303-5, h/bk, AUD 218.40 ISBN 978-0-42946-922-0, e-book, AUD 73.99
评论Journalism Practice and Critical Reflexivity, Bonita Mason (2023) New York：Routledge, 226 pp., ISBN 978-1-13860-303-5, h/bk, AUD 218.40 ISBN 978-0-42946-922-0, e-book, AUD 73.99
{"title":"Journalism Practice and Critical Reflexivity, Bonita Mason (2023)","authors":"Laura Glitsos","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00152_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00152_5","url":null,"abstract":"Review of: Journalism Practice and Critical Reflexivity, Bonita Mason (2023)\u0000 New York: Routledge, 226 pp.,\u0000 ISBN 978-1-13860-303-5, h/bk, AUD 218.40\u0000 ISBN 978-0-42946-922-0, e-book, AUD 73.99","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141391807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Hollings, A. Wake, Raja Peter, Fiona R. Martin, V. Rupar
This article explores how educational qualifications, age, gender and regional context affect journalism educators’ perceptions of journalism’s normative roles and the future needs of journalism students. It draws on Australian and New Zealand/Aotearoan responses to the 2021 World Journalism Education Council (WJEC) Survey Journalistic Roles, Values and Qualifications in the 21st Century: How Journalism Educators Across the Globe View the Future of a Profession in Transition. It shows that holding a Ph.D. diminishes support for traditional observer and disseminator roles and predicts support for the mobilizer role. Age also predicts role perception; it diminishes support for the disseminator and mobilizer roles for both the current position of journalists and journalists in the next ten years. These age and education effects are independent of each other. The findings point to the need for more detailed research on the effects of further education on journalism teachers’ professional conceptions and teaching strategy.
{"title":"An examination of factors influencing journalism educators’ perceptions on the role and future of news reporting","authors":"J. Hollings, A. Wake, Raja Peter, Fiona R. Martin, V. Rupar","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00149_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00149_1","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how educational qualifications, age, gender and regional context affect journalism educators’ perceptions of journalism’s normative roles and the future needs of journalism students. It draws on Australian and New Zealand/Aotearoan responses to the 2021 World Journalism Education Council (WJEC) Survey Journalistic Roles, Values and Qualifications in the 21st Century: How Journalism Educators Across the Globe View the Future of a Profession in Transition. It shows that holding a Ph.D. diminishes support for traditional observer and disseminator roles and predicts support for the mobilizer role. Age also predicts role perception; it diminishes support for the disseminator and mobilizer roles for both the current position of journalists and journalists in the next ten years. These age and education effects are independent of each other. The findings point to the need for more detailed research on the effects of further education on journalism teachers’ professional conceptions and teaching strategy.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141394068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of: Violence against Women in the Global South: Reporting in the #MeToo Era, Andrea Jean Baker, Celeste González de Bustamante and Jeannine E. Relly (eds) (2023) Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 259 pp., ISBN 978-3-03130-910-6, h/bk, EUR 129.99 ISBN 978-3-03130-911-3, e-book, EUR 106.99
审查：全球南部对妇女的暴力：Andrea Jean Baker, Celeste González de Bustamante and Jeannine E. Relly (eds) (2023) Cham：Palgrave Macmillan，259 页，ISBN 978-3-03130-910-6，印刷版，129.99 欧元 ISBN 978-3-03130-911-3，电子书，106.99 欧元
{"title":"Violence against Women in the Global South: Reporting in the #MeToo Era, Andrea Jean Baker, Celeste González de Bustamante and Jeannine E. Relly (eds) (2023)","authors":"J. Gleave","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00157_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00157_5","url":null,"abstract":"Review of: Violence against Women in the Global South: Reporting in the #MeToo Era, Andrea Jean Baker, Celeste González de Bustamante and Jeannine E. Relly (eds) (2023)\u0000 Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 259 pp.,\u0000 ISBN 978-3-03130-910-6, h/bk, EUR 129.99\u0000 ISBN 978-3-03130-911-3, e-book, EUR 106.99","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141398781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Janet Fulton, Sora Park, Kerry McCallum, Kieran McGuinness
This article reports on a pilot study that examined representational and content diversity in Australian media through semi-structured interviews with experts in the field and secondary documentary analysis of available public reports, news articles and websites. Of the eleven axes of diversity explored in the wider project, this article focuses on ability, ethnicity, religion and class, based on the experience and expertise of the interview participants. The analysis revealed four common themes: (1) the media’s tendency to narrowly and predictably portray diverse groups; (2) the lack of diversity in newsrooms and management, and its impact on content and representation; (3) commercial imperatives and (4) the value and impact (or not) of policies. While there are some areas of the media that are seen to be doing a better job, the overwhelming consensus among the participants supported community advocacy and academic literature that finds Australian news media can do better when it comes to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).
{"title":"‘You can’t be what you can’t see’: A pilot study of reflections on diversity and inclusion in the news media","authors":"Janet Fulton, Sora Park, Kerry McCallum, Kieran McGuinness","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00148_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00148_1","url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a pilot study that examined representational and content diversity in Australian media through semi-structured interviews with experts in the field and secondary documentary analysis of available public reports, news articles and websites. Of the eleven axes of diversity explored in the wider project, this article focuses on ability, ethnicity, religion and class, based on the experience and expertise of the interview participants. The analysis revealed four common themes: (1) the media’s tendency to narrowly and predictably portray diverse groups; (2) the lack of diversity in newsrooms and management, and its impact on content and representation; (3) commercial imperatives and (4) the value and impact (or not) of policies. While there are some areas of the media that are seen to be doing a better job, the overwhelming consensus among the participants supported community advocacy and academic literature that finds Australian news media can do better when it comes to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI).","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141397926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of: Happiness in Journalism, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Avery E. Holton, Mark Deuze and Claudia Mellado (eds) (2023) London: Routledge, 216 pp., ISBN 978-1-03242-855-0, h/bk, AUD 273 ISBN 978-1-03242-854-3, p/bk, AUD 79.99 ISBN 978-1-00336-459-7, e-book, AUD 62.09
评论Happiness in Journalism, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Avery E. Holton, Mark Deuze and Claudia Mellado (eds) (2023) London：Routledge, 216 pp., ISBN 978-1-03242-855-0, h/bk, AUD 273 ISBN 978-1-03242-854-3, p/bk, AUD 79.99 ISBN 978-1-00336-459-7, e-book, AUD 62.09
{"title":"Happiness in Journalism, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Avery E. Holton, Mark Deuze and Claudia Mellado (eds) (2023)","authors":"Kimina Lyall","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00156_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00156_5","url":null,"abstract":"Review of: Happiness in Journalism, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Avery E. Holton, Mark Deuze and Claudia Mellado (eds) (2023)\u0000 London: Routledge, 216 pp.,\u0000 ISBN 978-1-03242-855-0, h/bk, AUD 273\u0000 ISBN 978-1-03242-854-3, p/bk, AUD 79.99\u0000 ISBN 978-1-00336-459-7, e-book, AUD 62.09","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141393027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The crisis in the news industry is affecting journalism as a profession. There are concerns about the increasing precarity of the job, with fewer opportunities of full-time employment and a clear career path. Through an analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census 2021 data, this study examines the current state of journalists’ occupation. Since 2011, there was an overall decline (19 per cent) in the number of journalists in Australia. The largest reduction occurred in print media, where the number of journalists halved. In contrast, the number of ‘journalists not further defined’ increased by 39 per cent. This category reflects the increase in the number of journalists who would not typically be working in a traditional journalism role. Workers in these categories of ‘not further defined’ and ‘not elsewhere classified’ earn less, are younger and are less likely to be employed full-time. Overall, the data reveal that many journalists in 2021 are facing precarious work arrangements.
{"title":"Changing journalists’ occupations: An analysis of Australian Census 2021","authors":"Sora Park, J. Lee, Caroline Fisher","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00146_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00146_1","url":null,"abstract":"The crisis in the news industry is affecting journalism as a profession. There are concerns about the increasing precarity of the job, with fewer opportunities of full-time employment and a clear career path. Through an analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Census 2021 data, this study examines the current state of journalists’ occupation. Since 2011, there was an overall decline (19 per cent) in the number of journalists in Australia. The largest reduction occurred in print media, where the number of journalists halved. In contrast, the number of ‘journalists not further defined’ increased by 39 per cent. This category reflects the increase in the number of journalists who would not typically be working in a traditional journalism role. Workers in these categories of ‘not further defined’ and ‘not elsewhere classified’ earn less, are younger and are less likely to be employed full-time. Overall, the data reveal that many journalists in 2021 are facing precarious work arrangements.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141408806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of: Believability: Sexual Violence, Media and the Politics of Doubt, Sarah Banet-Weiser and Kathryn Claire Higgins (2023) Cambridge: Polity Books, 258 pp., ISBN 978-1-50955-381-5, h/bk, AUD 103.95 ISBN 978-1-50955-382-2, p/bk, AUD 32.95 ISBN 978-1-50955-383-9, e-book, AUD 26.99
回顾：Believability：性暴力、媒体和怀疑政治》，Sarah Banet-Weiser 和 Kathryn Claire Higgins（2023 年），剑桥：Polity Books，258 页，ISBN 978-1-50955-381-5，h/bk，103.95 澳元 ISBN 978-1-50955-382-2，p/bk，32.95 澳元 ISBN 978-1-50955-383-9，电子书，26.99 澳元
{"title":"Believability: Sexual Violence, Media and the Politics of Doubt, Sarah Banet-Weiser and Kathryn Claire Higgins (2023)","authors":"A. Baker","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00158_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00158_5","url":null,"abstract":"Review of: Believability: Sexual Violence, Media and the Politics of Doubt, Sarah Banet-Weiser and Kathryn Claire Higgins (2023)\u0000 Cambridge: Polity Books, 258 pp.,\u0000 ISBN 978-1-50955-381-5, h/bk, AUD 103.95\u0000 ISBN 978-1-50955-382-2, p/bk, AUD 32.95\u0000 ISBN 978-1-50955-383-9, e-book, AUD 26.99","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141411023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the present study, we compare coverage in mainstream English and minority ethnic media in Australia of the Uluru Statement proposal for a Voice and later referendum announcements, over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2023, to compare any changes over time within and between these two sets of media. With the election of the Labor government in 2022 and subsequent referendum announcements in early 2023, we are provided an opportunity to study the influence of key actors, in this case an incoming government with a signature policy, on discourse in the multi-ethnic public sphere. Our overarching aim is to compare the extent to which an issue of national, political and civic importance is addressed across both the mainstream English and the minority ethnic public sphere in contemporary, multicultural Australia. The results of keyword searches show that, while there were significant increases in mainstream English media coverage of the Voice referendum proposal, corresponding to the election of the Labor government in 2022 and then subsequent announcements of an upcoming referendum in early 2023, there was inconsistent coverage across the minority ethnic media we studied: while significant increases in coverage in the Chinese media mirrored those in the mainstream English media, there was only a small increase in one of the Vietnamese media over the same period, and no increase in the other Vietnamese media. The findings presented here have implications for scholars and others interested in the development of a truly multicultural public sphere in Australia and elsewhere.
{"title":"Hearing the voice: Coverage of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum in Australia’s multi-ethnic public sphere","authors":"H. Ch’ng, Bradley A. Smith, Huong Nguyen","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00151_1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00151_1","url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we compare coverage in mainstream English and minority ethnic media in Australia of the Uluru Statement proposal for a Voice and later referendum announcements, over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2023, to compare any changes over time within and between these two sets of media. With the election of the Labor government in 2022 and subsequent referendum announcements in early 2023, we are provided an opportunity to study the influence of key actors, in this case an incoming government with a signature policy, on discourse in the multi-ethnic public sphere. Our overarching aim is to compare the extent to which an issue of national, political and civic importance is addressed across both the mainstream English and the minority ethnic public sphere in contemporary, multicultural Australia. The results of keyword searches show that, while there were significant increases in mainstream English media coverage of the Voice referendum proposal, corresponding to the election of the Labor government in 2022 and then subsequent announcements of an upcoming referendum in early 2023, there was inconsistent coverage across the minority ethnic media we studied: while significant increases in coverage in the Chinese media mirrored those in the mainstream English media, there was only a small increase in one of the Vietnamese media over the same period, and no increase in the other Vietnamese media. The findings presented here have implications for scholars and others interested in the development of a truly multicultural public sphere in Australia and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141412280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of: The View from Somewhere: Undoing the Myth of Journalistic Objectivity, Lewis Raven Wallace (2019) ISBN 978-0-22682-658-5, p/bk, USD 18 (AUD 28.40) ISBN 978-0-22666-743-0, e-book, USD 17.99 (AUD 28.40)
{"title":"The View from Somewhere: Undoing the Myth of Journalistic Objectivity, Lewis Raven Wallace (2019)","authors":"Bonita Mason","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00154_5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00154_5","url":null,"abstract":"Review of: The View from Somewhere: Undoing the Myth of Journalistic Objectivity, Lewis Raven Wallace (2019)\u0000 ISBN 978-0-22682-658-5, p/bk, USD 18 (AUD 28.40)\u0000 ISBN 978-0-22666-743-0, e-book, USD 17.99 (AUD 28.40)","PeriodicalId":36614,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141407910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：