Evaluation and Comparison of Trade Relations Between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India: Gravity Model

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES 中国报道 Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1177/00094455231187695
Amsalu K. Addis, Yang Yu, Zuping Zhu
{"title":"Evaluation and Comparison of Trade Relations Between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India: Gravity Model","authors":"Amsalu K. Addis, Yang Yu, Zuping Zhu","doi":"10.1177/00094455231187695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the trade relations between Ethiopia and China as well as Ethiopia and India, and then compares the bilateral trade volume between them. It also examines the nexus between international trade and economic growth. Panel data were adopted to estimate the impact of China’s and India’s bilateral trade with Ethiopia for the 25 years duration (1990–2015). The gravity model has been employed in order to evaluate and compare the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India. To examine the collected data SPSS has been employed. The study also outlined three different hypotheses and examined them based on the consistency of the statistical empirical result of the study as well as the positive unconditional coherence with previous academic literature. The result demonstrates the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China, 0.321, was found to be higher than Ethiopia–India, 0.136. The study’s empirical result also highlights that the influence of geographical proximity alone cannot be a determinant effect on bilateral trade, and discovers a significant linear relationship between a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) and a partner country’s economic size.","PeriodicalId":44314,"journal":{"name":"中国报道","volume":"59 1","pages":"307 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国报道","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455231187695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the trade relations between Ethiopia and China as well as Ethiopia and India, and then compares the bilateral trade volume between them. It also examines the nexus between international trade and economic growth. Panel data were adopted to estimate the impact of China’s and India’s bilateral trade with Ethiopia for the 25 years duration (1990–2015). The gravity model has been employed in order to evaluate and compare the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India. To examine the collected data SPSS has been employed. The study also outlined three different hypotheses and examined them based on the consistency of the statistical empirical result of the study as well as the positive unconditional coherence with previous academic literature. The result demonstrates the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China, 0.321, was found to be higher than Ethiopia–India, 0.136. The study’s empirical result also highlights that the influence of geographical proximity alone cannot be a determinant effect on bilateral trade, and discovers a significant linear relationship between a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) and a partner country’s economic size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚-中国与埃塞俄比亚-印度贸易关系的评估与比较:引力模型
本研究评估了埃塞俄比亚和中国以及埃塞俄比亚和印度之间的贸易关系,然后比较了它们之间的双边贸易额。它还审查了国际贸易与经济增长之间的关系。采用面板数据来估计25年期间(1990-2015年)中国和印度与埃塞俄比亚双边贸易的影响。重力模型用于评估和比较埃塞俄比亚-中国和埃塞俄比亚-印度之间的双边贸易。为了检验所收集的数据,使用了SPSS。该研究还概述了三种不同的假设,并根据研究的统计实证结果的一致性以及与以往学术文献的积极无条件一致性对其进行了检验。结果表明,埃塞俄比亚与中国的双边贸易为0.321,高于埃塞俄比亚与印度的0.136。该研究的实证结果还强调,仅凭地理邻近性的影响并不能成为双边贸易的决定性影响,并发现双边贸易协定与伙伴国经济规模之间存在显著的线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国报道
中国报道 AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9353
期刊介绍: China Report promotes the free expression and discussion of different ideas, approaches and viewpoints which assist a better understanding of China and its East Asian neighbours. A quarterly journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies, it attempts to provide a fresh approach which goes beyond the strictly utilitarian area studies without becoming antiquarian. Launched in 1964, China Report has, over the years, widened its interests and aims and transformed itself into a scholarly journal that seeks a better understanding of China and its East Asian neighbours - particularly their cultures, their development and their relations with China. It is an indispensable source of information on China, its society and culture.
期刊最新文献
Book review: Reena Marwah and Lê Thi. Ha˘\ng Nga. India–Vietnam Relations: Development Dynamics and Strategic Alignment Book review: Lachlan Fleetwood, Science on the Roof of the World: Empire and the Remaking of the Himalaya The Resurgence of Chinese Exceptionalism Under Xi’s Leadership Book review: Rajan Kumar, Meeta Keswani Mehra, G. Venkat Raman and Meenakshi Sundriyal (eds.), Locating BRICS in the Global Order: Perspectives from the Global South Book review: Tansen Sen and Brian Tsui (eds.), Beyond Pan-Asianism: Connecting China and India, 1840s–1960s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1