Assessing the Use of Cooking Demonstrations on Healthy Eating Barriers in City Bus Riders

Julianne Evans, D. C. Castellanos
{"title":"Assessing the Use of Cooking Demonstrations on Healthy Eating Barriers in City Bus Riders","authors":"Julianne Evans, D. C. Castellanos","doi":"10.33697/AJUR.2019.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People living in food-insecure households may experience access-related barriers to preparing and consuming fresh produce, such as high cost and limited local availability. Nutrition interventions that incorporate improved access play a decisive role in overcoming these barriers. The urban bus hub fresh produce market was developed to address food insecurity in Dayton, Ohio. Over four months, dietetic students from a four-year, private, mid-western university provided cooking demonstrations and recipe distribution nutrition interventions at the market. We used a quasi-experimental study design to determine the effectiveness of the cooking demonstration and recipe distribution intervention on access-related barriers at the urban bus hub fresh produce market. A ten-item quantitative questionnaire, on a Likert-type scale from 1-10, with 10 as a more favorable response, and four open-ended questions were administered once to each consented participant (N=33) to examine the recipe effectives and explore the access-related barriers. T-tests were used to examine barriers from the questionnaire and determine differences between participants who made the recipe and participants who did not make the recipe. Results of the t-test indicate no significant difference between those who made the recipe and those who did not make the recipe (p>0.05). Mean scores for affordability, acceptability, accommodation, availability, and accessibility on the then ten-item questionnaire were 7.83, 8.44, 9.19, 9.38, and 8.44, respectively. Thematic analysis results were used to examine the barriers from the open-ended questions further and revealed that affordability and time barriers were present in the priority population. Lack of money, job loss, and unemployment were identified as contributing to affordability barriers and transportation and time to shop, prepare, or cook produce, and to find mealtimes were identified as contributing to time barriers. Nutrition professionals should continue developing appropriate interventions for affordability and time barriers in convenient locations for participants to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption and to establish evidence-based practices.\nKEYWORDS: Cooking demonstrations; food insecurity; produce consumption barriers; nutrition intervention; food stand; recipe distribution; bus hub","PeriodicalId":72177,"journal":{"name":"American journal of undergraduate research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of undergraduate research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33697/AJUR.2019.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People living in food-insecure households may experience access-related barriers to preparing and consuming fresh produce, such as high cost and limited local availability. Nutrition interventions that incorporate improved access play a decisive role in overcoming these barriers. The urban bus hub fresh produce market was developed to address food insecurity in Dayton, Ohio. Over four months, dietetic students from a four-year, private, mid-western university provided cooking demonstrations and recipe distribution nutrition interventions at the market. We used a quasi-experimental study design to determine the effectiveness of the cooking demonstration and recipe distribution intervention on access-related barriers at the urban bus hub fresh produce market. A ten-item quantitative questionnaire, on a Likert-type scale from 1-10, with 10 as a more favorable response, and four open-ended questions were administered once to each consented participant (N=33) to examine the recipe effectives and explore the access-related barriers. T-tests were used to examine barriers from the questionnaire and determine differences between participants who made the recipe and participants who did not make the recipe. Results of the t-test indicate no significant difference between those who made the recipe and those who did not make the recipe (p>0.05). Mean scores for affordability, acceptability, accommodation, availability, and accessibility on the then ten-item questionnaire were 7.83, 8.44, 9.19, 9.38, and 8.44, respectively. Thematic analysis results were used to examine the barriers from the open-ended questions further and revealed that affordability and time barriers were present in the priority population. Lack of money, job loss, and unemployment were identified as contributing to affordability barriers and transportation and time to shop, prepare, or cook produce, and to find mealtimes were identified as contributing to time barriers. Nutrition professionals should continue developing appropriate interventions for affordability and time barriers in convenient locations for participants to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption and to establish evidence-based practices. KEYWORDS: Cooking demonstrations; food insecurity; produce consumption barriers; nutrition intervention; food stand; recipe distribution; bus hub
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估烹饪示范在城市公交车乘客健康饮食障碍中的应用
生活在粮食不安全家庭的人们在准备和消费新鲜农产品时可能会遇到与获取相关的障碍,例如成本高和当地供应有限。营养干预措施包括改善获取途径,在克服这些障碍方面发挥着决定性作用。城市公交枢纽新鲜农产品市场是为了解决俄亥俄州代顿的粮食不安全问题而开发的。在四个多月的时间里,来自中西部一所四年制私立大学的营养学学生在市场上提供了烹饪示范和食谱分发营养干预。我们使用准实验研究设计来确定烹饪示范和配方分配干预对城市公交枢纽新鲜农产品市场准入相关障碍的有效性。一份10项定量问卷,采用Likert型量表,从1-10分,10分为更有利的回答,对每个同意的参与者(N=33)进行一次四个开放式问题,以检查配方的有效性并探索与获取相关的障碍。T检验用于检查问卷中的障碍,并确定制定配方的参与者和未制定配方的与会者之间的差异。t检验结果表明,制作配方的人和未制作配方的人们之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。在当时的十项问卷中,负担能力、可接受性、住宿、可用性和可及性的平均得分分别为7.83、8.44、9.19、9.38和8.44。专题分析结果用于进一步审查开放式问题的障碍,并表明优先人群存在负担能力和时间障碍。缺乏资金、失业和失业被认为是造成负担能力障碍的原因,而购物、准备或烹饪农产品的交通和时间以及寻找用餐时间被认为是导致时间障碍的原因。营养专业人员应继续在方便的地点为参与者制定适当的干预措施,以解决负担能力和时间障碍,鼓励他们食用水果和蔬菜,并建立循证实践。关键词:烹饪示范;粮食不安全;生产消费壁垒;营养干预;食品摊;配方分配;公共汽车枢纽
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Faculty Opinions of AI Tools: Text Generators and Machine Translators On Sample Size Needed for Block Bootstrap Confidence Intervals to Have Desired Coverage Rates Fibroblast Embedded 3D Collagen as a Potential Tool for Epithelial Wound Repair Elongation Factor P is Required for Processes Associated with Acinetobacter Pathogenesis Measurement System for Compliance in Tubular Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1